No Money Being Made Here

Any idiot can spend, just give them the money. And that is what we have in oil and gas. A bureaucracy that can spend. Commodity prices are up, increase spending by 200%. Commodity prices are down, reduce spending by 10%. Commodity prices are up once again, double spending again. If you're an engineer or geologist with oil flowing where their should be blood. Forget it. You're nobody in a world of bureaucrats with checkbooks and contacts in New York. How can you compete in a world where there is no differentiation between the things that are done? Everyone just spends, drills and reports profits. Miss your projected deliverability targets however, and you’ll find yourself in the ash heap of history. Those are the rules.

The problem is that none of the production, at any point in time, has been profitable if you consider the actual costs. Production needs to include the capital that was used in the drilling, equipping, and production facilities. And would also need to consider the costs of all of the overhead of those people and offices. These costs are never counted because they are capitalized and only the smallest sliver of them is ever recognized in any one year. When bureaucrats verbally state if they are profitable or not they are not subject to any regulatory requirement of what a profit is. So they state the “netback” which is the revenue less royalty less operating costs number that never ceases to amaze and confuse.

So commodity prices have fallen as a result of the mismanagement and inherent unprofitable overproduction by the bureaucrats. This shell game is going to be exposed here for what it is in the financial reports of the producers in the next few months. What we need to focus on is the state of affairs of the industry today. The trajectory it's on. Where the investors are in terms of their thinking about the industry. What needs to happen to ensure that society maintains its standard of living in an uninterrupted manner. And mostly importantly, what trajectory is the industry needing to be on? There are many things to be done.

I know that today’s and yesterday’s discussion may have left some people behind in terms of the value that the industry has generated. They point to the fact that properties sell for far greater amounts than the costs. And that their cousin Vinny made a killing in the stock market. Both are true statements. But stock markets should not be confused with earnings in an industry. And we are talking about accounting, not market values of properties. The difference is that the accounting is the basis of valuation and profits of the management of the firm. If the basis is skewed, which I am suggesting that oil and gas is skewed by capitalizing everything and recognizing very little of the capitalized costs. You then skew the basis of the company's earnings. An oil and gas company only needs a few drops of oil in order to report an annual profit. This is not the reality of the situation that is occurring in the industry.

Offsetting these bloated balance sheets is the other side of the issue. Yes they are balanced by the overstated earnings of the producers. But here’s the catch, the producers have not been reporting very good earnings! In light of the fact of the distortions on the balance sheets they should have been reporting windfall profits. This goes to show you how much more valuable the commodities are than what they are being sold for. The other offsetting element to the bloated balance sheets is the amount of equity they have been able to generate from the markets. Which has been substantial. However the largest offsetting element is the debt these firms are carrying. In most cases, large debts based on the reserves, those same reserves used to value the company in the accounting. These bank loans and debt instruments make the producers highly levered.

Back in the 1980’s I did a stint in Touche Ross’ bankruptcy practice. This was during the last time oil and gas producers were going bankrupt. I was surprised by all of the trustees and judges were of the opinion that if the firm had good cash flow then it would be restructured as a viable going concern. Since the SEC and accounting firms implemented full cost accounting practices in the late 1970’s, that’s all I’ve heard about in the oil and gas industry. It has good cash flow. I don’t think this similarity is all that coincidental.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

The Asset Swagger

In oil and gas assets are things that you collect on your balance sheet. The more that you have the bigger the swagger that you can carry off as you walk down the street. These are the governing principles in oil and gas. Shale properties are pursued by bureaucrats because they are consistent with the governing principles of the industry. They are costly, leading to higher balance sheets. Have steep decline curves, which lead to less and less recognition of any depletion of those assets in subsequent years. They are the perfect asset to pursue.

I'm paraphrasing here but I think this is the general operating procedure and logic being employed by the bureaucrats. It seems to be the only logical reason why we are doing what we are doing. At the end of the year the firm will be so much bigger because we blew so much investor money that they'll be impressed. So the bureaucrat thinks. Now that’s performance.

I have argued here on many occasions my difficulties with the capitalization policies used in oil and gas. The SEC dictates that either full cost or successful efforts define the maximum amount that a producer can record as their assets. Either method bloats the balance sheet by including everything under the sun as an asset on the balance sheet. But what accounting firms and bureaucrats don't seem to understand is that the SEC defines the outer limit. Any reasonable business person would look at the balance sheet of a producer and state that it is overstated, or more appropriately, bloated. When did reasonable lose its application to assets in oil and gas? I think it was around 1978.

Assets are not collectables, they are costs that need to flow to the income statement. For a healthy firm and industry, the sooner the better. There is no reason for an industry to be carrying the last two decades of capital expenditures on its balance sheet. The only reason that you would do so is to make the bureaucrats look like they're “performing.” Sure the producers have been reporting profits, but if you never recognize the cost of capital, in a capital intensive industry, you're going to report profits. Note too however, these profits as a result are of the paper variety. If these profits were real, the producers would be flush with cash. Almost no producer has positive working capital. An industry that operates on negative working capital! And they provide no return to their investors, in general. Clearly the overproduction has been endemic for decades fueled by the deception of a profitable industry.

This is a fine critique but what are the alternatives. There are two things that we will be doing in the Preliminary Specification. First is we will be including the cost of capital and actual overhead into the calculations of prices necessary for the Joint Operating Committee to earn a profit. These price calculations will be done on each and every property and well in the industry. They will be accurate and timely. On the basis of these calculations the producers will then be able to determine if the Joint Operating Committee can be produced in the current commodity price environment. If it can produce a profit, then it will produce, otherwise it will be shut-in.

The second element of our policies is that we will employ a different capitalization policy. One that recognizes the costs of exploration and development in a more timely fashion. What is generally considered controllable equipment in the industry, pump jacks, tubing, wellheads, etc will be capitalized. The uncontrollable, and more specifically the intangibles like drilling day work, cementing, logging and fishing will be expensed in the current period. Irrespective of the results of the well. This change in policy will be consistent with the SEC requirements as it does not overstate the assets of the firm.

What these two policies will do is draw down the bloated balance sheets of the producers. Retiring these bloated asset costs and having them recognized for the costs of the business that they are. There would be no more fooling ourselves that producers are profitable. We would need substantially higher prices in order to achieve this profitability. A mechanism, the decentralized production model, is provided in the Preliminary Specification to bring prices to the level where they are covering the costs of the industry. This capitalization policy would also return the capital to the investors who have invested in the industry in good faith over the past decades. That is because the oil and gas industry is a capital intensive industry and oil and gas exploration and development is expensive. Giving the commodities away cheaply as we are doing now is only bankrupting the industry and leading to any number of bad decisions by industry and consumers. This is foolishness and it has to stop.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.