Annual Report Season is Here!

This is the time of the year in which we can clearly identify who the bureaucrats are. They are the ones that are hiding under their desks while their phone rings constantly. This is the one time of the year that they need to stand up and be accountable for the mess they've caused. Questions about those skeletons that have been neatly packed and highly compressed in the closet can only lead to misery as far as they're concerned. If anyone of those skeletons is discovered the whole closet could explode due to the high numbers of them so tightly compressed. If only they could take their vacation now and come back after everything dies down.

We should expect to see some awful performances from the producers this season. Having both oil and gas prices so low was never a scenario that was considered. Shale based reserves have truly changed the dynamic in the industry. It is now an abundant industry with very high costs. I read in World Oil last week that the Saudi’s Opec representative commented on the following.

The world needs $40 trillion of oil investments in the next two decades to meet growing demand by emerging nations, al-Madi said. Demand will grow 1 MMbopd every year for the next 15 years to about 111 MMbopd, Nasser Al-Dossary, Saudi Arabia’s OPEC national representative, said at the same conference on Sunday.

We should all be surprised by that $40 trillion number. However it must have some credibility. That’s an average of $2 trillion per year which seems within the ballpark. It is also a global number. What it would be for the North American market is unknown. The point is there is an important question that needs to be asked to the bureaucrats who are under the desk, if only they would answer the phone. What is the vision, plan and idea for earning a profit on those investments? And what kind of return are you providing the industry now? Now you understand fully why they hide.

The answer is this is an industry that operates on gross margin. Bureaucrats don't consider the cost of capital in determining the cost of business. That’s probably not the right thing to say. Its truthful but it sounds stupid. As we have discussed before the past investments of the industry sit on the balance sheets of the producers. Bloating them out of all sense of proportion to their revenue streams. With the amount of depletion that is recognized, the income statements in the past few years have looked OK, but as I said we only work on gross margins, or cash flow as we call it in oil and gas. And with the low cost of our head office being such a small percentage of our revenue you'll see we run a tight ship. Just don't ask about how much of the head office staff that we have capitalized to that already bloated balance sheet.

So here’s the deal the bureaucrats will say, trust us, we’ll make you money…

Doing some simple math in terms of the $40 trillion investment should shock the average bureaucrat in believing there is a capital cost associated with the oil and gas business. A simple allocation of the $40 trillion over the 111 million barrels per day for the 20 year period brings in a whopping $65.82 / barrel in additional capital for each and every barrel. Not bad for a product that sells for $50. However if you look only at the incremental production and allocate those costs over those 15 million barrels. It comes to $487.06 in capital costs per barrel. Maybe I'm beginning to see the light as to why the bureaucrats preclude any capital costs in the calculation of their profits.

And of course People, Ideas & Objects, our Preliminary Specification, the user community and service providers are different. We include the costs of capital and overhead in the determination of profits at the property level. Then if the property is profitable it will be produced. Otherwise it will sit in the shut-in inventory where the engineers and geologists can apply all of their innovative thinking to make the property profitable. This is our plan, our vision, our idea and how we provide an incremental $5.7 trillion in profits in that approximate time period. Real profits after that $40 trillion has been returned to the investors. Not profits that are declared with the $40 trillion in investments still sitting on the balance sheet.

Oil and gas is a failing industry. Bureaucrats will fail to meet the market expectations described here. They will fail to provide a business case for the investments to be made. And they will fail in providing answers to the critical questions that are going to be asked here this month and next in what is commonly referred to as annual report season. And if the bureaucrats can get to mid-May they will have made it through another year where they can continue to incinerate more capital and maybe even think about expanding that boat launch after all.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Who Are We Looking For?

The business opportunity that was defined in yesterday’s post will appeal to those that are of interest to People, Ideas & Objects. Those that are intimate with the details of a process and have the fundamental understanding of how the oil and gas industry operates in terms of its operations, administration and accounting. Those people that can define and support a process that includes the elements of the industry that need to be there, and those that the producers want to be there. People who have been working in the industry for upto a few decades and have risen through the ranks to include themselves in a variety of different roles and areas. These are the people that interest us.

Those that are entrepreneurs within the industry that are able to take the opportunity that we have defined here and run with it to its ultimate expression. This is how the industry will be remade in the vision that is the Preliminary Specification. Where people will act in the best interests of the profitability of their clients, the producer firms. Without profits in the producer firms there is nothing for the individuals or society in the long term. A losing industry such as we have today is a drag on our governments revenue streams and puts the jobs of many in jeopardy of loss, unnecessarily so. We also have a job to do in terms of ensuring that society is provided with the energy necessary to maintain our way of life. That doesn’t seem in jeopardy today. However it will be if the industry continues to lose money over the long term.

All very pious and grandiose claims. The alternative is that we really are here just to shop and keep up with the neighbors latest purchase. I prefer to think that we have better control of ourselves. The point is that this ecosystem will be valuable for the people that participate here in the user community. It is they who will be the ones that fulfill the user community vision. Who will have the power to influence the business models that the industry uses and how best the industry can earn its profits. That collective wisdom will be implemented through the software that is delivered from their efforts.

It is this kind of individual that holds the keys to the future of the industry. That should be clear through today’s post and throughout all of our discussions. And this is how they can transition from the position of where they are today to one in which they can be operating their own service provider in a few years. Where the scope and scale of their operation is a substantial organization that they have built from nothing with their own skills and talents. Something that provides them with a far better standard of living and satisfaction than what they may be enjoying today. And maybe its a partnership with some of the other users that they will meet along the way. Who knows, what is obvious however is that the industry is not performing and has no plans or vision in how it can.

This motivational speech will appeal to the person that we are interested in. It will also alienate the bureaucrats that feel it is inappropriate for the oil and gas industry. Thats because they think the Preliminary Specification is inappropriate for the industry. The bureaucrats have failed miserably. They are completely out of ideas as to how to change the situation in the industry. Prayers are not being answered this year because none were asked in the run up to the winter months. What do you do with an industry that has kept your family fed and housed for the past decades and now is not performing, has no plans or vision, no ideas and most importantly not even a prayer?

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Copyright is the Glue That Hold Everything Together

The other day we noted that the service providers would have the exclusive rights to manage their process. That there would be no competition in terms of other firms providing the same processes management. The manner in which service providers compete is on the basis of specialization and the division of labor. The way that we ensure that no direct competition is generated for the service provider is that each service provider is licensed in terms of its access to the underlying Intellectual Property based on our copyright and of course by way of access to our software to manage the process. The copyright in this case also precludes others from operating within the service providers field of operation. There are many other ways that the copyright is used throughout the People, Ideas & Objects environment that makes up the Preliminary Specification, the user community and service providers. This post will touch on those areas and give a brief overview of the manner in which the copyright is used.

I am the beneficial owner of the copyright that defines the Preliminary Specification and the contents of this blog. These ideas form the Intellectual Property contained within this ecosystem. It is on the basis of the ownership of this IP that I am able to, eventually, raise the revenue from the producer firm to support our budget. Our budget includes the cost of our developers and pays for the time of the user community. Service provider revenues are sourced from the producers directly as the replacement to their current G&A costs. This is the flow of money in this ecosystem. It is important to establish this flow as it also details the flow of the ownership of the Intellectual Property.

The first thing that is necessary is to grant a license from myself to People, Ideas & Objects for them to prepare derivative works of the Preliminary Specification and the ideas contained here in this blog. This will be in the form of software code and will be, through the license, renounced back to me as I will be the one paying for the development of the software. The user community operates in the same manner. Since they are paid for their work, the Intellectual Property that is generated flows back to me and becomes part of the total IP consisting of software code and other input. This is important as each user community participant and developer are granted within the license the right to access and prepare derivative works from this Intellectual Property. What would be unworkable would be the entire community making IP claims to their contributions as their Intellectual Property and then having to cross license each others contributions. The method that we are using in this community allows access for those that are licensed to these developments all of the necessary access and use that they need to do their work.

The user community participant is also a key member of each individual service provider. And therefore they have the rights through a specific license to manage a specific process. This license is an end user license that governs the use of the software. It is in the service providers where the user community participants will earn the majority of their capital appreciation and earnings. The user community participant also earns money for their time and effort with our developers, however building a service provider organization provides them with the opportunity to build real long term value for themselves.

It is the nature of Intellectual Property that the oil and gas industry has ignored for the better part of this century. And as a result they have lost large portions of it to initiatives such as People, Ideas & Objects. It will be the case in this century that you will need Intellectual Property in some form in order to do your work. You will have to own it outright. You will have to have a license in which to access some IP, such as the user community participant and their service provider firms. Or you will have to have access to it through your employer, such as a service provider. One of these methods will be the only way in which you will be able to work in whatever industry you choose to work in. That of course is my opinion. And we already see this happening with the proliferation of end user license agreements, etc.

One of the reasons for the Intellectual Property becoming so prevalent in the future is its ability to hold communities together. In our case it is the glue that enables the user community to do their work. That authorizes their management of the process. And precludes those from working against the interests of those that have contributed to this community and therefore have earned some rights and capabilities that are a part of the communities offering. One of the things that the bureaucrats were notorious for was to take the Intellectual Property and capabilities of a service based firm and freely pass these among their competition and sponsor several “me-to” competitors. That’s not going to happen in this environment. You will be protected as a user community member by the license that is granted to you in the process of joining the user community and contributing. It is important to note not everyone will be granted a license and only user community participants in good standing will be able to establish service providers. Since the service providers are a new sub-industry there will be large numbers of these formed. The population of user community participants in the budget have been specified at 3,000. Recall that we expect that service providers will be taking the load of the G&A of the industry which we estimate to be a large portion of the current $40 to 60 billion in G&A costs of the North American producers. Taking a rough average then, a service provider would generate $10 million per year in revenues.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

The Service Providers Role

With the combination of the Preliminary Specification and the service providers. People can see the difference in the way that business will be conducted in the oil and gas industry. Administration and accounting will be handled by the service providers on a global industry wide basis. No longer will the oil and gas producer be constrained by their administrative and accounting capabilities affecting their growth or profitability. Having the service providers operating in the manner we noted yesterday makes these costs variable in nature. Allowing the producer to shut-in unprofitable production and therefore reduce the royalties, operating costs and overhead on the property and the firm overall. Enabling the producer to select their production profile based on the profitability of their production ensures that they, as a producer, will always be profitable. And their ability to scale up their production is immediate by accessing the administrative and accounting capabilities that support any new production through the industry based capabilities of the service providers.

Getting these concepts into the minds of the future user community participants is critical to the success of People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification. We are not rebuilding the existing systems that are so deficient in providing value to the oil and gas producer. The entire configuration of the industry, where the service providers are separate from the producers. And focused on one individual process of the producers business. Demands a different perspective and point of view of how the industry operates and the systems that are built by the user community.

Our objective in making these changes is to provide the flexibility in the producers deliverability and production profile, and to allow them to focus on their key competitive advantages of their earth science and engineering capabilities, and their land and asset base. The service providers on the other hand are handling the administrative or accounting process that is theirs. They own the process and are solely responsible for the management of it on behalf of the industry. Their process is their competitive advantage. And with that they have the people to manage the process, the capabilities to make changes to both the process and the software itself through their participation in the user community. This is the critical point of failure where the quality of systems usually fail. The producer currently has no one to turn to who has ownership of the issue. The service provider, who contains the user community participant, has the power through the user community vision to enable the changes to be made. They will have the people to deal with the producers issues.

It will be the service providers process that is the source of their competitive advantage. And it will be on the basis of specialization and the division of labor that they are able to compete. Taking the data set of the industry and being responsible for it for that process is a completely different basis in which to look at the industry. It is also the only reasonable approach here in the 21st century. Having each producer develop the administrative and accounting capabilities to support their organization is a constraint and is the primary reason that so many producers are losing money. The scope and scale of the actual overhead of the producer is not that significant, however it is large enough that it requires them to continue producing in the current environment. With all the staff on their payroll they need to keep operating all of their properties to continue paying everyone. The shale revolution is declaring this business model is out of step with the needs of the industry. The bureaucrats won’t listen and continue on despite putting their firms in jeopardy. Change is desperately needed.

What we as individuals need to do is to think of the ways that the service providers will work in this new environment. That is the way that we need to go about building these new processes. First in the software itself with People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification. Remember software identifies and supports the organizational constructs. That will enable the changes to be made in the organizations. Then with the user community participants developing the service providers themselves the changes needed in the industry can be implemented with the software, the process and the people operating in the manner that makes the oil and gas producer the most profitable that they can be.

It will be on the competitive basis that the service provider will use specialization and the division of labor. These will be their key tools in assisting the oil and gas producers. However, people will also need to think what the division of labor between computers and people will be. We need to stop doing the work that is best left to the computers. And begin the far more exciting work of leadership, unstructured problem solving, decisions, creative work, collaboration, research, ideas, design, planning, thinking and making the computers work for us, instead of us working for them.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

What's a Service Provider?

Keeping with the theme of a quick review, I now want to discuss the role of the service providers. And how the user communities involvement makes them important elements of this software development environment and the means in which the producers processes are managed. If we assume for a moment that the population of user community participants is the 3,000 people that we have determined in our budget. We can see that the user is not necessarily employed full time with the development team. This is a reasonable assumption as the time necessary to evaluate, communicate, test and deliver the software from the development team is a collaborative exercise. And within the People, Ideas & Objects community the users are also the principles behind the service providers who provide the administrative and accounting services to the oil and gas producers.

Under the decentralized production model the prototypical producer is reduced to the C class executives, the earth science and engineering resources, some land and legal, and support staff. The remainder of the administrative and accounting resources are reallocated to service providers who focus on one process and have the industry as their client base. This enables them to use the principles of specialization and the division of labor to enhance the service providers offering on a continually improving basis. If a service provider was determining the eligible capital for gas cost allowance, and that would be all that they did, they could apply their focus to the best way in which to approach the industry wide data set that they and all service providers were responsible for. The principle of the service providers, who are also members of the user community, will have the influence in the software development to make the changes to the Preliminary Specification and its derivative works, and enact any desired changes.

With the movement of the administrative and accounting resources from the producers to the service providers. It will also shift the payments for those administrative and accounting costs from the producers staff to the service providers. We believe these payments will make up a large percentage of the North American industries $40 to 60 billion in G&A costs that are incurred today. Therefore the service providers will have these revenues generated as a fee for service rendered during each month there is activity. Therefore if the property is shut-in during a month, due to the producers inability to produce a profit, then the service providers would not have any tasks for that property and no service provider fees would be billed. Otherwise the billing of a service fee to each Joint Operating Committee will be undertaken each month there is production.

These process fees leave the service provider with the financial resources to support the services that are needed by the producers. It also makes up the other portion of the user community participants full year work requirement. Some of their time with the software development team working to build / enhance the software they use at their service provider. And the rest of their time incurred in managing the service provider which they own and operate. It is the user community participant that we will be looking to to establish these service providers. Since none of these service providers currently exist, all of them will need to be developed from this initiative.

Competition between the service providers will be unique. Since they are licensees of People, Ideas & Objects they will have exclusive rights to the domain that they provide their service in. They have no risk that a new service provider will come along and poach their clients for the service that they provide. The manner that they will compete with the other service providers will be in the areas of specialization and the division of labor. Establishing new concepts and methods on which to enhance their offerings and reduce their costs to their clients, the oil and gas producers.

It is in this way that the producer is able to focus on their key competitive advantages of their earth science and engineering capabilities and their land and asset base. By accessing an administrative and accounting capability that is variable, and industry based as opposed to something that has to be developed in-house within each producer firm. The decentralized production model enables the producer to become a price maker in the oil and gas commodity markets and obtain a flexible production footprint based on the profitability of the properties.

The role of the service provider in providing the producer firms with the individual process management is a critical one in the People, Ideas & Objects environment. They will be the ones who are defining and designing the process in its optimal configuration to determine the most efficient method of dealing with the industries needs. They will be the ones, as members of the user community, who will work with the People, Ideas & Objects software development team in determining what those software systems will look like and what is required. And then they will provide the software solution and the people necessary to make the producer firm obtain the most profitable means of oil and gas operations.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Recruitng Our Leadership Team

Another element of our focus on the user community is our recruitment of the 30 or so members of the user communities leadership team. Ideally we are hoping to have the leadership team in place prior to the commencement of software developments in January 2017. This might be possible, however it is not a critical component to our progress. The leadership team will support the user community, most particularly in their early developmental years. We have previously defined the positions within the leadership team. And this post will seek to revisit what those positions are and what is expected of them.

What I feel are the most important positions are the position of Product Owner. If I didn't already have a role in this development I would most definitely be after one of these Product Owner positions. There may be as many as 20 of these positions available in the People, Ideas & Objects development. One for each of the modules of the Preliminary Specification and additional Product Owners for the data models, user interface, etc and for example.

These are senior positions within the development team. They represent the user community within the software developer team and are their representative on the ground in the development. They are well versed in the business topic of the module that they represent and understand the software development process. They are able to troubleshoot any difficulties in terms of the miscommunication between the developers and user community and ensure that the user community understands their deadlines and commitments. Product quality is the effect that the Product Owner can make in terms of their contribution.

We have also established a Board of Directors for the leadership team of the user community. They will assume the typical role of directors in a corporate environment and will therefore provide the strategic vision and leadership of the user community. They will also be responsible for approving the annual budget that is necessary to fulfill that vision and leadership. All of the funding for the user community is sourced through People, Ideas & Objects and therefore these budgets will be prepared and submitted for funding by the leadership team. People, Ideas & Objects as the licensee of the Intellectual Property raises the necessary funds for both the user community and the software developers on an annual basis.

The last positions of the leadership team are the C class executives. A CEO, CFO, COO will need to be secured in order to manage an organization of this size, scope and scale being undertaken. I mentioned before that I will be taking the Chairman's and CEO's role. If we are able to secure people prior to our January 2017 commencement date that would be ideal. We would have no resources to compensate them at that time, however there would be compensation beyond January 2017. More is expected of the leadership team and this is typical of what is required in a startup position.

I can't stress enough the importance that I feel regarding the users involvement in these software developments. We have all seen the types of systems that are developed when the user is excluded from the development. And that will not happen here. We are committed for the next 21 months to be focused on the development of the user community and the leadership team. This will be on top of the work that we have done in the past 15 months. This is the hard work of getting the ideas into the minds of the overall oil and gas industry and creating an interest in developing and participating in a new solution. One based on the Preliminary Specification as our guide to provide the oil and gas producers with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. If you share in this objective and believe that the industry needs to turn away from its bureaucratic, losing ways. Then have a look at what we have here. I'm sure you'll find something that interests you.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Accounting At the Property Level

Last week we noted the determination of profits in oil and gas was subject to different methodologies in terms of how the firms assets were depleted and hence earnings were reported. I suggested that producers had bloated balance sheets as a result of capitalizing all of the activities in the field. And this bloating was enhanced further by the slow process of depletion when using the reserve base as the method of depleting those assets. Overall this having the effect of over reporting profits for the industry. I also suggested that this was systemic, large and unreasonable. Today I want to continue with the accounting theme and look at the individual properties of the producer. And why the producer is unable to determine which properties are not producing a profit.

The main culprit is overhead. The producer has no ability to determine what the overhead of a property is. Many might consider this to be an immaterial amount, however, when you consider what the gross G&A of a producer is, you'll see that the amounts become material to the determination of the properties profitability. The other aspect is the amount is hidden and only recognized as an overhead allowance that is chargeable to the joint account. These allowances are too small to recognize the real costs associated with the overhead of the property. Therefore the property is over reporting their profits. And the majority of the G&A that is reported on the Income Statement is only the net, after capitalization of the majority of the overhead occurs.

If you look at most annual reports you will find a determination of the netback prices showing that the producer is providing positive margins on their operations. And they are. However you can also see that these calculations only include the costs of royalties and production costs. And they are averages. Included in those averages are a few properties that are wiping out all of the profits of the producer. If you include the actual gross overheads and a reasonable depletion based on, lets say the decline curve, you will find that not every property within the producers portfolio will continue to report a profit. This is only reasonable. It is People, Ideas & Objects suggestion through use of the Preliminary Specification that the producer shut-in those properties that are unable to produce a profit, based on an actual accounting of the properties costs.

This can’t be done with the current bureaucratic systems and procedures. They are using accounting policies that were designed in the 1960’s that were involved in the introduction of computers. They are stuck with allowances and estimates, accruals and a whole lotta fudge to make their systems work. To get an accurate accounting of the costs of the property would require them to reorganize the industry around different parameters. Much like what our decentralized production model does.

And the focus that we provide the producer brings two new elements in terms of increasing their profits. One is the focus on specialization and the division of labor. Two economic principles that have been responsible for all of the economic growth that we have realized since the 1790’s. The ability to focus on these principles does not currently exist due to the fact that each producer needs to build the administrative and accounting capabilities within their organizations. And there is no current opportunity for them to share in these capabilities with other producers. When each producer has to be Sarbanes Oxley compliant, each producer has to hire Sarbanes Oxley compliance people. Therefore the administrative and accounting requirements of the producer firm are a constraint and limit to the speed and capacity to grow. With the Preliminary Specifications development of an industry wide administrative and accounting capability, these speed and capacity to grow constraints are removed and the issues do not arise. By having a Sarbanes Oxley compliant service provider specializing in the legislation and providing their services across the industry.

The second element that we provide is for the producer to be a price maker in the oil and gas commodity markets. As we noted above, the ability to shut-in production at the property, when available across the industry will provide the following advantages.

• The producer actually increases their profitability by reducing their production. 
• Under the decentralized production model there will be no overhead incurred by the producer on shut-in production. Overhead becomes a variable cost based on production.
• The commodity prices will rise as there will be less product on the market. 
• And the overall cost to produce will remain lower due to the fact that you won't be adding the losses of the property as additional costs to be earned in the future. 

The fact that Exxon is borrowing money to fund their negative cash flow. And it is expected that $100 billion will be needed to fund the negative cash flow of the shale formations. People, Ideas & Objects rational story about determining profits and acting on the outcomes makes sense to me. The bureaucrats are too conflicted to be involved in our software developments. We eliminate them from the scene. And the investors are cutting and running. Looks to me like an industry that has to experience the phenomenon of creative destruction in order to make the changes to the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Back To Our Priority and Focus

Our planned diversion away from our focus on the user community ended late last week when we realized that the oil and gas investor was too passive to involve themselves in People, Ideas & Objects. They are employing a cut and run strategy away from oil and gas and from the look of most stocks, who can blame them. One of our favorites, in that we mentioned them here late last year is Penn West Petroleum. They had the misfortune of having to restate their financials for a number of quarters based on the fact that they had previously capitalized royalties. Anyway, at the time their stock was as high as $10.19 last year with a market cap of approximately $5.1 billion. Last week the stock touched $1.30 with a market cap of $650 million. Thats a loss of $4.5 billion, or 88%. I have held to a principle in the stock market that if a company loses half of its value in an “event,” then that company can effectively be seen as dead. There is no return for a firm that has taken a hit of that calibre to its stock. The event that has hit Penn West of course is the decline in oil prices and there does not seem to be the resources or capabilities, as far as the market is concerned, for Penn West to survive. I wonder how many other half dead producers there are out there. It is clear to me that we are involved in a disintermediation of the oil and gas business based on the creative destruction of the current infrastructure.

Anyway our priority and our focus is the user community and its involvement in providing the oil and gas producer with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. We need to refocus on this priority as this is our means of being involved in the development of our product the Preliminary Specification. If we had our budget in the bank today, our priority and focus would be on the development of the user community and therefore we are not wasting any time now as a result of being unable to fund our budget. The ability of our message to be broadcast across the industry exists due to the capabilities of the Internet. And the ability of like minded people to communicate and collaborate exists when our budget funding does come into play. For now spreading the word and thinking about how the Preliminary Specification impacts your areas of the oil and gas industry are things that we can and should be doing. This gives us the time to be creative and put some energy, and the necessary quality of time that is needed for a high quality user community based product to be developed. Rebuilding the industry from the ruins that are starting to show, and as noted above, is very exciting from this side of the fence.

Most producers are now starting to make cuts to their staff. Such that staff were the problem that caused the profitability issues the producers are facing. We have been hounding the producers for over a decade about the work that we are doing here. Trust me the failure of the industry is the bureaucrats fault. They have provided less value to their shareholders than if the investors had put their money in the commodity markets. A sad commentary on the performance of the industry over the past ten to fifteen years. Those that are being let go from the producers should find hope that they can be seen as valuable again by joining this community and being part of this revolution. Thats a good word for what we are doing here.

To have the Preliminary Specification operating in the oil and gas industry would provide a lot of value for everyone involved. Those that participate in the user community are the main benefactors and will hold a special seat in the way that the revitalized oil and gas industry operates. Through our user community vision it is the user who has control of the business model that is contained within the software that operates the industry. If there is need for a change in the business model it is the user community that has the power to make those changes. It won’t need to ask anyone for permission or consent. And the user community will have the software development capabilities of People, Ideas & Objects available to implement those changes when they are required. This is a new way of running an industry. One that if you read the current business literature, is becoming somewhat the prototypical organization of the future.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

A Revelation in how our Budget is Funded

A few days ago we asked if we could afford failure. Failure in the oil and gas industry itself. Now I want to ask it in terms of People, Ideas & Objects and the development of the Preliminary Specification. Clearly we are engaged in a battle with the powers that be, the bureaucracy who hold little regard for us. And that makes our task difficult in terms of succeeding when you are in a protracted battle with your customer. However, our appeal, based on our value proposition, has been to address our message to those that are directly affected by the difficulties in the industry, the oil and gas investor. And it is here that we have specifically addressed 386 blog posts. The time has come to evaluate that approach, and ask if its reasonable at this point to assess this as a failure. Clearly the investor, and board of directors who represent them, are too detached from their investment in order to make any fundamental change. It is for them a passive investment. It is therefore fair to assume that our appeals have fallen on deaf ears. Our ability to cobble together a coalition of like minds in this area and fund our budget is a non-starter. And we need an alternative means in order to address our budget needs.

What we have is a value proposition that is in the trillions of dollars. What is needed to achieve this value is the software necessary to identify and support the organization to realize that value. Our budget is the key to establishing that organization. The organization consisting of People, Ideas & Objects, our user community and the service providers. These service providers will have the $40 to 60 billion in overhead that is incurred by the industry today, as the source of their revenue stream for tomorrow. Identified and controlled by the software that they participate in developing. The oil and gas industry generates several trillion per year in terms of its revenues with North America being a large subset of that.

How does disintermediation work? We certainly have identified the needs of the user community and service providers as necessary to make up the changes within the industry. Changes to enable the Preliminary Specification. However is that enough change in order to ensure that society's energy needs are met in the long term? Certainly we have identified the bureaucracy as a redundant form of organization within the People, Ideas & Objects ecosystem. However, is it appropriate to ask if the passive investor model of ownership of the oil and gas industry is also past its usable life? If they too are uninterested in the long term of their investment. And are willingly walking away from those investments. Who are we to argue?

What we therefore need to do is to identify new candidates for interested parties willing to disintermediate the oil and gas industry. In other industries that have been disintermediated the shareholders and directors of the “old” industries did stand by and watched as their investments were fundamentally destroyed. This is the model that fits in every example that I can see. The value of Apple has assumed the value of the industries that they disintermediated. Where are the shareholders in those “old” businesses and industries today?

Which leads us to the logical conclusion that we have for who we can approach to fund the disintermediation of the oil and gas industry. We can not only provide them with the upside in terms of our value proposition. A means in which to operate the industry in the most innovative, dynamic, profitable and successful manner. But also the disintermediation of the existing producers revenue stream which are being willingly given up by the investors and shareholders of the current producers. Who are the natural candidates for this approach? Two off the top of my head are Apple and Oracle.

So here is the revised plan for our development. We are sticking with the January 2017 software development start date. And user community developments are our priority for the period of time up to that point and always. However we will be actively looking to people who are interested in disintermediating the industry as sources for our budget. Passive investment is something that came into play when the merchant organizations became too big to manage by the founder. Disintermediation is a means of exercising the value away from the uninterested passive investors.

What disintermediation has proven time and again is that Information Technology is disrupting current business models. Its only now that I am realizing that one fundamental business model that is being disrupted is the passive investor model. Action is the last thing that comes to the mind of the investor in terms of what to do with their poor performing stock. The first thing they do is sell it. The trick will be not to hold any oil and gas stocks when the pain is realized in the marketplace. Not to involve yourself in fixing things. Therefore our plan will be implemented immediately with a return to our focus on the development of our user community come Monday. Over time we will figure out the funding requirements and ensure that society's energy needs are met in the long term.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

My Oil and Gas Overvalued Hypothesis

The book value of a firms assets are not particularly relevant to the day to day operation of the business. Particularly when the business is a public company with shares traded on an exchange. The market value of those shares will provide the real value of the company based on the markets perception of its value. The book value is what concerns the accountants and is of relatively little concern other than it has significant impact on the firms profitability. And that is determined in the matter of how the assets of the firm are depreciated or depleted in the oil and gas industries case. It is my hypothesis that the oil and gas industry is carrying excessive asset values on their books. These are a result of the SEC’s requirements to follow either successful efforts or full cost accounting requirements in the determination of those assets. This overvaluation of assets. Which I suggest is systemic, large and unreasonable. Leads to material overstatement of profits in the reporting of producers earnings. These are the differences between what I claim the industry, on a wholesale basis, is losing money, vs. the average producer continuing to report earnings in this low commodity price environment.

If producers were to recognize a reasonable depletion of their capital costs. A method that is closer to what a traditional business would use. Their depletion expense for each year would be higher than what is currently reported. By assigning all of the costs involved in the producers capital costs to the asset base of the producer, this inflates the assets on the high side. Traditional businesses who are involved in elements of research are required to expense all research expenses incurred in the current period. Any unsuccessful operations would also be expensed in the current period, however that is not the case in oil and gas. The other aspect of oil and gas capital costs that causes them to bloat the balance sheet and over report earnings is the fact that the capital costs are deducted across the reserves base. In many cases the reserves base is continually expanded from year to year. And the reserve life index of the firm in most cases exceeds a decade. Leaving the situation where most producers are deducting far less than 10% of their assets within a reporting year. This seems inconsistent when the costs to maintain that reserve base and deliverability can and does usually cost upwards of 30% of the asset value of the firm on an annual basis. This would appear to me to determine that the capital costs of the producer should be depleted over a three year term.

Clearly this overvaluation is the SEC’s fault and the accountants at the audit firms accept this thinking as it makes them feel cool and hip in the eyes of the engineers and geologists of the producer firms. Something that they are not generally known for. The problem is that the engineers and geologists are not trained in the accounting requirements and are unaware of the distortions within the balance sheet and income statements that they are producing. They think their activities which are building the firm and its profits are moving the firm in the right direction. Whereas a more conservative evaluation of their asset base would instill a more conservative use of their discretionary cash flow and earnings. If there were any. The net effect of a more conservative depletion methodology would be a more focused industry. In my opinion.

What we have now is the fire alarm ringing and producers running about spending money on the shale based plays that are the place to be. Expanding their productive capacities, building their asset bases and destroying the commodity marketplaces. The continuation of these activities in the face of such losses is not evident to them. Even though they are having to finance their negative cash flows, which on an industry wide basis are projected to be negative $100 billion just for shale. A ludicrous and incoherent manner in which to run an industry.

Clearly the bureaucrats are unable to change. But the incentives and the requirements of being in business are being distorted by a methodology of accounting that doesn’t recognize the real cost of the business. Until a new business model, the Preliminary Specification, and the user community and service providers are able to provide the industry with these kinds of appropriate accountings the industry will be run in this distorted manner. Remember the SEC defines the upper limit of what can be recorded as assets. That doesn't necessarily mean that everything has to be reported as an asset or that the upper limit has to be reached. In an industry that expects to spend the money the oil and gas industry does in the future. Estimates vary and range in the many trillions of dollars over the mid-term. Its important to put those costs in the proper context. Are they assets, or should they be written off in an appropriate time table. One that leads to systemic, large and unreasonable industry wide losses.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Can We Afford Failure?

In most businesses or industries the results of the bureaucracies failures occur with little to no interest from the general public or other concerns. The demise of the record store, Nokia or Blockbuster Video is met with a shrug or a general lack of concern about a way of life that has past. In other industries such as banking, intervention by governments to ensure that the systems that maintain the daily economic requirements of our way of life are maintained is now commonplace. These banking interventions are into their seventh year and there doesn't seem to be any clear direction of a return to normal operations any time soon. Which category does the oil and gas industry fall under. Is it something that we can ignore and idly watch itself destroy its value and capabilities over time. To the point where it can no longer provide for the needs of its customers. Is that the point where wind and solar, tidal and nuclear energy will magically be capable of replacing “dirty” oil and gas? Can we rely on the radical environmentalists to show us the errors of our ways? Or is it something that we should be cautious of and ensure that the capabilities and capacities of the industry are maintained for the need of society? Altruistic questions, but maybe they should be asked.

In mid February I noted the effect of shale based reserves on the oil and gas production markets. These were reflected in the following two graphs. (Sources eia.gov and econbrowser.com)

Note the prolific nature and characteristics of the shale based reserves on deliverability. They have literal hockey stick implications to the continents productive capacity. Here is an updated version of the econbrowser.com graph for the month of February.

Notice any trend from the one that was published in November 2014? This productive capacity increase occurred during a time when the producers announced there would be an approximate one third drop in capital expenditures for the calendar year 2015. Although it might be too early to tell, the announcement itself certainly didn't have an effect on the increases in production. It remained on its upward trajectory. And I think it is reasonable to assume that the actual decline in capital spending will have the same effect. The current motivation for the producer, any producer, to achieve those increases in productive capacity will not cut those shale based capital programs. Why would they? The bureaucrats focus will be on reducing the costs associated with drilling, completion, equipping and operations. Also the overhead in the head office will have to be rationalized further in order to ensure that the producer becomes profitable. If that will ever be possible in this pricing environment.

That is the logic that is the state of affairs in the oil and gas industry. What the bureaucrats are being educated on today is the elasticity of supply and demand of the commodity markets. Their ability to reduce costs to produce a profit will never be achieved because of the effect of continued overproduction in the market. Now this isn't news to anyone is it. However, we see the industry stuck in a business model that it can’t, won’t, will never and does not change. Its demise and eventual destruction of its capabilities would therefore be a follow on process.

Bureaucracies don't change. People do however. And that is why we need to move to a new business model. The Preliminary Specification with its decentralized production model provides a solution to this overproduction by allocating production between producers based on profitability. If the property can be produced profitably based on the current commodity price then it will be produced. Otherwise it remains shut-in. But to do that we have to make some serious changes to the industry and they won’t be made by the bureaucrats. They fight change, like they fight People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification, our user community and the service providers.

Therefore to answer the bigger question of whether we should be concerned about the demise of the oil and gas industry. I suggest that we should. Like banking, oil and gas provides us with everything that makes up our modern lives. Without it we are reduced to prehistoric capabilities. Not a pleasant thought. Should we just wait and leave this up to the bureaucrats to determine the outcome. Or should we act and ensure that the industry continues on in a healthy and prosperous manner for all concerned. I know which side of the fence I’m on.

And just as it was evident that the U.S. housing market was not a place to put your money. The oil and gas industries difficulties are plain for everyone to see. The fact that the U.S. housing crisis stewed for decades probably shows how long we'll have to wait for someone to act in our oil and gas interests. However, we need to remember there is no “Fed” to flood the market with deliverability when things do fall apart.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Why We Need All of our Budget

People, Ideas & Objects has a big job to do which provides significant value to everyone involved in the oil and gas industry. It is as a result of our value proposition that our expectations might seem a bit odd. And as a result they can be taken out of context quite easily. One of these expectations is in regards to our budget and the expectation that it will be fully funded before any work is undertaken. The reason for this is detailed in this post and is as with all things with People, Ideas & Objects, related to our users.

Clearly we have a powerful bureaucracy who are well aware of this project and have chosen not to support it. This can be assumed to continue and that steps will be taken against People, Ideas & Objects and those that willfully participate in either the user community or the future service providers. Protection for these people during the critical period in which they are exposed to the antics of the bureaucracy must be provided. That protection is the assurance that during the transition period that we are building the systems. The revenues they will need to make this software and establish their organizations for the future oil and gas industry. Will be there in the form of the user community fees paid by People, Ideas & Objects during development.

There is significant career risk to those individuals who chose to decide to join the user community and service providers. The bureaucrats will list these people on their “do not hire” list that is shared amongst the bureaucrats at their lair. This will be a permanent change in the users life, there will be no going back to the old ways. However, people who are making the commitment to the industry in the long run. Who are tired of the losing ways of the industry. And chose to join People, Ideas & Objects. Those that are committed to providing the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. Why are they required to take any financial risk in the transition of the industry in order to provide the industry with the $5.7 trillion value proposition?

They aren't being asked to do that and they won't be asked to do that. They will have the financial resources necessary to leave their place of employment in the industry and participate in the user community, and seek to establish a service provider firm for the future of the industry. This will be done on the basis of the work that they do for the user community, the People, Ideas & Objects developers, and will be well compensated for out of the budget of $667 million for user community participation.

If we think that the industry will fund the development of the People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification, user community and service providers on an annual go forward basis. This would be a foolish approach to take with the likes of the bureaucracy lurking in the shadows waiting to poach responsibility for that annual payment. They would most certainly come up with some reason to terminate the funding, or cut the funding, or tie the funding up in some way. I could go on but I’m sure that it is understood that they would try to do something. It is therefore incumbent upon us to ensure that our users and service providers are protected, and the overall viability of this project meets its successful conclusion. Having all of the funds at the beginning of this process is what is required to deal with the personal risks of the user community participants and the inability of putting this project back to together again if there were a temporary disruption. We must begin, continue without disruption and successfully build without the disruptive influence of the bureaucracy. They have shown themselves to be untrustworthy and unreliable. And that is how this unreasonable and odd expectation of having our budget fully funded has been developed.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Oil and Gas Operations in the 21st Century

Last week we highlighted the ways in which People, Ideas & Objects would enable a successful oil and gas industry. One that was dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful. This is detailed in the Preliminary Specification and is what is required for the industry to move forward in the 21st century. Currently the bureaucracy provide no future other than the financial demise of the industry. Theirs is a form of operation that is consistent with how things were done in 1960 or 1935. The need for change is evident based on the earnings of the producers and the changes they have implemented to deal with their financial losses. And that is, they have done absolutely nothing. Sure they have cut their capital budgets, but as we are all learning that does little if nothing to deal with the issues at hand. It is 2015 and we offer a means in which to operate the industry up to 2040. That only seems to me to be a reasonable approach to the way we should be operating the industry.

Change of this scope, led by Information Technology, is occurring in every industry. In every industry the entrenched status quo is fighting to maintain their archaic ways of business. This is the situation in oil and gas. It won’t be the oil and gas producer, led by the bureaucracy, that stands up and says we need to adopt People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification. They have fought long and hard to ensure that we don't see the light of day. What is needed is for those that will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the changes that are made when the system is implemented. And that is the oil and gas investor who are being abused by the bureaucracy as badly as we are. It might be wise to have the investor direct the producers to fund People, Ideas & Objects from their savings in the reductions of their capital budgets.

If we continue on in the manner that we have in the oil and gas business things are only going to get worse. And does it surprise anyone that there is no response from the bureaucrats? This summer its reasonable to assume that storage facilities for natural gas will reach capacity. What this will do to prices for the years to come is certain to be bad news. Recently I read that Canadian producers who were unhappy with the prices for their oil production were shifting to drilling natural gas targets. Bureaucracies are incapable of doing anything but meeting the prime directive. And that is, increase productive capacity and produce. After more than five years in the natural gas business their behavior should have changed. Clearly it hasn't, and it never will. Nor will it change on the oil production side of the business. Surely investors can see that the trend is there. In many ways the oil and gas industry is not a business. Its an engineering exercise.

Who can instill the business discipline that is necessary in the oil and gas business? Only those that are affected by it. There can be a strike by the investors and they can refuse to invest in the industry. This has essentially been happening since 2008, and still these problems exist. The bureaucrats found willing junk bond markets to fuel their needs. And now that that avenue is closed. The reduction in capital expenditures will enable them to continue on without less difficulty. However, you will see continued overproduction, and increases in production in both oil and gas in North America for at least ten more years. The only thing that will stop them is the end of the shale based reserves. Which in natural gas is 50 years. In oil its as little as 10. And that is the Saudi’s game plan. Let the shale based producers, their investors and junk bond holders suffer with losses and financial destruction for the 10 years that shale based oil exists in North America. And then they will have both market share and pricing power again.

Or maybe someone will come up with an idea that makes this nightmare go away. Provide the producers with commodity price making strategies like People, Ideas & Objects does. And we can skip the financial destruction that in my opinion is only really beginning.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Will Be Off This Week

Returning Monday March 16, 2015.

How We'll Be Successful Part IV

People, Ideas & Objects capital structure also provides for its success. There is a long history of venture capital groups involvement in oil and gas ERP systems. And its not a beneficial one from the point of view of the venture capitalists. The number of oil and gas companies makes for a very small market. What the venture capitalists have learned is to avoid small markets as there is no way in which to leverage an investment without large volumes of sales. And that is the example that has been proven time and again in the oil and gas ERP software marketplace. The market is too small and the producers are able to “negotiate” with the ERP vendor to the point where the ERP vendor is selling their products well below cost. They are subsequently told to make it up on the next sale. Only to find the same movie playing.

We have skipped the venture capital chapters of the People, Ideas & Objects history book. I control 100% of the firm. We are structured much like a utility where the revenue stream that we earn from the producers has an element of profit included in the price. This way there is no confusion or conflict as to who’s money is who’s. The user community and software developers will be provided with the resources that they need for the budgeted year. Our costs to the producers will then be adjusted for the profits of the firm and the Intellectual Property royalties that are due.

It is in this way that I will be able to monetize the investment that I have made in People, Ideas & Objects and ensure that the priority of the user community remains the focus. If, in the traditional manner of monetizing an investment, I would have to sell the shares in order to achieve that. With the shares in other hands the decisions as to how People, Ideas & Objects capital structure and revenue flow could change. And the conflict between the shareholders and the user community, as a priority, may come into play. The oil and gas industry needs the user community to be the priority and that will be the case with the capital structure as is defined here.

These are academic ramblings that imply there is value in People, Ideas & Objects down the road. To define these points are important to determine what our priorities are when we are operational. And how we will in turn ensure that the user community, the service providers and the oil and gas producers are able to successfully build off of this initiative. We have spent the past year emphasizing the importance of, and focusing on the user community. This is the only manner in which the oil and gas producers are going to be able to deal with the issues and opportunities that are presented to them in the next 25 years. How we structure ourselves is an important element of how that is achieved and the success of all concerned.

It is also academic to state that I had the option of accepting venture capital funds. Nothing could be further from the truth. In my years of working on this project many have been approached, oddly enough just as many have said no. The scope and scale of what I was doing was beyond what they thought could be approached in a commercial environment. A diplomatic way of saying you're crazy. A classification, as you know, that I have come to appreciate. If I did take any of the money from the venture capital groups it would not have brought us any further towards our goal of building the Preliminary Specification. The need for the oil and gas investors to step up and direct their oil and gas producers to fund this project are clear. No one is going to do the job for them other than themselves. The bureaucrats are too conflicted. There is no money in it for anyone to invest in. And they have the benefit of the value proposition flowing from the producers bottom line onto their pocket book. Its really that simple. Besides what are you going to invest in today, another gas well?

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

How We'll Be Successful Part III

One of the reasons that we will be successful is that we will enable the oil and gas industry to balance the short and long term perspectives of their business needs. This assumes that we are provided with a stable and consistent revenue stream in order to support the work that needs to be done. A criticism of the industry today, and it would apply to all industries, is that it is too focused on the short term and needs to balance this against its longer term needs. Selling today’s production for whatever it is worth would certainly fall into this category. With People, Ideas & Objects providing the dynamic, innovative, successful and profitable oil and gas producer with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. We have provided the optimal short term perspective in which to operate. The need therefore is to continue to address the issues and opportunities of the business in order to ensure that when things change, the producers business model and mode of operation will change as well. With software taking such a key role in defining and supporting our organizations. This is a permanent software development capability that the oil and gas industry must support and financially commit too.

With our budgeted resource implementations of thousands of man years that are needed for the development of this software, and thousands of man years within the user community. This capability will have one source of funding in order to ensure it continues to provide this capability to the oil and gas industry. Through the licensing, that source of funding is from People, Ideas & Objects and that means our revenue stream has to be supplied consistently from the oil and gas producers. This software development infrastructure provides the means of which the industry will operate profitably. Currently the bureaucrats are determining its future by not funding it. We can not be subject to this type of thinking now, or in the future. Our value proposition is only valid if we are operating successfully in the marketplace. Any disruptions to our revenue stream will affect the realization of that value proposition by the oil and gas producers. But will also create permanent damage to the capabilities of the software development team, user community and elsewhere. A shortage of funds requires the stoppage of work. I am not of the opinion that this type of software development capability can have an on/off switch for the industry to use.

The type of destruction that would be caused would be the laying off of people who are working on long term projects that require a constant, determined and consistent application of their time. Those that are focused on the long term that are required to “wander through the woods” in order to determine the next decentralized production model or other innovation. Innovations that are necessary so that the oil and gas producers maintain their most profitable means of oil and gas operations. Alternatively we could implement extreme measures, as if there was a funding cut, prioritizing which expenses were cut first. And it would be in that instance that we could address higher priority areas such as the costs of the cloud computing infrastructure. The point is not to threaten, it is to emphasize the need for an approach to the development of this capability that is inconsistent with the current bureaucrats method of doing business.

This is not only counter to the methodology of the bureaucrats today. It is raising the point of how important software is in society. Since the meltdown of the Tech industry in 2000. People have generally disregarded Information Technologies importance overall. And that reflects the manner in which change is reflected in society. Change is always overestimated in the short term, and underestimated in the long term. We are now clearly in the long term orientation of the changes brought about by Information Technology. The need for industry to develop the requisite software development capabilities is a key part of People, Ideas & Objects value proposition. This capability needs to be funded and provided for in a secure manner so that the development of this capability meets its full potential. And what that full potential is probably can’t be measured in a traditional software development firm. It needs a new commitment from the sponsoring industry in order to ensure that it meets that potential successfully

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.

How We'll Be Successful Part II

That blind spot of the bureaucrats should be coming into focus for those that are concerned about the health of the oil and gas industry. The blind spot being that the industry is failing and that a serious problem exists in terms of its profitability. Discussion in the industry is about the future, which is good, however it looks to the possibilities of what could be. How there will be a trillion dollars spent in infrastructure alone to expand the marketplace for oil and gas. That the U.S. can lead the world in terms of production of both oil and gas. No one stops to ask on whose dime though. Money grows on trees as there are no earnings in the producers to support these investments. So how will these investments be made? And what will be done about those losses that are systematic, critical and terminal? Its that bureaucratic blind spot regarding the state of profitability that is so disconcerting.

This disjointed behavior of the bureaucrats is the traditional “muddling along” operating procedure of the industry. There is no capacity to deal with the issues of the industry. And no desire to change that characteristic. That would require effort and work. The key to the oil and gas industry is to build production capacity and to produce. Let everything else take care of itself. In the past this was all that was possible in terms of operational capabilities in the industry. Things haven't changed as far as the bureaucrats are concerned. In the past there was no Information Technology capability that could do the things that we are proposing with the Preliminary Specification. However things are different today and the seriousness of the problem in the industry requires the industry to make the necessary changes before it collapses.

Recently we pointed out that we would be successful as a result of the user communities vision that we have put in place. That the users were enabled and empowered to make the changes to the software that will operate the industry. This is a necessary first step in order for the industry to lose the “muddle along” strategy and turn it into the dynamic, innovative and profitable industry that it can, should and needs to be. Otherwise we are beholden to the delusions of the bureaucrats who will continue to dream of how they will increase their production for the next decade.

Right now what we need is to organize ourselves to approach the next 25 years. In ways the bureaucrats are right, the future could be quite robust given the endowment of the oil and gas shale reserves. However, there are a lot of equity and debt holders that are looking at the industry with fear that the bureaucrats are so out of touch with the state of the business. If you think natural gas prices are bad today, wait until summer when they'll be far lower as a result of full storage capacity. Not even that will stop the production increases however. As we have indicated, the industry functions on an operating system that has no programmers and no system administrators. There is no one who can make any changes to the way things are being done.

Until the industry solves its profitability problems nothing will happen of significance in this industry. Why? Look at the reserve estimates of the oil and gas shale reserves. This overproduction will never stop until there is a means in which producers have the capability to shut-in unprofitable production. Such as the Preliminary Specification provides. Only then will the industry return to profitability and only then will the industry be able to source the capital and debt that is needed to build out the industry. And its a catch 22 type of problem. There won't be any capital for the producers to invest, yet the overproduction will continue nonetheless.

The point is that the industry has changed. The ways and means that it has to operate has to change as a result. We live in sophisticated times where Information Technology influences our organizations substantially. In order to make any change requires that we build the software to emulate the changes that we desire. Specifically for the reason that it is the software that runs our industries and companies today. However the bureaucrats are unable and unwilling to give up their franchise that is supported by this older software. Getting rid of the old software gets rid of the bureaucrats. That should really be considered a good thing if you think about it. Especially from a profitability and success point of view. And one in which we will be able to move forward with a dynamic, innovative and profitable oil and gas industry.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.