Google IPv6 2008 Conference

IPv6 is a cornerstone of the People, Ideas & Objects technical vision, and a critical component of the Draft Security & Access Control Module specification, and for that matter the entire People, Ideas & Objects application. Google held a 2008 IPv6 Conference and have posted several videos of it on YouTube. (Here, here and here.) The last video of the series provides a question and answer forum that is moderated by Google Vice-President Vint Cerf. Vint Cerf is the individual at arpanet that decided on the 32 bit addressing space in IPv4. Additional representation from Google and Cisco and many other vendors discuss some of the issues, opportunities and desires of this future technology.

An interesting comment about the Apple product line was made by one of the commenter's. Noting that Apple was implementing an inside / outside type of thinking that is inconsistent with the IPv6 protocol's. All Apple hardware and software are IPv6 capable until the user turns it off. As a result you are able to use the technology, for yourself, with the full advantages of IPv6. IPv6 is about peer to peer networking and the elimination of the client-server mindset. Apple's products provide a work around where you can view the screen on your home computer at your work, or anywhere you may be in the world. This is done through making a gateway out of their wireless, and hence making the commenter's point temporarily valid.

The second video has the Cisco Technology Product Manager Patrick Grossetete stating "There is no reason to make an application that doesn't use both IPv4 and IPv6 today." It is my opinion that most of the applications operating within the oil and gas industry are not IPv6, and I can say this as most of the applications currently in oil and gas are unaware that their is a network outside of the Intranet in which the operate.

Why is IPv6 a cornerstone of the People, Ideas & Objects technical vision? IPv6 enables 2 to the power of 128 addressing, enabling every device made and ever to be made to have its own static IP address. Enabling the device to be monitored and controlled. Innovation of earth sciences and engineering disciplines are sciences that deal with time, pressure and temperature. Things that can therefore be controlled and monitored. What better way for an industry to have to make this change then through a dedicated software development capability, such as People, Ideas & Objects is offering.

Technorati Tags: People's, Vision, Change, Development,

The Draft Petroleum Lease Marketplace Module.

Its out and can be downloaded from the old wiki site, or email me for a copy. I'll be moving on to the Accounting Voucher Module and Partnership Accounting Module draft specifications.

Two areas I thought would be interesting to see get built are a capital budgeting component for each Joint Operating Committee (JOC). Where I draw the analogy to the new Google Health system. A system where individual privacy concerns are upheld. Yet there is some real value in the aggregated data. Particularly from a research point of view. I suggested that if each JOC can agree to a 3 - 5 year capital budget / plan. Then when the information is aggregated across the entire industry. And that information is presented to the vendors, through a Google Earth type of interface. Then we would see the innovative ways that the vendor marketplace could begin to provide those products and services to the producers.

The other area that is of interest is the live nature of the agreements paragraphs. As each agreement is negotiated certain terms and conditions are captured in the document, and, provide the underlying system with the data and algorithms that will be used in administering the agreement. An important point should also be made that these are just broad strokes of what the systems will need and want. The community now begins to add their input and the real innovation will be seen.

There are now two draft specifications that have been submitted to the community. The remaining 9 will be completed over the next year. Putting deadlines on the community, as it is just forming seems unreasonable so we will discuss these deadlines as things move along.

Technorati Tags: People's, Innovation, Specification, PLM,

Open Source is democratic.

Users and Developers need to think of this system as theirs. For that is what it is. A place where Developers and Users can come together and solve the energy industries problems, through new and innovative software. These development are the beginning of how people will sign-on to the system to do their work. Where the daily commute is replaced by the daily access. Where people are engaged by producers to conduct their administrative, management and business activities on-line, irrespective of their location.

Not everybody has an idea to contribute and not every contribution is an idea. It will take all different kinds of people to make the application that is needed to do the job. Maybe someone will find through the process of this development they have an effective means of communicating with Developers. And maybe that person will find the freedom and compensation in doing that work more satisfying then their current activities.

The first thing a User or Developer should do is to process the information necessary to join this community. When enough people have joined then the community should begin the process of nominating people to the Executive Committee and each modules Expert Group. Establish the roles and responsibilities of these groups and establish a time frame in which each will sit. Once these nominations are set, the voting for each position can begin.

This process isn’t written in stone, it is only my idea of how the development “might” work. If the User community wants a different process then they should adopt it. This is your system. My vision of how this “could” operate is what I have written in the innovation blog and draft specifications. My role now and in the future is to support the community with what it needs to get the job done and be successful. This primarily focuses on sourcing the financial resources from the producers to pay the Users and Developers.

What I foresee some Users and Developers doing in this community is making the system a cornerstone of their own business operation. Where they may have, or will develop, a firm that integrates the land and accounting information of a producer into these systems modules. Or you may have a business that you conduct an element of the production accounting for a variety of JOC’s. Or possibly a business that provides technical support for a number of producers and / or JOC’s. Some will be one-person operations, and others will have a large staff base. The common denominator of all these businesses is the producers’ needs and the software systems that are being built here by its Users.

A further clarification of where the beginning and end of these businesses start and stop is that I only have an interest in the software. The software is supported indirectly through these businesses, and it is the business of those independent businesses that makes it stand on its own. The final clarification is that I pay for the User and Developer involvement of defining and building the software, and therefore may be considered by some of these businesses to be a paying customer.

But what about the producer, how do they fit into and benefit from this eco-system? Simply they pay to have their systems development done on a cost basis amortized over the entire industry. Unlike SAP and Oracle that repeatedly charge for the software to each company, each company in this system is only paying for their proportionate share of the software development and infrastructure costs. A proportionate share that is being determined as a function of $x.xx per barrel of oil equivalent per year. Whereas if the cost per boe per year is determined to be $1.00 in the first year of development. Then a company such as Encana, which produces 700,000 bbls per day, would pay $700,000 for one year’s access to the system. Each year would be a different value based on the software development needs of the community.

The point of this is that the total cost of the community is shared over the entire producer base. For Encana to pay $700,000 for these services would be a single digit fraction of what they are paying now. Lets hope they begin to see the value of this methodology and start their participation, which is desperately needed, and provide the funding for this community.

The methodology being proposed here, where the producers pay the annual cost of software development mitigates the two impediments to innovation. The two impediments are code and customers. As a software company gets more of each, it begins to take on a Herculean task to re-write and update the code. The software vendor then becomes sensitive to the desires of the community and begins to reject changes on the basis that the costs are not supported in their revenue model.

The producers knowing the software developers potential market is small further aggravate this situation. By limiting the financial resources the producer starves the software developer of the financial resources they need to grow and prosper. A desperate software developer must eat and will do things that are against its best business interest and capitulate to the marketplace.

The reality of the situation in Calgary is, I think, further aggravated by the lack of investment capital for software development. Who after all wants to invest in the scenario that I mentioned above? And secondly, banking for intellectual property just doesn’t exist.

These situations are real and manifest themselves in the fact the software stagnates for 30 years with a 70% market share.

When the financial rewards of exploration and production are as prosperous as the $100 price of oil. Then I think we need to start doing things differently. What I am proposing eliminates these problems and provides a competent software development capability that serves its community. Join me here.

Technorati Tags: People's, Open-Source, Organization, Proposal,

Google Sites announced.

A few weeks ago I promised an update on the activities of this project. The most recent news is the announcement of the new application “Google Sites” for Google Apps. I have been waiting for two key technologies from Google, Google Sites and the elusive G: Drive. Seems we will have to wait a little longer for the G: Drive. The reason I have wanted these technologies is to provide the complete environment I think our Users need. With 25GB of email storage for each User and Developer, and now a 10GB Sites database we have everything we need to start expanding on the eleven-module technical specifications and prepare to start developing these applications. Google Sites has a clean interface that provides the complex tools that our users will need.

What Sites will provide is a forum for the Users and Developers to collaborate on the “what” and “how” of what they need from this application. It will be the Users & Developers who will move the thinking forward, and steer the direction of this project on a day-to-day basis. People wanting to join this project should do the following:

• Review the archives of the innovation in oil and gas blog.
• Gain an understanding of how the system will be different and the impact of using the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct. Focus on the various research areas that have been reviewed to date. How the boundaries of the firm lend themselves to the clear definition of the JOC being the market, and the role the firm takes in this new definition.
• Review and sign the license governing your contributions to the project. (Email me for a copy of the license.)
• Post a summary of your experience and what you can, and would like to, contribute to the project. These will be put in a Sites database where like-minded Users and Developers will be able to search and discover one another. (Up to 2,500 words.)

It will be at this point you will receive access to the community and collaborative environment. Issuance of your first.lastname@people-ideas-objects.com email and Sites account will give you access to all these tools.

The Draft Petroleum Lease Marketplace Module Specification is nearly done. A few more weeks and I should be able to post it. It is becoming clear to me that the Draft Partnership Accounting Module and Draft Accounting Voucher will be the third and fourth specifications to be published. It is very important to remember that these specifications are draft and only represent the “what” and “how” the overall vision of this application and its module operate. These are guideposts for the Users and Developers to work with to expand them where necessary and make them work for them in doing their jobs.

Recall the overall objective is to ensure that this application provides the energy producer with the most efficient basis in which to operate its oil and gas assets. And that will include the Users who are involved in this project reselling their time and energy to the producers that use the application.

The energy industry is very much a global business. Rarely do you have a producer that has contained all of its operations in one reporting jurisdiction. The Joint Operating Committee is the global - financial, legal, operational decision-making and cultural means of the industry. Recognizing the JOC as the key organizational construct denotes that the People, Ideas & Objects application and modules will have a global scope of operations. Limiting the geographical scope of the application makes little sense.

Financial resources from the producers continue to disappoint. However we cannot wait for the inevitable day that they realize they need to be involved in this development project. I will continue to solicit producers for financial assistance and participation. Recall most of the money will be used to compensate the Users and Developers for their time during development.
I have added three new module specifications to the application. The three modules are:

• Accounting Voucher Module
• Analytics & Statistics Module
• Performance Evaluation Module

The Accounting Voucher Module is simply recognition that the Accounting Voucher as conceived in this system is a module onto itself.

The Analytics & Statistics Module provides an interface to the application that enables the User to set criteria and establish ad-hoc reporting of items they are interested in. It will enable the deep analytical view of the data and information that they have access to. It's perspective will be from the firm where management can analyze one or many JOC's they participate in.

The Performance Evaluation Module provides the JOC a tool that will enable the participating producers with a means to evaluate the property for a variety of generic criteria. Key to the tools use will be the ability to create differing scenario's and the impact they would have on the property.

Technorati Tags: People's, Modularity, Development, Wiki,

"Democratizing Innovation"

Professor Eric Von Hippel of MIT

There are two free books that help provide an understanding of how People, Ideas & Objects software development project will proceed. And most importantly the role of the Users and Developers involved. The first book is the above titled and can be downloaded from here. The second book "The Future of Ideas" is also down-loadable, and written by Professor Lawrence Lessig of Stanford University.

Professor von Hippel's book documents the means to attain the innovation that we seek. In Chapter 1 he provides a summary of the entire book. This summary provides coverage of the points that I want to make, so lets begin.

Chapter 1

Professor von Hippel starts off with framing the context in which he sees innovation occurring. Defining both User centred innovation vs manufacturer centric innovation. For the purposes of this blog entry, von Hippel's focus on the use of "manufacturers" is consistent with our understanding of oil and gas user based innovation.

Users that innovate can develop exactly what they want, rather than relying on manufacturers to act as their (often very imperfect) agents. Moreover, individual users do not have to develop everything they need on their own: they can benefit from innovations developed and freely shared by others. p. 1

This software development project is global in scope, use of the Joint Operating Committee is the cultural norm throughout the industry. The People, Ideas & Objects project is conceived in the open source model and will provide the Users, developers, and producers with innovations developed elsewhere. I believe this is possible and Professor von Hippel indicates how this is happening.

At the same time, the ongoing shift of product-development activities from manufacturers to users is painful and difficult for many manufacturers. Open, distributed innovation is "attacking" a major structure of the social division of labor. Many firms and industries must make fundamental changes to long-held business models in order to adapt. p. 2

This very point was addressed in my original thesis. Anthony Giddens is currently more famous as an adviser to British Prime Minister Tony Blair, however, in 1984 he published "The Constitution of Society" which introduces his structuration theory. Structuration suggests that people, organizations and society progress at the same rate, any imbalance in one would lead to failure in the others. I had suggested that the energy industries use of the hierarchical organizational model had exceeded its useful life, and indeed was inhibiting both people and society. I think that we are beginning to see and understand the failures that the energy bureaucracies are having on society. Moving to the industry standard Joint Operating Committee is the fundamental change that is necessary to avoid these failures. How these changes are implemented is through a clean break from the old business model.

Innovation user and innovation manufacturer are the two general "functional" relationships between innovator and innovation. p. 3

We need these two types of innovations. One is the systems, developed by its users, that support the innovative energy industry, and in turn support the innovations that need to take place in the earth sciences and engineering disciplines. Professor Giovanni Dosi shows that science is influenced by innovations which in turn leads to new sciences and new innovations. Consumers and producers of innovations may be more a reflection about a point in time rather then an individuals role in the long term. Software systems need to adapt to changes like these. This is what I am setting out to provide to this user community.

In figure 1.1, the increased concentration of innovations towards the right indicates that the likelihood of innovating is higher for users having higher lead user index values. The rise in average innovation attractiveness as one moves from left to right indicates that innovations developed by lead users tend to be more commercially attractive. (Innovation attractiveness is the sum of the novelty of the innovation and the expected future generality of market demand.) p. 4

Who these innovation leaders are is unknown at this time. But as this project continues to achieve mind-share in the energy sector, I think we will begin to soon find out.

Mass manufacturers tend to follow a strategy of developing products that are designed to meet the needs of a large market segment well enough to induce purchase from and capture significant profits from a large number of customer. When users' needs are heterogeneous, this strategy of "a few sizes fit all" will leave many users somewhat dissatisfied with the commercial products on offer and probably will leave some users seriously dissatisfied. p. 5

A drive that I am attempting to lead away from the generic industry software solutions of IBM, SAP and Oracle. The energy industry is too unique to share any similarities to other industries.

The social efficiency of a system in which individual innovations are developed by individual users is increased if users somehow diffuse what they have developed to others. p. 9

Encapsulating the value of today's collaborative Information Technologies.

When we say that an innovator freely reveals information about a product or service it has developed, we mean that all intellectual property rights to that information are voluntarily given up by the innovator, and all interested parties are given access to it - the information becomes a public good. p. 9

This is how the second book "The Future of Ideas" written by Professor Lessig's comes into play. If everyone is only concerned about the access rights to their own ideas this entire community will be eventually reduced to a place where only Lawyers will be happy. The licensing model for this project simply enables the free and unencumbered access to the ideas and intellectual property contained within this project. This is derived through myself granting Users and Developers free access to all of the intellectual property. In turn each User and Developer assigns the rights in their ideas and innovations back to the copyright holder enabling immediate re-distribution of the idea. This is necessary to maintain the free access for all concerned, and, that I have a strong position to assess the energy producers for the appropriate financial resources necessary to pay the Developers and Users to do this work.

Innovation by users tends to be widely distributed rather than concentrated among just a very few very innovative users. As a result, it is important for user-innovators to find ways to combine and leverage their efforts. Users achieve this by engaging in many forms of cooperation. Direct, informal user to user cooperation (assisting others to innovate, answering questions, and so on) is common. Organized cooperation is also common, with users joining together in networks and communities that provide useful structure and tools for their interactions and for the distribution of innovations. Innovation communities can increase the speed and effectiveness with which users and also manufacturers can develop and test and diffuse their innovation. They also can greatly increase the ease with which innovators can build larger systems from inter-linkable modules created by community participants. pp. 10 - 11

I think that this is by far the best method in which this community should be built and achieve what is possible in this time and place. I would challenge anyone to suggest a more effective means of this communities innovations, and avoid the following.

Intellectual property law was intended to increase the amount of innovation investment. Instead, it now appears that there are economies of scope in both patenting and copyright that allow firms to use these forms of intellectual property law in ways that are directly opposed to the intent of policy makers and to the public welfare. p. 12

This discussion is the method that Open Source projects have used in the technology environment. Not all open source projects fall within this category, only what I perceive as the commercially successful ones.

User's ability to innovate is improving radically and rapidly as a result of the steadily improving quality of computer software and hardware, improved access to easy to use tools and components for innovation, and access to a steadily richer innovation commons. Today, user firms and even individual hobbyists have access to sophisticated programming tools for software and sophisticated CAD design tools for hardware and electronic. These information based tools can be run on a personal computer, and they are rapidly coming down in price. As a consequence, innovation by users will continue to grow even if the degree of heterogeneity of need and willingness to invest in obtaining a precisely right product remains constant. p.13

and

I conclude this introductory chapter by reemphasizing that user innovation, free revealing and user innovation communities will flourish under many but not all conditions. What we know about manufacturer - centered innovation is still valid; however, lead user centered innovation patterns are increasingly important, and they present major new opportunities and challenges for us all. p. 17

Thank you Professor von Hippel for noting these key points and the free access to these important concepts in your book. If we miss this opportunity it will not be as a result of a lack of access to the intellectual property.

Professor Lessig has a unique understanding of some of the legal implications of the Internet. I recommend reading his book as a companion to Professor von Hippel's book. Lessig's book provides an understanding of many of the issues and opportunities around intellectual property. I think that the most effective way in which these ideas can be populated and built upon are addressed in Professor Lessig's book, and implemented in People, Ideas & Objects.

Technorati Tags: People's, Copyright, Open-Source, MIT,

Why Sun Microsystems is our vendor.

This may be possibly one of the most important technology announcements ever made. (Click on the title of this entry for the article.) If it's not the biggest, I can assure you that it is the largest that I've seen and probably ever will. This announcement tells the current bunch running IT the party is over. Pack your bags your out the guard is changing.

Information Week reports Sun's CEO Jonathon Schwartz states Sun's vision and strategy are now focused on providing support to the start up software firm. In doing so Schwartz expressly calls his current key partner Oracle, the competition.

Schwartz said Sun is repositioning itself as a disruptive software supplier, using freely downloadable open source code to initiate relationships with developers in young Internet companies. With MySQL in its arsenal, Sun has become "an arms dealer" for the next generation of those companies, said Rich Green, the vendor's executive VP for software.

But Sun may find itself offending some communities even as it builds new ones. Oracle is an old partner that has sponsored Solaris sales to customers that want to run the Oracle database. By offering free or low-cost MySQL subscriptions, Sun is now a threat to Oracle's database cash cow. "MySQL will work fine alongside Oracle," Schwartz said in response to an InformationWeek question, "but I prefer to focus on acquiring new customers, not on the competition."

This hurts Oracle. Oracle could see the Open Source writing on the wall and launched a massive takeover of established software vendors. Sun has driven database sales for Oracle for many years. Oracle is now forced to hang its hat on the old generation technologies as the key to their sales growth.

I have documented the two constraints of a software vendor in this blog before. The constraints of code and customers motivate the "established" software vendor to sell the status quo. Change becomes unspeakable in terms of innovation or progress. Old generation software companies had to die in order for change to occur. This has been reflected in IBM's jettison of Qbyte a few years ago. So how does a software vendor compete in this new generation?

As you can imagine the business model has to change, or should I say has changed. Open Source software shows the way. The code base is never settled. It is in a constant state of development. Go to any open source project and you can select any version of the software that you like. The bleeding edge, the alpha, the beta and a few versions of the supported code base in "stable" condition. Innovation doesn't stop, how could the code? The customers demand that the software be reliable and operate as promised in their firm. Any variation needs to be addressed with very specific processes. And no two companies are ever the same. This is where the constant development model meets the reality of the installation and the software User becomes the key in the Open Source community.

To many people in the oil and gas industry, dealing with a start-up on such a large-scale project is not something they thought they would have to do. But how else can you approach such a difficult task as is faced by the energy industry as a whole. Can you continue to live with software that was conceived in Germany for manufacturers? If you believe you can then you know who to call.

Sun's Schwartz has legitimized People, Ideas & Objects as the key to the future generation of IT enabled oil and gas producers. And completely de-legitimized the non Open Source vendor. And in the process has told the Emperor he has no clothes. In my books that is a big announcement.

Technorati Tags: People's, Sun, Open-Source, Software,

Yesterday's thinking.

Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) are having their annual conference in Texas this week. The CERA / IHS line that a tidal wave of petroleum is about to hit the consumer continues without much basis in fact or reality. Its been too many years of this monotonic claim of theirs to consider the message as valid.

Irrespective of CERA's message, there are those that suggest more spending is needed. I think more spending has been tried by Chevron and others, and also proven invalid. Doing more and more is rarely the right choice. Change is certainly in the air, it is important to note this point in time is an opportunity for new thinking and actions to take place.

As Einstein stated, today's problems are not solved by today's thinking. I think it is reasonable to assume that the earth sciences and engineering disciplines have increased in complexity. As the bar is raised substantially for successful oil and gas exploration and production. Eventually the structured hierarchy, which is inefficiently efficient, will prove to be inadequate to meet the needs of the science and the industry. What is needed is new forms of organization where the science can develop within the organizations, and be used effectively to produce more oil and gas. This challenge has been the key issue that has driven the writings in this blog. The research to determine if the Joint Operating Committee can fulfill this role is proven, at least academically.

The management, and most importantly the system's like SAP and Oracle, have been developed in the old "banking" type thinking of the energy industry. Invest a dollar today, and you'll receive a 10% return on almost a guaranteed basis. This thinking is a product of the excessively low oil and gas prices of the 1980's and 1990's. The business today is more science oriented then the banking orientation can comprehend. The systems that were developed in the past are designed to accommodate the governance and compliance of the SEC, Tax and Royalty regimes. Neither SAP or Oracle recognize the existence of the Joint Operating Committee. Yet the JOC is the legal, financial, organizational decision making and cultural way of the business on a global basis. If we moved the compliance and governance of the bureaucracy to the the four frameworks of the JOC this science and innovation mindset of the industry will be accommodated.

But there are more benefits to be had. With the systems that are available in today's marketplace. And the current population of oil and gas workers. We can organize in ways that have been proven time and again to increase productivity. Adam Smith's Division of Labor is based on his re-organization of a pin making shop. Smith's reorganization of the pin factory rendered 240 times the volume of pin production. Division of labor is also known as the primary method of how economies grow. Further division of labor holds the greatest opportunity for the industry to deal with the age and retirement of the workforce.

The times that we now live in are too complex to move to a new organization without the proper preparations being made. Key to those preparations are the software developments that are built to accommodate these changes. Change must first be implemented in the software, or any unprepared change will be relegated to manual systems. I am in the process of publishing the eleven draft module specifications of the People, Ideas & Objects application. This application is under development here to incorporate these ideas and opportunities.

Ludwig von Mises noted the industrial revolution was the solution to the problem of over-population. We are faced with these same problems today, and I would suggest the Information Technology Revolution will only begin when it is deemed to be the solution to the problem of over-population. For oil and gas, please join me here.

Technorati Tags: People's, Development, People, Science,

New Module's in People, Ideas & Objects Specification

I have been working on the draft specification of the Petroleum Lease Marketplace Module, which may be finished in as little as one month. A number of ideas were generated by the specification process, and two new modules have been added to the specification. Also, by designating the Accounting Voucher as a module in itself, the specification now includes eleven unique modules.

Recall that all these modules recognize the Joint Operating Committee (JOC) as the cornerstone of the business of oil and gas. These modules adopt the culture that exists today in oil and gas. And reflect what is in the legal, financial, cultural and operational decision making frameworks. These eleven module specifications embrace and extend these four frameworks of the Joint Operating Committee.

The original eight modules were specified and detailed in these blog entries here.

The two new modules that have not been mentioned before are named appropriately "Analytics & Statistics Module" and "Performance Evaluation Module". Just as many may think "what's the difference?" I would answer that the two modules reside in the differing domains of the Firm and JOC. Just as the Research & Capabilities Module and Knowledge & Learning Module are designated to the Firm and JOC. Since my next blog entry will be "A quick summary of where we are at" I will only introduce these three new modules here and follow up with the next posting.

Technorati Tags: People's, Modularity, Software, Development

Chevron's Reserves

CNN reports that Chevron Texaco's 2007 reserve replacement ratio was only 15% of production. This in spite of $12.2 billion in capital expenditures. Profits of $18.7 billion were attributed to higher prices.

I published my thesis in May 2004. It was based on the hypothesis that "The corporate hierarchical organizational structure is an impediment to progress and most particularly, innovation." and to "Determine if the Industry Standard Joint Operating Committee, modified with today’s information technologies, provides an oil and gas concern with the opportunity for advanced innovative-ness.” Based on the Chevron, BP, Shell and Exxon 2007 annual reports, I believe this hypothesis has now been proven correct. And the industry business model is fundamentally flawed and terminal.

For the past two years I have been writing about these theories and asking "what if" the industry did move toward using the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct? And "how" would these changes affect the industry. From this analysis I have been able to publish the modular breakdown of the People's, Ideas & Objects application, and what is necessary to make this application function for the oil and gas industry.

Amongst the most important needs is the financial resources of the industry to support the users and developers of this application. If now is not the time, when? I would like to think that the work that I did over the past 4 years provides some value for the industry. Particularly from the point of view of giving them a head start on solving their reserve replacement ratios.

Technorati Tags: People's, Call-to-Action, Firm, Failure

I'm not getting this...

BP reports a decline in earnings, and the result is a 5% reduction of their workforce? We saw Shell announce smaller layoffs, but is this how the remnants of the seven sisters will deal with the current energy problems? What will happen next year?

Technorati Tags: People's, Failure, Peak-Oil