The Preliminary Specification Part CXIX (AV Part XI)

One area that has been difficult for the oil and gas producer to deal with is the volatile energy prices. With the costs of production and reserve replacement increasing and the reserve depletion on such a rapid pace, the decline in energy prices can have a material effect on the value captured from a field. With every producer producing at capacity, this risk of price declines comes into play more frequently then maybe needs to be realized. This blog post asks the question, what if, there was agreement in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace and implementation in the Accounting Vouchers Material Balance Report of the Preliminary Specification, to limit the production at certain thresholds based on predetermined commodity prices?

We can accurately tell what the costs of reserves and production costs are and there are many times when these exceed the prices that are received in the marketplace. The North American natural gas marketplace is a very good example of this situation. Selling at a loss may fuel the short term cash flow situation however, it as at the long term expense of reserve replacements. In a highly innovative oil and gas marketplace, the costs of innovation are being funded by the commodity prices. However, these costs may exceed the temporary fluctuations in the market prices for the commodities. Is it wise for the producer to continue to produce at capacity?

What if the agreement that governs the Joint Operating Committee has the partnership agreeing to a reduction of production by 15% when the price of the commodity drops below x value. And what if the agreement also reduces the production by 25% when the production prices drop below y value. These situations would help to mitigate the loss of earnings on the reserves and not materially affect the cash flow of the operation. The global implications of many producers implementing this type of price based production profile would put a floor on the commodity prices. A floor based on the marginal costs of reserve replacement.

The implementation of the production decreases would be triggered in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace and signaled to the Material Balance Report. One area that we have not yet discussed in detail is the field data capture that is implicit in the Material Balance Report. This signal from the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module would then choke back the production to the 85% threshold when the prices realized are below the level set in the trigger.

Selling at a loss is a fools game. The political issues surrounding the choking back of production are something that might make some wince. However, the reality is that the costs of production and reserve replacement are escalating and the volatility in the commodity prices only seems to becoming more prevalent. With shale gas costs in North America being as high as they are, who would contemplate producing at these prices? In many ways we are our own worst enemies.

This scenario of price driven production adjustments will be part of the Preliminary Specification. If producers decide to use it, it will be there choice. I think it is necessary with the situation in the energy market that the producer has some protection of their investment from the volatility and political influences of the commodity marketplace.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CXVIII (AV Part X)

The interactions between the Accounting Voucher and the Partnership Accounting modules of the Preliminary Specification are naturally quite significant. They both being accounting modules, it is natural that they have high levels of integration. The Accounting Voucher is unique in that it brings to the producer the ability to design transactions and the Material Balance Report. These are not innovations that the producer will use to become more innovative but are provided to ensure that the innovative producers processes are actively defined and supported through out the People, Ideas & Objects application modules.  When the business is a science, as it is in oil and gas, it would be in the producers interest to remain open and flexible in both its scientific and business approach. The Accounting Voucher and Partnership Accounting modules provide that organizational flexibility.

The manner in which these two modules operate is as follows. The Accounting Voucher captures the transactions. Partnership Accounting reports on the transactions. Accounting Vouchers remain open for one accounting period and are subject to the same closing process that is familiar and traditional in the accounting world.

We noted in the Partnership Accounting module how the Work Order enabled the producer with the ability to form and participate in working groups. This flexibility is what is sought in these accounting modules. Elimination of the bureaucratic inertia that impedes these activities today makes these modules critical to a producers innovation as much as the Research & Capabilities or Knowledge & Learning modules do.

Professor Dosi (1988) states that profit motivated agents must involve both “the perception of some sort of opportunity and an effective set of incentives.” (p. 1135) Professor Dosi introduces the theory of Schmookler (1966) and asked “are the observed inter-sectoral differences in innovative investment the outcome of different incentive structures, different opportunities or both”? (p. 1135) Schmookler believed in differing degrees of economic activity derived from the same innovate inputs. It is People, Ideas & Objects assertion that the “different incentive structures” and “different opportunities” are facilitated or constrained by the administrative ease in which the producer operates.

The same can be stated for the Material Balance Report. If the producer is confident that the deal that was conceived is accurately captured in the Accounting Voucher. And the operation is therefore also reporting a substantial profit. Then they know that their innovations are working, their systems are working and the alignment of the legal, financial, operational decision making, cultural, communication, innovation, strategic, compliance and governance frameworks is achieved.

This will be the last post on the Accounting Voucher during our third pass. We will be skipping over the Security & Access Control module as it is not directly involved in the producers innovation. Recall that our third pass is focused on innovation and therefore we will be moving to the Research & Capabilities module of the Preliminary Specification.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CXVII (AV Part IX)

Yesterday’s post detailed the ability for a producer to offset the costs of their capabilities and their development to the various Joint Operating Committees that they participate in. With the expected increase in the earth science and engineering effort in each barrel of oil produced. And the difficulty in increasing the supply of geologists and engineers to meet the demands of the business. The pooling concept has been developed within the People, Ideas & Objects application to deal with the supply and demand of these finite technical resources. It is within the Accounting Voucher of the Preliminary Specification that the automation of the charging for these resources, as detailed in yesterday’s post, enables the producer to earn a return on their investment in their earth science and engineering capabilities.

It comes down to the question of what business is it that the producer is in. Are they in the business of generating profits from producing oil and gas, or are they in the business of generating profits from providing geologists and engineers to the operations they have an interest in? If we look at the competitive advantages of the producer it is the land and asset base, and the earth science and engineering capabilities that they apply to that asset base. Clearly both production and capabilities development are within the scope of the business of the oil and gas producer. And to a large extent the costing of the technical resources in the manner mentioned in yesterdays post is not fundamentally different from what occurs today. In today’s market, the operator is provided with “overhead allowances” for the capture of some of these costs. The difference from today and what is proposed here is that the elimination of the concept of an operator by “pooling” the technical resources of the Joint Operating Committee participants to acquire the necessary capabilities.

To take this opportunity to charge the costs of the capabilities of the producer firm and earn a return on investment may be the issue that some people will have with the concept. In a world where the market for engineers and geologists is highly competitive. And you as a producer are assessed on your performance based on Revenue Per Employee. The acquisition of additional technical resources is a difficult process that has implications to your firm. The ability to offset the costs of your technical resources helps to mitigate these issues in the short term. This is the purpose for enabling the direct billing of technical resources to the joint account in the Accounting Voucher.

When we get to the review of the Research & Capabilities and Knowledge & Learning modules during this innovation review. We will see the development of these capabilities from an innovative point of view will take on a different perspective. The ability to capture this development of a firms technical resources as an investment, and have them as a source of revenue here in the Accounting Voucher is what I want to establish with today’s and yesterday’s posts. Looking at the development of the producer, it is somewhat of a paradox as to which is developed first, the land base or the capabilities. With the ability to have the capabilities generate their own revenue stream the paradox is resolved in the short term, in that capabilities development is expected to earn a return on investment.

Some may suggest that these costs offset the production revenues of the Joint Operating Committee that would have gone to the producer anyways. And that may be true. However, in a world where the demands for the technical resources are expected to be as significant as some suggest. The need to deal with the problem on a wholesale basis, as People, Ideas & Objects pooling concept does, is a requirement, and secondly, the assumption that everyone else will develop their technical capabilities might be false.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CXVI (AV Part VIII)

We return to the Accounting Voucher module of the Preliminary Specification for our focus on innovation. This module works closely with the Partnership Accounting module to capture the accounting for the Joint Operating Committee and the producer firm. If you recall we are introducing many new and innovative concepts to the Accounting Voucher, concepts such as the design of transactions, the comprehensive nature of the Material Balance Report, and the ability for all of the producers within a Joint Operating Committee to post to an open Accounting Voucher.

In this third pass through the Preliminary Specification we are focusing on innovation. And when we get to the Research & Capabilities and Knowledge & Learning modules we will be focusing heavily on the capabilities elements of those modules. With that understanding, and the knowledge that the producer firm is building a substantial technical earth science and engineering capability, we turn to Professor Giovanni Dosi.

Professor Dosi’s paper discusses the role of innovation in the market economy and assumes companies in a free market are willing to invest in science and technologies to advance the competitive nature of their product offering or internal processes. The key aspects of Professor Dosi’s theories that make them directly applicable to oil and gas are the innovation theories application to earth science and engineering disciplines. These disciplines are key to the capability and success of oil and gas firms search, and production of, hydrocarbons. The investment in science and technologies is with the implicit expectation of a return on these investments, but also, to provide the firm with additional structural competitive advantages by moving their products costs and / or capabilities beyond that of the competition. Professor Dosi notes:

Thus, I shall discuss the sources of innovation opportunities, the role of markets in allocating resources to the exploration of these opportunities and in determining the rates and directions of technological advances, the characteristics of the processes of innovative search, and the nature of the incentives driving private agents to commit themselves to innovation.

The producer firm is committing to developing their capabilities with the understanding that they advance their competitive advantages, and, earn a return on their investment. How within the People, Ideas & Objects application does the producer earn a return on their investment in their capabilities? The most obvious answer is through direct charges to the joint account. That is to say that the people (representing the producers capabilities) who are pooled into a Joint Operating Committee, have been assigned a role within the Military Command & Control Metaphor and who’s costs are captured in the Partnership Accounting module are recovering a “revenue” stream for the producers capabilities.

The question then becomes what is the charge for the individual during the time that they are working in the Joint Operating Committee. It will be easy to determine the hours that are worked in the various JOC’s of the technical resources. Whether through the Work Order or through other means, the ability to capture the time spent will be available and accurate in the People, Ideas & Objects system. The hourly rate would need to include a number of factors. The skills of the individual. The technical resources of the producer firm that is at the disposal of the individual. And also a measure of the level of innovativeness of the producer firm, say something like Revenue Per Employee that reflects the overall productivity of the firm.

Once they have factored these elements in they could then assign an hourly rate to each individual in their firm and ensure that so many hours of their year are charged to the various joint accounts that they have an interest in. With the advanced level of systems automation that we are using, we can charge the joint accounts based on the hours worked each month based on the charge out rate of each individual in the producer firm.

The net result of this is that the revenues should exceed the costs and the producer will have captured a return on their investment in the capabilities that they have developed within their firm. To proceed on any other basis would be, I think, unreasonable.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CXV (PA Part XIX)

In this third pass through the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification we have focused on just the elements that support innovation within the oil and gas producer. That should not take away from the comprehensive nature of the module. Today I want to extend that understanding of innovativeness across the whole spectrum of functionality and process management within the module. And provide a sense of where the focus for the user community should reside.

If we go back to the Draft Specifications list of standard reporting output for the Partnership Accounting module we come up with a good understanding of the overall scope of the module. The community of course is uninhibited or constrained in any way by any list or requirement that I have stated here in the Preliminary or Draft Specifications. They are encouraged to add what they feel are necessary functionality, processes or modules.

Where I see a lot of changes occurring is in the level of activity that happens between producers. As the capabilities of the producers are developed, the need to interact will expand and the systems the firms use will need to support these transactions. The ability to support them will have to be done on an “as they happen” basis, as the historical accounting approach will be too costly and disruptive. The need to have the interfaces to the People, Ideas & Objects application modules will need to be developed with the user in mind. Think about iPhone and iPad type of applications and interfaces that are part of the Partnership Accounting module.

Innovation is the objective that we are seeking to develop in the producer firm. It is the difficult and costly element that will drive the organizations focus. The accounting and systems need to be a critical part of that, and be active in supporting this innovation in the Partnership Accounting and other modules.

The development of the Community of Independent Service Providers is also an area that should be kept in mind when considering these software developments requirements in the Preliminary Specification. Is there a better way to develop the interface for a service provider for conducting production accounting on a wholesale basis? These types of opportunities are also the key considerations of the user community during the development of the Preliminary Specification. The division of labor and specialization are keys to a more productive oil and gas industry. And software will both enable and constrain the division of labor and specialization.

Tomorrow we will begin our third pass through the related Accounting Voucher module.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CXIV (PA Part XVIII)

The complexity of the relationships within the Joint Operating Committees has to be captured and accounted for in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification. Whether we are talking about the various forms of contribution that a producer may make to the joint account, or how they may participate in a working group, the bureaucratic machinations of the accounting for these transactions can’t stand in the way of innovativeness of the producers.

The freedom to participate is inhibited by the fact that the business arrangements are difficult to capture and account for. What is needed is the ability to develop software that captures the substance of the manner in which the contributions are being made, and then the manner in which they are accounted for. That is the purpose of the Partnership Accounting module, to support the innovative oil and gas producer in the innovative actions they need to participate in. Once again Professor Giovanni Dosi points out specifically the need for the business aspects to support the technical aspects of the business.

Internalization and routinization in the face of the uncertainty and complexity of the innovative process also point to the importance of particular organizational arrangements for the success or failure of individual innovative attempts. This is what was found by the SAPPHO Project (cf. Science Policy Research Unit 1972 and Rothwell et al. 1974), possibly the most extensive investigation of the sources of commercial success or failure of innovation: Institutional traits, both internal to the firm - such as the nature of the organizational arrangements between technical and commercial people, or the hierarchical authority within the innovating firm - and between a firm and its external environment - such as good communication channels with users, universities, and so on - turn out to be very important. Moreover, it has been argued (Pavitt 1986; Robert Wilson, Peter Ashton and Thomas Egan 1984) that, for given incentives and innovative opportunities, the various forms of internal corporate organization (U form versus M form centralized versus decentralized, etc.) affect innovation and commercial success positively or negatively, according to the particular nature of each technological paradigm and its stage of development. p. 1135

Capturing the context of the deals made in both the Joint Operating Committee and working groups as described here in the Preliminary Specification can’t be done on an historical basis. What is needed is for the software to be sophisticated enough for the deal makers to be using while formulating the deal, to capture the substance of the deal, so that it will be used to allocate the costs and charge their accounting systems for these costs when they are incurred. Then and only then will the accountants have a chance of keeping up with the speed and innovativeness of the industry as it is contemplated here.

This is the necessary part of the People, Ideas & Objects software development team and most importantly, the user community. It won’t be too difficult to capture the multiple and myriad ways in which a deal can be formulated. The algorithm will be complex but with time and money it can certainly be done. The real difficult aspect of making this critical part of the Partnership Accounting module work is the user interface. Having the ability of the user to intuitively use the module to capture their understanding of their part of the deal, capture it in the People, Ideas & Objects system and account for it on that basis. That is what is necessary to make this innovation possible.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CXIII (PA Part XVII)

It is here in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification that we find the competitive advantage of the People, Ideas & Objects application modules. We have discussed in this third pass through the Partnership Accounting module the Work Order system and briefly the division of labor and specialization. Today I want to highlight these two points and show how they relate to the innovativeness of the oil and gas producer, People, Ideas & Objects value proposition and the competitive advantages we offer the oil and gas industry.

As a producer, your competitive advantages reside in your land and asset base. They also reside in your earth science and engineering capabilities that you can apply to your land and asset base. In terms of the capabilities that you have developed in handling the accounting nuances of foreign currencies. Capabilities such as these don’t provide too much in terms of your competitive advantage or overall value to the firm. They are however, a necessity and a cost of doing business, but not a core capability. They can best be attained through the Community of Independent Service Providers that are affiliated with People, Ideas & Objects. And in that sense these accounting services provide an enhancement to the competitive advantages of the oil and gas producer.

It is through the enhanced division of labor and specialization that is at the core of People, Ideas & Objects software modules that we find the realization of the producer firms competitive advantages. Without the enhanced division of labor, that requires the software to identify and support the processes, the producer would not be able to approach the larger volumes of oil and gas production. In addition to providing this strong competitive advantage to the producer firms, use of People, Ideas & Objects software applications also provides the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. The most profitable means of oil and gas operations is achieved through our value proposition of allocating the costs of the software development across the subscribing base of producers, once. Therefore, being the lowest cost software provider, enabling each producer with the highest probable production output; lays the foundation to our claim that we provide the most profitable means of oil and gas operations.

But there’s more. In addition to the controversial claims that I have already made. The way that the eleven module Preliminary Specification enables and unleashes the innovativeness in producer firms is evident in many ways. Here in the Partnership Accounting module, in the Work Order system we see how it provides producers with the ability to collaborate and seek knowledge. These, as you may recall, are what Professor Giovanni Dosi calls technical trade-offs. And these trade-offs facilitate the ability for industries to innovate on the changing technical and scientific paradigms. Crucial to the facilitation of these trade-offs is a fundamental component that spurs the change and is usually abundant and available at low costs. For innovation to occur in oil and gas, People, Ideas & Objects asserts that the ability to seek and find knowledge, and to collaborate are two “commodities” that are abundant today. With their inherent low direct costs, knowledge and collaboration are the triggers for a number of technical paradigms which will provide companies with fundamental innovations. The Work Order system as described in the past few days eliminates the bureaucracy as an impediment in making these working groups form. Unleashing the collaborations and seeking of knowledge.

This blog post is a hard sell of the attributes of the Preliminary Specification. What so much of our organizations and the people that work within them do from now on is defined and determined by the software that is used. We need to take control of the production of the software, to take control of the means of production. That is what People, Ideas & Objects is about.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CXII (PA Part XVI)

When we last discussed the division of labor and specialization in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification. It was with respect to the pooling of the technical resources of the Joint Operating Committees. This pooling was necessary in order to attain the necessary technical capabilities for the operations that the properties required. Today I want to talk about the division of labor and specialization that can occur in the Partnership Accounting module from the point of view of the accounting that can take place through the Community of Independent Service Providers and other means.

Our third pass through the Preliminary Specification focuses on innovation specifically. Our last few days concentration on the Work Order provides an understanding of how the Work Order provides the innovative oil and gas producer with the ability to increase their capabilities by participation in small working groups on an ad-hoc basis. Recall too, our past discussions on the Material Balance Report and the way it encapsulates the production and accounting information for a property within an Accounting Voucher, which for its purposes is the same as a Joint Operating Committee.

We have also discussed the many other aspects of the Partnership Accounting module. From accounting cut-offs to currencies, the scope of the application to the standard list of accounting output. However, we have never discussed how the division of labor and specialization may affect the Partnership Accounting module specifically. We have discussed in other modules like the Petroleum Lease module, with the scenario of using the lease rental process. And the specialization that an accounting provider could bring the producer by focusing on royalty compliance in the Compliance & Governance module.

If we now think how the industry could be organized in a manner to specialize the accounting to better handle the accounting requirements in the Partnership Accounting module we see many opportunities. The Material Balance Report requires seriously advanced accounting skills. The understanding of the industry, and the understanding of the property has to be well understood to correctly account for all of the aspects of the property. Another element that makes this accounting perspective differ is that there is no real operator designation in the future. With each producer contributing what they can to the joint account, the ability for one company to be designated operator, particularly from an accounting overhead point of view, may be to onerous to consider. Instead, the more reasonable approach might be for the Joint Operating Committee to hire a service provider to conduct the accounting on behalf of the partners in the JOC. This service provider could be organized to manage the Material Balance Report for a variety of producers who have interests in a certain geographical region.

Within that service provider they may have people organized in a manner that focuses on the process and prepares the accounting in a fundamentally different manner then it would be done if it were done at one producer firm. Other specialized accounting firms may specialize in accounting for the Work Order process, or even just accounting for currencies. The point being that the specialization necessary to have the accounting requirements “on staff” at each producer firm will also be seen as to great of a luxury for any one producer. The ability to access these talents through other means will have to be provided. And the demand for these talents will grow as the volume of activity in the industry accelerates as it is expected to do. Therefore the need to expand the supply, with the somewhat fixed resources that we have today, and to provide a better quality of service, can only be provided through the further division of labor and specialization.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CXI (PA Part XV)

I’m going to continue on one more day with the scenario of using the Work Order system across multiple producers. Today I will use this scenario to show how the Partnership Accounting module’s integrated nature with the other modules of the Preliminary Specification provides value to these ad-hoc working groups. Also why they are such an important element of innovation in oil and gas.

We used the scenario in the context of engineering, however it could just as easily be used in the area of geology or any other area of oil and gas interest. It could also include the supplier or vendor marketplace to form a working group in that area. The importance of the way the Work Order works is that the producer or participant is able to designate how they are going to participate in the working group. Prior to their approval they are to allocate the source of the funds and where the costs will ultimately go as a result of their participation. This being conducted by each participant or producer in the working group, all within the same interface for the same Work Order in the People, Ideas & Objects Partnership Accounting module.

One of the most obvious areas that this interface will interact with the other modules is the Security & Access Control module. Access to the Work Order will need to be unlimited for a certain point in time and then need to be closed to the existing members of the working group. This will need to be an interesting point in time when the search for participants reaches a threshold and the people feel the substance for a working group exists. Then only those who are within the working group, or are subsequently granted direct access are able to participate directly in the working group.

With the Security & Access Control module we also inherit the Military Command & Control Metaphor that allows the people to impose a chain of command across the working group. This might be something that they want to do if they have a difficult task or a large group of people. The opportunity to do so is available to them if they so desire as this is part of the Security & Access Control modules core functionality.

The designation of the source of the funds and where the costs will go is coded directly to those accounts. This has the Work Order taking on elements of the Accounting Voucher module in terms of how it operates. Each producers accounting system will be charged, upon approval of the Work Order, according to the way in which they have coded the Work Order. Therefore in that instance it will take on many of the attributes of the Accounting Voucher module.

I see these working groups, as we have called them here, as an important element of how an innovative oil and gas industry identifies and solve the problems that it faces. Professor Dosi states “In very general terms, technological innovation involves or is the solution to problems.” Dosi goes on to further define this as “In other words, an innovative solution to a certain problem involves “discovery” (of the problem) and “creation” since no general algorithm can be derived from the information about the problems. Solutions to technological problems involve the use of information derived from experience and formal knowledge. It is the specific and un-codified capabilities, or “tacit-ness” as Professor Dosi describes “on the part of the inventors who discover the creative solution.”

It is therefore asked specifically, how can the knowledge, information and capability of oil and gas firms solve the technical and scientific problems of the future? How can a firm more effectively employ its capability to solve problems and facilitate the discovery of new problems and creation of their solutions? Clearly some companies are more effective at this process then others, but this research in oil and gas asks, is there a means for an organization to provide a quantum increase in its ability to innovate that leads to higher trajectories of performance based on production revenue per employee?

Having these working groups spawn at will without the bureaucratic and accounting logistical nightmare that they instill today will be an important first step in making the industry more innovative.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CX (PA Part XIV)

Today I want to continue on with the scenario that we have been discussing regarding the Work Order system in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification. Yesterday we discussed how one producer could participate in a study with other producers by setting up a Work Order to capture their involvement. Their contribution involved one engineer, some office space and computer time. That they would contribute some cash was also a possibility as they signed on for a total of 10% of the projects projected costs. Today I want to talk about the other producers involvement and how the Work Order system, being a multi-organizational system, is able to capture the different ways in which each producer will participate and account for these differences within the People, Ideas & Objects Partnership Accounting module.

The emphasis is once again on the ability of these producers to innovate. The collaborations and interactions between producers and participants in the industry will be the source of many of the innovations that occur in the future. The impediment to doing these as a result of the bureaucracy and the current suite of accounting systems in use in the oil and gas industry is what I want to draw a contrast to in this scenario using the Work Order. Its time in this day and age that the systems become as complex and as sophisticated as what is being described here so that the innovation in the earth science and engineering disciplines can occur. Professor Giovanni Dosi expands on this point further in the following quotation.

Additional issues include the conditions controlling occupational and geographical mobility and or consumer promptness / resistance to change, market conditions, financial facilities and capabilities and the criteria used to allocate funds. Microeconomic trends in the effects on changes in relative prices of inputs and outputs, including public policy. (regulation, tax codes, patent and trademark laws and public procurement.)

Within the project that the producers want to participate in. Some want to contribute a variety of different resources, some have specialized capabilities that are critical to the project and others are more or less along for the ride and are willing to participate by paying cash. Some have an AFE that has been approved that can direct the funds to pay for their participation. Some will incur the costs as part of their annual payroll budget for engineering. Still others have a working interest partner that are willing to share the costs over a number of Joint Operating Committees. The combinations and permutations of how a Work Order gets financed and funded are unlimited when we consider the number of different ways producers can participate.

Now to have a Work Order system that takes the information from these various parties and assimilates the understanding of the deal from the five or six people who have the “meeting of the minds” to initiate this project is the critical point in which to start. Each needs to codify their understanding of how their participation of the costs are funded and costed to their People, Ideas & Objects Partnership Accounting modules Work Order. All of the participants are using the one Work Order that is shared across all of the producers. This agreements understanding needs to be captured within the Work Order system prior to its approval by all of the producers. Much like an Accounting Voucher the costs need to be coded, but also the sources of the funds need to be identified. This way the system can process the charge within the firm in the manner that it was expected to be. For any charges that are above the threshold that a firm was willing to commit to, that imputes that another firms cash commitment would be provided to cover those costs. The Work Order should make these cash transactions between these producers as a result of the approval of the document. The point of the exercise is that once the Work Order is approved, the understanding of the deal, as captured by the interface, is executed.

As I indicated two days ago the ability for an accountant to follow on with the necessary accounting for these transaction requires significant recreation of the “deal” and time of the parties who conceived of the deal in the first place. A bureaucratic waste of time. The interface of the Work Order should be sophisticated enough to be able to capture the substance of the deal in what ever permutation and combination that is conceived of by the originators. I understand the myriad ways that these can be done and the difficulty in making an interface that captures these. That I don’t think is the difficult part. What I think would be the difficult part would be to make an interface that provides these services in a manner that is simple and easy to use, and captures the deals substance. I, however, know it can be done, and the reason it hasn’t been done is that the budget for software developments like these have not been set out. Its at times like these that people should revisit our revenue model and rethink People, Ideas & Objects approach based on our projected budget.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CIX (PA Part XIII)

In yesterday’s blog post we discussed the role that the Work Order system would have in clearing up the administrative minutia of the accounting related issues of the Partnership Accounting module in the Preliminary Specification. Today I want to continue on with that discussion and ask what that has to do with innovation. It is this third pass through the Preliminary Specification that we are focusing on the topic of innovation and it seems that accounting related issues are a bit distant from the concerns of the innovative oil and gas producer. Or are they.

Lets look at the Work Order system from the perspective of a successful producer who is active in the marketplace and has developed an earth science and engineering capability that scores well in terms of Revenue Per Employee. The CEO is approached by one of the engineers who hears of several other producers who are conducting a study on something of interest to your firm. They are looking for other participants to join in and you want the engineer that brought the news to join in the project. Assuming everyone of the producers was using the Work Order system they would be able to pool the resources they have within the Work Order that was set up to manage the project. You were able to commit to a 10% share of the x costs and would offset those costs with your engineers time and use of office space and some computer resources. (Note all costs are pre-approved and budgeted from other accounts.) With the Work Order you were able to make these commitments subject to the other 90% being committed to, and then your approval would be automatic.

We have here the means of which the people who are working within the industry to commit to programs and projects in a manner that is natural to their business. This is the way that the systems should be working in 2011. What we have today is an impediment to the operator in the industry who feels that participation in the study with the other producers would be worthwhile, however, the accounting and approval nightmare will haunt him for the next three quarters and subject him to such regulatory oversight as to question his moral integrity. So instead the project doesn’t proposed, funded, participated in or get done.

In Professor Dosi’s paper “The Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation” he discusses the role that such administrative minutia have on innovation.

The discussion will aim to identify (a) the main characteristics of the innovative process, (b) the factors that are conducive to or hinder the development of new processes of production and new products, and (c) the processes that determine the selection of particular innovations and their effects on industrial structures. 

In our example the financial resources are there. The motivation exists within the organization to do a spectacular job on the project. What happens is the bureaucracy gets in the way and slows things down and makes it a task that requires superhuman effort to even try. And maybe one or two projects will get done each year on the basis of sheer will. But what is needed is the ability to conduct a volume of projects that is far in excess of one or two, and that is beyond the scope of the organizational context as the producers are organized today. Without the ERP systems to define and support these innovative processes, these processes will not spontaneously appear.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part CVIII (PA Part XII)

Lets be clear, what People, Ideas & Objects are proposing in the Preliminary Specifications Partnership Accounting module is nothing like any other joint venture accounting system. When we begin to account for the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct. Align all of the frameworks of the producer and the JOC together. And then unleash the innovativeness in both the producer and the JOC, the accounting becomes a torrent of activity where no transaction is the same as any other. A little poetic license helps my writing style.

Some of the processes that we have described in the Preliminary Specification have been comprehensive and involve multiple organizations, over multiple accounting periods. Whether that’s the development of capabilities that begins in the Research & Capabilities module, touches on the Resource Marketplace and Financial Marketplace modules, and passes through to the Knowledge & Learning module. Some of these processes carry transactions that are as complex and as difficult to quantify as the process. Some will be for the joint account, some will be for the producer to incur on their own and as we learned in the Financial Marketplace module some transactions might be as a result of an investment being made by an investment group.

We discussed the Work Order system that was able to control the costs associated with a project. The projects contained within a Work Order might be funded by an AFE or a budgeted account, and as a result will be able to control the costs of the project, monitor them and maintain a governance through the use of the Military Command & Control Metaphor of the People, Ideas & Objects system. The Work Order system will be able to designate the ability to charge out the costs to the appropriate owners of the projects at the initialization of the Work Order. Since the Work Order is a multi-organizational system, that is members of a Joint Operating Committee or members of the field services industries will be able to participate in a Work Order, which means they will then have the ability to pre-approve and participate in the project. The accountant working within the Partnership Accounting module won’t therefore be running around trying to seek approval from partners to approve the expenditures to projects that didn’t get approved properly. If everyone within the industry only works to a chargeable work order, and all work orders are approved by those who will be financially responsible for the charges, then the accountants job in chasing their tail is over.

The point of the Work Order system is hopefully not lost on others in the industry. Some may feel that the Work Order duplicates the attributes of the AFE, and I would argue that they are fundamentally different. The AFE approves spending for field level and construction projects of a capital nature. The Work Order system is a means to deploy the capabilities of the producer or JOC in an authorized manner. When we are able to extend the Work Order system across multiple producers, JOC’s and suppliers, the ability to deploy the capabilities of multiple organizations will facilitate the innovativeness that we are seeking in the oil and gas industry. The Work Order may take budget dollars from multiple AFE’s and assign them to a team of engineers that are asked to develop the process necessary to make their firm more capable. Or, departmental budget dollars from two producers may be contributed to a Work Order for their Geologists to attend a conference and conduct research on some promising development. The simple point being that no one does any work without a Work Order to charge their time to, and no Work Order can collect charges that hasn’t had their budget pre-approved.

This will make the Partnership Accounting module workable from the point of view of controlling the costs of the multitude of different arrangements being made within the organization. If the accountants are tasked with trying to put together the costs and determine who is to be charged after the fact, this is how they become the annoying bothersome people they can become. By imposing the Work Order system in this fashion, within the Partnership Accounting module, the arrangements are pre-made and the authorizations are required before the charges can be incurred. Making the accounting for the deployment of capabilities systematic as opposed to problematic.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CVII (FM Part XIII)

In this last post of our third pass through the Financial Marketplace module of the Preliminary Specification I want to focus on the role that the financial community can have in its participation in making the producer innovative. And how that producer, through the Financial Marketplace module, can accelerate their innovativeness and enhance their capabilities.

What we have learned about innovation is well summarized by Professor Giovanni Dosi in the following quotation.

“businesses commit to innovation stemming from exogenous scientific factors and endogenously accumulated capabilities developed by their respective firms”. His general point is that “observed sectoral patterns of technical change are the result of the interplay between various sorts of market-inducements, on the one hand, and opportunity and appropriability combinations, on the other”. p. 1141

The manner in which the oil and gas investor earns a return on their investment will be on the basis of the producers innovativeness. From that investors point of view, using the public interface of the People, Ideas & Objects Financial Marketplace module they can quickly determine whom has the highest trajectory change in terms of Revenue Per Employee. They will then be able to engage with that producer in terms of what their team is capable of in the earth science and engineering disciplines. And then commence collaborations with those producers that are of interest to the investor on the basis of what they have seen in the Financial Marketplace module. Then the producer and the investor can discuss how the financing of the “interplay between various sorts of market-inducements, on the one hand, and opportunity and appropriability combinations, on the other” can come about.

The efficient financing of innovation on an industry wide basis should be one of the overall processes managed by the Financial Marketplace module. As described here, and understanding that there is much more to be written about the Preliminary Specification, the ability to focus on the producer with the highest level of innovation, as reflected in the trajectory change in Revenue Per Employee, will be quick. As the pace of change in the science, and the rapid pace of change in the service industries, the pace of change in the producers will only be matched if the investment community is able to respond to the market changes at the same speed as the producers are able to. Therefore in order to accelerate the producers it is necessary to accelerate the pace and speed of the financial community in terms of their capabilities in understanding the producers business. This is the focus of the Financial Marketplace module.

In terms of what the capabilities of the producer are, and what they are able to achieve, I can see some producers unwilling to document and publish this material for reasons that they will leave themselves exposed to competitive exploitation. That’s always possible, however, as with any competitive advantage they can be actively marketed and developed or hidden and atrophied. The ability to market these competitive advantages to the investment community and in turn develop them further is the opportunity being discussed here. The paradox of Revenue Per Employee is the area where the difficulties really lay and where their attentions should really be focused.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CVI (FM Part XII)

With this blog post I want to clarify some of the positions and directions that have been discussed in the Preliminary Specification to date, and make clear those that are pertinent to the Financial Marketplace module. These may or may not have been discussed specifically in this module and need some further clarification.

In our review of Professor Giovanni Dosi’s paper, “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation“ we should ask what are the incentives for the financial marketplace to invest in the producers discovery of innovations and there development? Will these depend on the incentives that interested and motivated agents perceive in terms of expected economic returns? Professor Dosi calls “appropriability those properties of technological knowledge and technical artifacts, of markets and the legal environment that permit innovations as rent yielding assets against competitor’s imitation”. In previous blog posts we have documented that producers have lead times and learning curves as process innovations. Are these incentives enough of a market inducement for profit motivated agents?

The competitive advantages of the producer are its land & asset base, and its earth science & engineering capabilities. To develop its capabilities it has been suggested here in the Financial Marketplace module that the financial community will have an incentive in funding the development of the producers capabilities. These competitive advantages, the capabilities, when applied to their land & asset base will generate the rent yielding assets the financial community is seeking. To hold the land & asset base is the alternative the investor has to consider. However, without the capabilities to develop the properties the assets are of little use. The investor must acquire the capabilities in some fashion and that will cost them. To develop them through a producer may be the most effective and lowest cost alternative available to them.

Another aspect of the understanding that we have learned about innovation is that innovation is the result of a quantifiable and replicable process. Taken from the perspective of an investor, the value this understanding provides is that the means of production, the scientific capability is within the scope of his / her undertaking. The risks still exist. However, the ability to develop the innovation from a known capability exists and is a possibility based on a quantifiable and replicable processes. That is not to say that they will be successful, there are still impediments to their success, however, just as Apple is able to produce dominant market changing products, the quantification of innovation is possible and probable.

Lastly the final point of today’s post is that money is not necessarily the determinant of innovative success. If it were there would be more innovation occurring in the large firms. Innovation can and does come from anywhere and does not necessarily require the vast financial resources that are believed to be necessary to make them real. From the financial marketplace perspective this would provide them with the evidence they don’t need to throw a lot of money around to make the producers innovative. A lot of the capabilities that are needed can and will be developed in innovative ways as a result of not having an unlimited capital budget. This might be the key point that draws the capital marketplace into the Financial Marketplace module and participates in the development of the capabilities of the producer.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CV (FM Part XI)

With such a focus on the earth science and engineering capabilities of the innovative oil and gas producer we run the risk of becoming to focused on the science. Revenue Per Employee will go a long way to keeping the producer focused on the business end of the calculation. But there has to be more. And some times that “more” comes from the cold hard slap in the face from the money markets telling you that you’ve been wrong about something for a long time. How can we incorporate some feedback within the Financial Marketplace module of the Preliminary Specification, so that it doesn’t get to the point where the producer has to sustain that humbling cold hard slap from the financial community.

We have discussed the promotion of the producers team of earth science and engineering capabilities on the Financial Marketplace module in our October 20, 2011 blog post. It is through that interface the producer communicates to the financial marketplace the capabilities that they have assembled and what they as a producer are able to accomplish. I see the long term development of the producer as an extension of this capabilities development. The application of the capability and its development to a geographic area where the risks are of a certain nature and are unknown and unknowable for the foreseeable future. This is the nature of the oil and gas business and to embark on such an adventure without the financial marketplace committed to your team would be unwise and certain to fail. What is needed is a means to communicate on top of the capabilities interface that we discussed earlier, and include what Professor Giovanni Dosi states here.

Internalization and routinization in the face of the uncertainty and complexity of the innovative process also point to the importance of particular organizational arrangements for the success or failure of individual innovative attempts. This is what was found by the SAPPHO Project (cf. Science Policy Research Unit 1972 and Rothwell et al. 1974), possibly the most extensive investigation of the sources of commercial success or failure of innovation: Institutional traits, both internal to the firm - such as the nature of the organizational arrangements between technical and commercial people, or the hierarchical authority within the innovating firm - and between a firm and its external environment - such as good communication channels with users, universities, and so on - turn out to be very important. Moreover, it has been argued (Pavitt 1986; Robert Wilson, Peter Ashton and Thomas Egan 1984) that, for given incentives and innovative opportunities, the various forms of internal corporate organization (U form versus M form centralized versus decentralized, etc.) affect innovation and commercial success positively or negatively, according to the particular nature of each technological paradigm and its stage of development. p. 1135

It sounds simple, and reasonable, to include “good communication channels” as a necessary part of any relationship between an innovative producer and its financial backers. To include these within the ERP systems is the key to making them effective. What originates as a result of these “good communication channels” is defined by Professor Dosi.

In general, each organizational arrangement of a firm embodies procedures for resource allocation to particular activities (in our case, innovative activities), and for the efficient use of these resources in the search for new products, new processes, and procedures for improvements in existing routines; however, the specific nature of these procedures differs across firms and sectors. For example, the typical degrees of commitment of resources vary by industry and so do the rates at which learning occurs. I now turn to the interpretation of these phenomena. p. 1135

Professor Dosi states that profit motivated agents must involve both “the perception of some sort of opportunity and an effective set of incentives.” (p. 1135) Professor Dosi introduces the theory of Schmookler (1966) and asked “are the observed inter-sectoral differences in innovative investment the outcome of different incentive structures, different opportunities or both”? (p. 1135) Schmookler believed in differing degrees of economic activity derived from the same innovate inputs. One would assume that this is the calm guiding hand of the capital markets providing leadership to the producer.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CIV (FM Part X)

This blog post is a follow on post to yesterday’s discussion of Revenue Per Employee and why it is important that it is promoted on the Financial Marketplace module of the Preliminary Specification. If you have not read People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model it might be worth your while to have a read. Within that document we make a bold assertion that goes something like this.

In addition to providing a strong competitive advantage to the producer firms, use of People, Ideas & Objects (PI&O) software applications would also provide the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. Recall this is the competitive advantage of this software development project and its Community of Independent Service Providers. We will provide this value added process to the innovative producer by ensuring that the most effective division of labor and specialization, defined and supported by the PI&O software, are used in the day to day operations of the oil and gas producer.

Simply if the output of the industry is going to expand it has to be done on the basis of an enhanced division of labor and specialization. To do that, in this day and age, requires that software be built to define and support those processes first and foremost. PI&O’s Revenue Model is not abusing this fact to state that the industry can’t get to an expanded division of labor without us. We are only stating that we can use these facts as our collective sense of urgency to ensure that this project gets finished.

In theory, Revenue Per Employee will therefore increase under People, Ideas & Objects use. Due to the organizational structure, the Joint Operating Committee supporting the earth science and engineering innovations, the specialization and enhanced division of labor expanding the output of the producer. All as a result of the software defining and supporting the organization, the division of labor, specialization, etc.

Revenue Per Employee is therefore a reflection of value. When we discussed the factor in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module it was for internal consumption purposes. The purpose of using Revenue Per Employee in the Financial Marketplace module is to publish it and allow the investment community to compare your performance against your peers. As we discussed in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module there would be three types of variances that could be calculated on the comparisons between periods. There would be the volume, price and number of employees variance. Each would impute a different result in terms of what the comparison of the variable meant.

Does Revenue Per Employee reflect a more innovative footing. That may be debated for a long time. I think it clearly does, and I can’t think of a more effective means of answering how innovative a producer is. Professor Dosi states “In very general terms, technological innovation involves or is the solution to problems.” Dosi goes on to further define this as “In other words, an innovative solution to a certain problem involves “discovery” (of the problem) and “creation” since no general algorithm can be derived from the information about the problems. Solutions to technological problems involve the use of information derived from experience and formal knowledge. It is the specific and un-codified capabilities, or “tacit-ness” as Professor Dosi describes “on the part of the inventors who discover the creative solution.” The net result of this, in a laboratory setting would be great experiments. The net result of this in a commercial setting like an oil and gas firm would be increased revenue over the period without the additional burden of increased overhead. Therefore Revenue Per Employee, in my opinion should have its own interface in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace, and be published as well on the Financial Marketplace module.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CIII (FM Part IX)

In yesterday’s post we asked the important question of what role will the capital markets play in the future of the oil and gas industry? More specifically, I want to ask what role will they play in funding innovation? Will they value the capabilities of the innovative producer and fund them as was suggested yesterday? Will the demand for capital be diminished as a result of the high commodity prices reallocating the financial resources towards an innovative producer? What role will banks fill in this costly science and engineering based environment? These are all difficult questions that have to be asked in funding the oil and gas producer. Since the 2008 financial meltdown there is definitely change in the air.

With the Financial Marketplace module of the Preliminary Specification the attempt to keep the producer within the financial market is the objective. As the answers to these questions are worked out in the market the producer will be able to participate and resolve the issues in their favor. The risks associated with taking too much time to resolve these issues will fall unfavorably on the producer.

Recently we discussed in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module the factor that was developed in People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Research report of Revenue Per Employee. I think it might be worthwhile to publish the producers Revenue Per Employee factor for the current and past periods, and include some of the future projections of where the producers factor is heading. This would provide the investors and bankers with an understanding of the innovative standing that the firm was expecting to maintain over the next few periods.

One of the attributes of Revenue Per Employee is that your history becomes a significant part of the calculation. If you have a poor factor then the performance of those fields will continue to affect your performance in the calculation from that point forward. Laggards remain laggards. To change requires significant and radical changes to the way the firm operates. Those firms that have a high factor are those that are able to truly state that they are innovative. And they have the benefit of that history in which they will be able to live off those high factors for the short and medium term. This factor can be a significant selling point, or alternatively, highlight the real stinkers.

The variance in the marketplace of the factor of Revenue Per Employee is truly remarkable. I haven’t run the calculations lately but to have a variance of five fold is not uncommon. When a producer has five times as much revenue per employee as its competitor then it reflects that something is fundamentally different in terms of what they are doing. As we stated in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module, although not necessarily an overall reflection of innovativeness, the trajectory of the factor over a period of time is definitely a reflection of innovativeness, or not.

The Financial Marketplace should be a place where the factor of Revenue Per Employee should be highlighted and the trajectories promoted. I will leave it to the user community to determine where in the interface of the Financial Marketplace module to put it. I think the demand for capital in the global economy will continue to be substantial for the long term. In a capital intensive business those with the access to capital will have an advantage. And that advantage will go to those that can prove they are outperforming their competition on the basis of a more innovative footing.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part CII (FM Part VIII)

We now begin our third pass through the Financial Marketplace module of the Preliminary Specification. As has been mentioned this third pass is focused on innovation and reviews Professor Giovanni Dosi’s 1988 paper “Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation”. It has been argued throughout the writings in this blog that commodity prices are reallocating the financial resources to fuel the innovative oil and gas producer. If that is so, then what role will the capital markets play in the future of the oil and gas industry?

Taking this thinking to its extreme then the most innovative firm would also be the most profitable. As the costs of capital would be lower then its competitions, and with their innovations being on a steeper trajectory, and therefore more effective, and would be at less cost then the competitions. The investment in science and technologies is with the implicit expectation of a return on these investments, but also, to provide the firm with additional structural competitive advantages by moving their products costs and / or capabilities beyond that of the competition. Professor Dosi notes:

Thus, I shall discuss the sources of innovation opportunities, the role of markets in allocating resources to the exploration of these opportunities and in determining the rates and directions of technological advances, the characteristics of the processes of innovative search, and the nature of the incentives driving private agents to commit themselves to innovation.

What you are capable of achieving as an innovative oil and gas producer is possibly the most valuable asset that you have in the very near future. This capability is what you are investing in and how you expect to earn a return on your investment. Although much of your capability may be funded by the day to day of your operation, it represents a critical part of your firms investments. In answer to the question posed earlier, this investment in your capabilities is a future role for the capital markets to make investments in.

We noted that the producer firms engineering and earth science team was being highlighted in an interface on the Financial Marketplace module in the October 20, 2011 blog post. Is it time that the producer was able to financially leverage these capabilities in the capital markets? If innovation is the result of the team that is put together, then the ability to fund that team and earn a return on the basis of their performance might be something that should or could be considered in this new energy era.

To facilitate that possibility the interface in the Financial Marketplace module could have performance metrics that reflect the results of their efforts. These could be quantified over a certain period and verified by reserve reports prepared by independent engineers. The point of the exercise would be to increase the value of the producer firm based on the intangible value of its capabilities. In a world where ideas matter, the ability to quantify them and qualify them within a marketplace brings real value to the oil and gas producer and investor.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. Email me here if you need an invite.