Monday, November 16, 2015

Put the Lotion, and the Money, in the Basket

Metaphorically speaking of course. I swear I do not have a big pit in my basement where I hold bureaucrats. The industries bureaucrats are however stuck in a pit of their own making and they will be hard pressed to get themselves out. What a disaster the oil and gas producers have put themselves in. Reading their third quarter reports was eye opening, even for me. All but the large integrated producers have any financial resources of size in order to rely on in 2016. And even at that they will be burning cash faster than pets.com did in their heyday. Those that don’t have integrated operations will be lucky to see 2016. Natural gas prices in October dipped to $2.00 before the end of last month's trading. They are currently in the $2.40’s and the future’s contracts for the winter months don’t break out of the $2.40 range. Oil prices are not much better. Recent reports from the IEA stated that oil would not recover until 2020.

The race is therefore on to produce enough to pay the bills. Ever watch the show Breaking Bad where Jesse falls off the wagon and ends up in a drug house. This is where we are as an industry. Where is Walter White when we need him and Mike Ehrmantraut to rescue us? The behaviour is set. The ability, capability and desire to change does not exist with these bureaucrats. Just like Jesse they’re just looking for their next fix. After six years of being hooked on the junk in the natural gas business, and a year of being hooked on the junk in the oil business, do you think you’ll be able to get them into rehab? Maybe I should come up with an inspirational hollywood reference that is appropriate here. Unfortunately no one has ever thought of a story this sad before.

The money that I want the bureaucrats to put in the basket, which of course comes from the movie the Silence of the Lambs, is none other than our budget. It is in that way that we can build the systems necessary for the remake of the industry based on the Preliminary Specification. Which includes the price maker strategy. It is difficult to believe that no one has determined the industry is a price maker before People, Ideas & Objects. Junkies are pretty useless in terms of any productive expectations. A reading of any economics text will show that the industries commodities exhibit monopolistic competition. Show me a replacement to any use of oil or gas. And the large price swings based on small changes in the market availability of oil and gas is the real evidence that proves that it is a price maker based business. Just don’t tell the junkies.

If we accept that as a fact then we can implement the decentralized production model of the Preliminary Specification and ensure that none of the production in North America is ever produced that is not profitable. And profitable based on an accurate accounting. Not on the SEC’s basis of accounting that defines the outer limit of what is acceptable. On the basis of a reasonable way in which to operate the business as a going concern. I know, what a concept.

To do this, all we need to do is provide for the budget, build the software and reorganize the industry. Reorganize it with the prototypical producer being reduced to the C class executives, the earth science and engineering resources, some land, legal and support staff. The rest of the accounting and administrative resources would be reallocated to service providers who are focused on an individual process and will use the entire industry as their client base. It is in this way that, based on the performance accounting at the Joint Operating Committee, the determination if the property can be produced profitably is made. And if it is profitable it produces. If it isn’t profitable it goes into the producers shut-in inventory to be part of their innovative efforts to increase the reserves, expand the production or reduce the costs and return it to profitable production. Also note that putting the property into the shut-in inventory does not incur any administrative or accounting charges from the service providers. That is because without any production activity, there is no action taken and no billing produced by any of the service providers. Doing this will ensure that the producer will be far more profitable even with a lower production profile. We have made all of the producers costs variable. The unprofitable reserves will be saved for a time when they can be produced profitably. And the commodity markets will find their marginal costs as the excess production is removed from the marketplace.

It's common sense really. However this and the other attributes of the Preliminary Specification took me 25 years to bring it to this level. One important aspect of the work that I did is that it is covered by copyright laws, that are pretty much global. Meaning, that as hard as the bureaucrats try to take these ideas, and avoid me, the more they make life miserable for themselves. That’s right folks, they’ve been busted again. This time it's McKinsey, once again. This time out of London so that they are probably unaware of the activities in their Boston office so many years ago. Anyway you should be able to read the article here if you hurry. Other than that it is pleasing to know that the bureaucrats like these ideas so much that they would hire someone, again, to try and take them.

But it just doesn’t work that way anymore. This has continued without consequence to the industry to this point. This must be stopped. Those that have been innocently duped by the bureaucrats have been notified and subsequent action taken. This is appropriate however there have been no financial consequences to the producers who continue to operate in this manner. Effective as of this date I have revised the budget to reflect that the costs of our budget will move from 50%, which is what it was in it its original published amount. And will now be valued at 33.3% with the Intellectual Property Royalty moving to 33.3% and our net earnings now being 33.3%. This has the effect of increasing our costs to the producers from the original $4 billion to the current $6 billion. Thank you. The thing is I could set the royalty and earnings at whatever level I want. Lets hope we don’t have to go there. The bureaucrats will scream blue bloody murder, or maybe just call me crazy, I don’t know and I don’t really care. Just pay the bill.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Monday, November 09, 2015

Taking This Week Off From Posting

Returning November 16, 2015

Friday, November 06, 2015

Third Friday Off


Thursday, November 05, 2015

Warning, Do Not Read

We’ve seen the beginning of the destruction of the industry in terms of its capabilities and capacities. As more people are laid off and more service industry representatives are forced to cannibalize their operations. We can see the gripping that bureaucrats will do when prices of our commodities are at record highs and they can’t find anyone to manage the industry or do anything for them in the field. Will this be the point at which the bureaucrats decide that there’s a need for change? These violent swings from one extreme to the other are going to become more exaggerated as we proceed with the status quo. Deeper into the downturns for longer and harder, much higher in terms of what the highs will be and for much longer than they have been in the past. All in all a very intelligent way to operate the most important industry to society's needs. The investors will continue to sit and wonder at which point, the highs or lows, is the point where they begin to make money. As we know the bureaucrats will be devising ways to ensure that they are rewarded first and foremost, during the good times and the bad times. Seen any bureaucrats on the street these past few weeks?

It’s a good game they’ve got going. Most of the bureaucrats were rewarded with higher stock prices for a day or so after the announcement of layoffs. And I want to point out Exxon’s exemplary behavior in this downturn. Granted they have the downstream to cover off the losses in the upstream. But they stated they don’t announce layoffs. They aren't looking for that sugar high to bounce their stock. But they also said that they manage their business on the basis of the right size that is necessary at all times. They never get too fat, and they never get too lean. This is what I would expect of a company that operates in the 21st century. Exxon employees can assure themselves that if they are doing their jobs to the satisfaction of their bosses then they run no risk of being on the street as a result of those bosses mistakes. That I can only point to Exxon in this industry at this time is not very promising. Chevron alone was responsible for cutting 6,000 to 7,000 people.

You could stick around and wait your turn for the merry-go-round of layoffs to hit you. What we did see in the 1980’s and 1990’s was that bureaucrats soon start to compete on the level of their capability to cut staff. What was believed to be the first and only cuts were quickly replaced with the need for a cover story during annual report season. Then in order to get that sugar high once again, and timing is critical in this process, just before the annual meeting the second round of cuts will be announced. And it becomes a game of who can cut deeper and faster than any other bureaucrat. Then will come a time where there will be no rhyme or reason for the cuts, it's just the bureaucrats competing like you know they can.

If you're like a lot of people, whether you have been cut or not, this brings into question the whole purpose of working in the industry. Why do we have to work with a gun pointed to our head because they can’t deal with the real issues of the business? All I can say is if you think the atmosphere in the industry is bad now, just wait.

This brings up a good question for everyone though. Why are we doing this. For me it’s too important to see these idiots run society off the cliff. I know you're not supposed to care about these kinds of things, but I know I’m not the only one that does. When you have the idea of how you can solve these problems spring into your head 25 years ago, try living with yourself when you do nothing about it. And that’s the hook that I get into most people with this... whatever this is. How can you do nothing in the face of such stupidity when you know that the solution exists to fix the problem. I do want to point out that I warned you not to read this.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

This Way Through

If we follow along with the scenario that we painted yesterday. The industry has a difficult job to do in the next 25 years, we need to be moving to these tasks now and the status of the industry today is in no shape to even consider anything to do with the future. I’ve had a few conversations with people in the past weeks and they see this as the darkest days of the industry. Our own 2008 and I want to suggest here that it is the end of the way that these producers operate and function, and therefore the industry as we know it. Shale is a fundamental change to the business that hasn’t been, and can’t be considered by the bureaucrats and as a result they will run the business into the ground. This third quarter has shown the beginning of the devastation. Natural gas has shown the inability to act when these trends have existed in that business for six years now. Cutting the staff and the service industry are the wrong, long term strategic, things to be doing. It should be to no one's surprise that I am writing off the existing bureaucratic oil and gas industry. It will not recover from the price related difficulties it’s in. How long it will take before the bankruptcies begin will be short due to the very poor financial structure of the producers.

As I have said, this is the process of creative destruction. The difficulty is that it’s in the high paced 21st century that we live in. Usually this is done over a generation and a firm can make some of the changes necessary to recover from the difficulties. If I were an engineer or a geologist I would be organizing a new producer for what I would call the new oil and gas industry. A producer that would use the Preliminary Specifications decentralized production models price maker strategy. And wait for the next phase of the decline of the existing industry. That being the parachuting of the boards of directors, C class executives and others that know it's over and don’t want to be around to clean up. Oh and let's not forget the bureaucrats, they’ve had their exit plans ready for a while. And secondly, and most particularly, the asset sales that will begin in wholesale volumes and at deep discount prices. We’re seeing some major sales of properties already, for good prices, what we will see in a few months is a lot of sales at fire sales prices in order to keep the rent paid and the lights on.

Our price maker strategy is based on the principles of economics regarding what makes a “price maker.” These are...

A monopoly or a firm within monopolistic competition that has the power to influence the price it charges as the good it produces does not have perfect substitutes.
A monopoly is a price maker as it holds a large amount of power over the price it charges. A price maker is a firm within monopolistic competition which produces goods that are differentiated in some way from its competitors' products. This kind of price maker is also a profit-maximizer as it will increase output only as long as its marginal revenue is greater than its marginal cost, in other words, as long as it's producing a profit.

There are no substitutes for the oil and gas commodities that we produce. Therefore it is monopolistic competition that the producers are involved in. Another characteristic of price makers is that small changes in the volume of product in the marketplace make for significant  changes in the price. No one today in the oil and gas industry, would believe otherwise. It will be the movement of the properties from the current poorly performing producers to the ones that are being established now that will execute the change. The new producers will be able to use the price maker strategy of the Preliminary Specification and implement profitable operations across a new oil and gas industry. We will still have the Exxon's, Shells, BP’s and Chevron’s, and of course we will need them. And they too will need to move to the Preliminary Specification.

All of this destruction of course was unnecessary. The bureaucrats had to giggle and do their thing. It's the hard working people in the industry who have to pay. I am coming up on ten years of writing in this blog and there has only been the one adversary throughout those ten years, the bureaucrats. And there has has only been one objective. To bring new ERP systems to the oil and gas industry based on the Joint Operating Committee. Yes I am stubborn, but that should provide you with the knowledge that these bureaucrats did it their way so they could keep their gravy train in tact and didn’t have to do any of the hard work of implementing the necessary changes. They just don’t care, if they did you and I would be busy building systems.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Tuesday, November 03, 2015

2040

The next 25 years will be one of the most important periods in the history of the oil and gas industry. Expectations of significant increases in demand for our commodities are common with China and India moving more of its populations into the middle class. There are also a variety of claims that the amount of investment necessary to meet that demand are estimated in the $20 to $40 trillion range. As an industry we will certainly be busy and the technical challenges to the geologists and engineers will be like none other that we have experienced before. The shale reserves that we currently know and understand will provide us with a valuable head start in making sure that we succeed in these tasks.

The third quarter reports from the oil and gas producers however don’t provide me with the understanding of how we’ll get there. None of these companies are in good shape, in my opinion. Looking critically at the industry it is fair to assess the smaller producers as catastrophe’s. Many of the mid-sized and independent producers are in very poor shape as well. The only real known survivors, in my opinion, are those that can lean heavily on the refining and marketing side of the business to see the downstream support the upstream through these difficulties. Exxon, BP, Shell and Chevron relied heavily on their downstream operations to continue with profitable operations. Here’s the thing, however, these four companies have a $20 billion cash flow shortfall to make up. You have desperately weak companies that will need many years of rehabilitation and care in order to be nursed back into viable operations. Add the fact that interest rates are about to be increased, and you have at least ten years before you see, in my opinion, a resurgent oil and gas industry. Good commodity prices or not.

If we go back to my argument about the recording of capital assets. Whether under full cost or successful efforts. For decades it has been the tradition, the culture and the SEC dicated policy that everything is capitalized. This includes 75 - 80% of the overhead that is incurred by the producer on an annual basis. Overheads can reach 20 - 25% of the revenues in most companies. The smaller companies incur much larger percentages of overhead due to their inability to scale. All of these capital costs are amortized over the life of the oil and gas reserves. Making for an escalating size of the producers balance sheet. How will we tell the future investors that we still haven’t accounted for these costs when our hand is out for more money to recapitalize these firms?

The capital assets have been built up to stratospheric levels in each and every producer in the industry. At no time is the management, in the past twenty years ever been assessed based on the costs it took to build these capital assets. The amount of depletion within any year has usually been a token amount. It should be the opposite. The industry should have been willingly moving those assets off of the balance sheet and recognizing them as a cost in order to recover the cash investment made in the first place. If they did that in the past of course they would have recorded significant losses and probably would have gone out of business. The state of affairs today isn’t any different! The producer firms are zombie corporations that in a normal environment would have gone out of business. As they stand today they are just stacked to the ceiling with unaccounted for costs. By leaving the assets on the balance sheet they never have to account for their performance, and never realized the real costs of the oil and gas they produced. As a result they continued to overinvest with the annual infusion of “other people’s money” which lead to this period of overproduction. Now they have no cash, no working capital, literally no financial resources to lean on in the darkest days of the industry. Unhappy banks and angry investors. With stacks to the ceiling of capital assets that will sit there for a decade or longer before they are ever accounted for. A very desperate situation.

Organizationally oil and gas producers are running out of pink colored paper. They forced the service industry into the mode of having to cannibalize their businesses in order to survive. Layoffs in that industry have been epic. And probably only the initial phases are over. The people that work in oil and gas are being sent home at a rapid pace as well. In Calgary you can buy a $4 million home for $1.2 million. The attitude in the employment marketplace is that there are better opportunities elsewhere in other industries. Why wait for oil and gas to get itself sorted. I find the bureaucrats are employing a 1960’s type of attitude that deals with its overproduction issues by laying off the staff and service industry. Anything but actually deal with the problem or take responsibility for it. I think my opinion is well known on this point.

We stand on the shoulders of giants. What I am saying is we have far to fall in terms of our capabilities as an industry. Investors have spent the past decades subsidizing oil and gas consumers because bureaucrats refuse to account for their performance. We have 25 years of hard work ahead of us. We are the most important industry to society. I don’t honestly know how, based on the current situation these bureaucrats have put us in, we are going to overcome the difficulties that they have created for these organizations. To focus the industry on its future is not a conversation that I can have with anyone. I do know that the only way we can see clearly through this fog of destruction is with the Preliminary Specification. I am certainly biased, but then again, I’ve been screaming about these problems for a while.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.

Monday, November 02, 2015

Aliens, and Other Phenomenon

Reading the quarterly reports that came out last week. It appears that the low oil and gas prices are a phenomenon brought about by aliens from another planet. That the producers overproduction of oil and gas may have had something to do with the decline in prices has never entered the realm of possibilities of any bureaucrats mind. It's just amazing that the aliens would be doing this. And it's amazing that they don’t understand this basic principle called supply and demand. What would we expect though, for bureaucrats to take responsibility? We’d be as mistaken as they are.

The other aspect of this chronic insanity is what are they able to do about it? If they did take responsibility for the overproduction that would mean they were going to take steps to solve the issue. How would they do that? The organizational inertia within the oil and gas producer is so strong. So dedicated to the wants and needs of the bureaucrat. To introduce any change in the organization would require the energy equivalent of all the shale reserves available. Everybody would be interested and enthused right up to the time of the first central committee meeting. At which time we all know what would happen then.

Change on the scale of what the Preliminary Specification imputes doesn’t occur from within. It happens outside of the organization, and as a result of what has been aptly described as creative destruction. People, Ideas & Objects, our user community and service providers are doing the creative stuff. And the bureaucrats, as we can clearly see, are doing the destruction part of the equation. In that sense the oil and gas industry is in a healthy balance at the moment. What we can’t expect to happen is that these bureaucrats will see the light of their destructive ways and do anything about it, or even fund our budget. After all there are many trillions of dollars yet to be destroyed.

It's one thing for us to be timely in terms of the state of affairs of the oil and gas industry. This trend of losing money by the bureaucrats has now begun in earnest and will continue until there is nothing left. That might be as much as a year and half from now. But there is another trend that we are consistent with here at People, Ideas & Objects, our user community and the service providers. And that of course is disintermediation of the industry through the application of Information Technology. Many industries have already been disintermediated such as the cellular phone market. Anyone ever here of who the market leader in that business is? There name is Nokia. Dinosaur’s die and the biggest dinosaur in the marketplace today is the oil and gas industry.

If you believe that “rebalancing the market” will occur without addressing the new dynamic of shale reservoirs then you are a true believer in bureaucracies. If on the other hand you believe implementing a price maker strategy in an industry that reflects price maker characteristics makes sense, then you should look at our Preliminary Specifications decentralized production model. We provide producers with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. This is done through the production allocation process of evaluating each individual property, and if it’s profitable, it will produce. And we take into consideration the entire cost of the operations. Not the convoluted accounting methods that the bureaucrats use where everything is capitalized on the balance sheet for generations. We ensure that the investor's capital is returned and a timely return on that investment is provided. We don’t build capital assets to the sky on the balance sheet until the producer is so unbalanced as to not be viable. That is to say I don’t see capitalizing everything being a good policy for the types of companies we have on this planet.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Friday, October 30, 2015

The Dynamics of the Natural Gas Marketplace...

are a precursor to the actions in the oil market. That’s why we don’t talk about natural gas prices declining this week. Is anyone else surprised at the level of discussion regarding the tragic, systemic and chronic overproduction of natural gas. “Move along comrade’s nothing to see here.” Some people had commented that I was being too harsh regarding my commentary here. I think the contrary, these bureaucrats have been treated too kindly. What is going on is insane. Our own version of a 2008 financial crisis exclusively for the oil and gas industry. Confidence and faith in the people running this business is, and will continue to evaporate until there is none left. My disrespect of the bureaucrats is the reality of the situation and a precursor of most people’s opinions. Unfortunately a lot of good people are being unnecessarily and adversely affected by this self serving bureaucracy.

The bureaucrats, when I produced the Preliminary Research Report proposal, laughed at me and then went behind my back to try and steal the ideas that make up the Preliminary Specification. They tried at least two more times in the past ten years and I caught them each time. These actions were designed to remove the competition from the marketplace, not to implement them. When I adopted the byline of “providing oil and gas producers with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations.” They laughed at me again and said that no one worries about profits. Called me a few more names and so on. Now they face this wreckage that they’ve caused in the industry. Is there any doubt who’s responsible? Now instead of doing anything responsible about the situation, they’ll just exit.

Today we see that breaching the natural gas storage capacity has not been kind to the natural gas prices. Bureaucrats have been actively “rebalancing the marketplace” in natural gas for almost six years and in oil for over a year. Which is the critical point in this discussion but first let's note this for the collection. “Rebalancing the market,” is another bureaucratic myth that falls prey to the giant sucking sound. Bureaucrats want us to believe that their actions have no effect on the price of oil or gas. We now have proof that that is not the case. This week's decline in natural gas prices is wholly attributable to bureaucratic incompetence. Remember that giant sucking sound is the credibility of the bureaucrats evaporating. More importantly, the Preliminary Specifications decentralized production models price maker strategy can be seen as valid and viable

The solution to these issues that will be coming from the bureaucrats will of course be to build more storage. What we need to do is to adopt on an industry wide basis an understanding that every molecule of oil and natural gas needs to be produced profitably. It is irreplaceable and too valuable to be throwing away in the manner that we are doing. The cumulative loss in market capitalization over the past year has been in excess of $711 billion for the top 14 North American based producers. That is exactly 177.75 times People, Ideas & Objects budget. That could make for a handsome investment for those that want to take control of the industry away from the bureaucrats and operate the industry profitably. And recall too that our value proposition is in the range of $25.7 to $45.7 trillion over the next 25 years. Just a thought.

Our analogy to the former Soviet Union is apt when the natural gas prices behave as they have been. People would line up for days in the hope that the bakery would have bread any minute! We now see the bureaucrats will continue to produce in the hopes that the “market will rebalance itself” any minute! Hope being the constant in both communist countries and the bureaucratic oath of inaction.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Thursday, October 29, 2015

How We're Different

It’s one thing to complain, argue and point the finger at the bureaucracy. And I revel in the opportunity. People, Ideas & Objects however offer an alternative to the status quo that addresses the specific issues the industry is facing. Our solution provides the oil and gas producer with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. I want to stress however that it fits today’s issues as well as it will fit tomorrow’s. Our use of the Joint Operating Committee is the key to solving the administrative, accounting and operational issues and opens up the opportunities in these areas to be realized by both the industry and the producer. The Joint Operating Committee is the key organizational construct of the dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable producer. It is the legal, financial, operational decision making, cultural, communication, strategic and innovation framework of the industry. With this we are able to ensure that the producer attains a speed, innovativeness and profitability with our Preliminary Specification.

Our use of the Joint Operating Committee is unique within the industry. No other systems provider recognizes the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct. And I would point out that whatever systems they are using now certainly aren’t working. The use of the corporate model in today’s systems is strictly focused on the compliance and governance frameworks. What we have done in the Preliminary Specifications eleven modules is move the compliance and governance frameworks into alignment with the seven frameworks of the Joint Operating Committee. This is the Intellectual Property that is at the heart of our solution. It's where we started in August of 2003 to develop these solutions. It was on the basis of this understanding that I then undertook the ten years of research of what and how the industry would operate, and what and how the producer would operate. This research was then codified in the Preliminary Specification and published in December 2013.

We are not licensing our Intellectual Property to any other systems providers. People, Ideas & Objects and our user community are using this IP as the core of our competitive offering. We have big plans for this, there’s no room for dilutive “me-to” competition. It is this use of IP that the bureaucrats find offensive. That and our scope and scale also renders them redundant. It is however a fool that pursues any business in any industry in the 21st century without the Intellectual Property secured first. Intellectual Property will be a necessary requirement of your employment soon as well. You will have to either own some of your own, have a license to access others Intellectual Property or work for someone who owns some IP or has a license. It is, as of now, not enough to own the oil and gas property anymore. You also have to have access to the Intellectual Property that makes the property profitable. Welcome to the 21st century.

All of our user community members are licensed to access all of our Intellectual Property and most importantly prepare derivative works. They are the source of our competitive capability to accommodate the changing needs of the industry and the producer. In addition to working with our developers, users are the principles in the service provider organizations that are being established to provide our software and their services to the producers administrative and accounting needs. These firms will focus on a process or sub-process of the producers or industries activities and manage it for the entire industry. The service providers are a replacement to the current producers administrative and accounting capabilities. We are shifting from a producer based administrative and accounting based capability. To an industry based administrative and accounting capability. This is done as the building of these capabilities in each and every producer is redundant, is ensuring that producers are unprofitable and are a key to our ability to turn these costs from being a fixed overhead to a variable overhead cost of the producer. Also, by doing so we are building the administrative and accounting capabilities once. Sharing them across the hundreds of producers which is far more efficient than each producer developing the same capabilities as all the other producers and each of the producers sharing none of them.

Our ability to build value over the current bureaucratic nightmare is through what we call the decentralized production model. The service providers that I mentioned bill each producer for the cost of the process they manage to each Joint Operating Committee. Therefore if the property was unprofitable based on current commodity prices and a full accounting of the costs of the property. The Joint Operating Committee could then shut-in the property and all of the activities in our “task and transfer” system would not trigger any action to be taken by any of the service providers for that month. Therefore the service providers would not have anything to bill to the Joint Operating Committee. Achieving the variable nature of the administrative and accounting costs for the producer.

This then would allow the producer to reduce their production profile to the level where only profitable production occurred. If they were overproducing in the current system at 100,000 bbls / day. Then, with the Preliminary Specification, they would be able to determine with exact precision which properties were profitable and keep them producing. Their production profile would drop to 75,000 bbls a day, as would all of their costs. The advantage of this is that their actual profit would soar. And that’s without any change in commodity prices. The producer will have saved the shut-in properties reserves for a time when they can be produced profitably, removed the marginal production from the commodity marketplace, putting a floor on commodity prices and be very profitable on all of their production. They will also have an inventory of non-producing properties in which they can innovate in terms of increasing those reserves, reducing those properties costs or increasing the production in order to return the property to profitable production.

Today what we have amounts to insanity. Breaching inventories with systemic and chronic overproduction isn’t the end of the bureaucrats destruction. They can’t, won’t and will not change. Ever. Someone has to take it away from them. Our solution is appropriate for today. However I have to stress that the Joint Operating Committee provides us with the means to deal with all of the industries administrative, accounting and operational difficulties and opens any and all opportunities to be fully realized.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

"That Giant Sucking Sound"

To quote H.Ross Perot when he ran for president. That is what he thought the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was going to do to jobs in the United States. The giant sucking sound you here on the streets today is the confidence in the bureaucrats evaporating. Faith has been placed in the powers that be, that all was under control. Today we begin the reporting for the third quarter which will show the full scope of the devastation these bureaucrats have created. They put their reputation that all was well on the line. Now we’ll see exactly how they have been doing.

Recall that the earnings reports were one of the three issues we felt that bureaucrats would not be able to overcome in the month of October 2015. That there were three issues. The third quarter report, the breach of natural gas storage capacity and the bank review of their lines of credit. We originally raised these points in a blog post entitled “In Summary” on September 16, 2015. What we stated was these issues would prove that these bureaucrats will never, ever change. That what was required was to throw the bums out and start with the development of the Preliminary Specification, our user community and the service providers. Then we will have a dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable oil and gas industry.

As we speak the natural gas prices are doing well. All sarcasm aside, what do you think these people will do on the oil side of the business? Keep producing until the storage is filled to capacity. I don’t know what happens operationally when 15 bcf / day suddenly has no market, but we’re about to find out. Bureaucrats have been overproducing natural gas for almost six years. It's a continental price. This isn’t OPEC’s doing. We have heard that they are “rebalancing the market” for these past six years. The devastation that is happening now in natural gas is 100% attributable to the bureaucrats. They have no one to blame and they have spent all of their political capital in terms of having any say in the management of the industry. It’s therefore time to throw the bums out.

The oil market is no different than the natural gas market. Other than slightly more advanced issues in terms of time. What OPEC has done is said that their production will be the one constant in the market. And others will have to fill the swing producer role. The higher cost producers will have to occupy that swing producer role. And as a result the bureaucrats argue that the Saudi’s need something like $185 / barrel because of the high social costs of their government's budget. And that the Saudi’s are therefore the higher cost producers. Then in the next sentence they state they’ll be profitable at $20 / barrel. The fact of the matter is these are lies. If you used the same basis as they used to calculate the Saudi’s costs, the American producers would need $10,000 / barrel. There is also no way that they can even account for their overhead with $20 production. These bureaucrats have lied and abused the goodwill of our governments, the press and society in general for so long they think they can get away with saying anything. What they really should do is run for the democratic nomination!

The fact of the matter is they don’t know when to stop, they don’t know how to stop, it's an engineering induced nightmare. Today is the first day that we will see the producers third quarter reports. I could be wrong but I think that people are going to be surprised that bureaucrats would think that they could continue producing when they are losing so much money on each barrel of oil and mcf of natural gas. Why would anyone continue to do things that are that destructive to themselves? They don’t care! And that will be evident to everyone. Look for the bureaucrats argument that the writedown of assets is a sunk cost. Well those sunk costs represent the money they took from the investors and promised a return. And if we are to ignore these sunk costs in terms of your third quarter report, when exactly do we consider their performance with those investments. It is systemic throughout the industry that you never have to account for the money that you took from the investors. The fact that you consistently diluted them and abused them during the good times means that they will continue to take the abuse now. So why quit?

Sunk costs are one issue but the fact that oil and natural gas is unprofitable as soon as you dislodge it from the rock to begin the production process is the other. Operating losses will be horrendous. Losing money on basic operations on this scale is something that only a fool would do. This is the end of the credibility of the bureaucrats who run the show. That giant sucking sound will be getting much louder as the next few weeks pass and the scope and scale of these issues begin to be realized. Watch our twitter stream after today’s close to enjoy the show up close and personal. The bigger issue here for the bureaucrats is that they have built a house of cards. They have no cash, no working capital, no credit facilities, no access to debt or equity markets. Basic operations burn cash. And they have the fixed overhead that on a good day would consume 25% of their revenues. And they produce until the storage can’t take anymore. This is the end of the oil and gas industry as we know it. Our own unique style of 2008 type of failure. Join me as I watch and enjoy those who laughed and laughed at me as they have their credibility shredded and destroyed by their own hands.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here