Revisions to Background Pages
Leakage vs. The Right Information
People, Ideas & Objects established the means in which producers build value from their competitive advantages through their land and asset base, and their earth science and engineering capabilities. This was through the profitable expansion of reserves, increases in production or reductions in costs. With the Preliminary Specification a second revenue stream is firmly established from the deployment of their science and engineering capabilities to the various Joint Operating Committees they have an interest in. This revenue stream is designed to, at a minimum, offset the full cost of building and maintaining the competitive advantage the producer has in terms of their earth science and engineering capacities and capabilities.
Providing people with the appropriate knowledge and information for them to act in a fast changing environment is difficult. Speed will be a critical component of the producer's capabilities, deployment and competitive advantage. Currently, some of the difficulty in getting the knowledge and information to the right people is a result of ensuring the integrity of the information was not breached by those that were not part of the organization, or not the information authorized by the organization. The Security & Access Control module of the Preliminary Specification imposes high levels of integrity on all the communications and storage of data and information. However with high levels of collaborations throughout the People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification. There may be the expectation that these collaborations between firms in the Joint Operating Committee is where there may be some perceived leakage of proprietary losses of knowledge. And it is here that People, Ideas & Objects are asking if those losses of information impose any risk to the innovative oil & gas producers competitive advantages of their land and asset base, or earth science and engineering capabilities? No they don’t. In fact, it is the collaborations that enhance the innovativeness and the capabilities of the firm. In a fast moving, innovative industry the last thing a producer is going to want to be constrained by is a method of operation that they own the Intellectual Property of and as a result is the only method of operation the firm pursues. Are the producers and Joint Operating Committees capabilities that are being deployed a fixed point of science or an ability to apply the innovations and sciences developments, and most particularly the developments from the oil & gas marketplace as they occur?
The question therefore becomes how is this proprietary information and capability deployed on an as needed basis? Professor Giovanni Dosi notes that although the free movement of information has occurred in industries for many years, yet has never been easily transferable to other companies within those industries. The ability to replicate a competitive advantage from one company to another is not as easy, and indeed may not be worthwhile doing. Dosi (1988) goes one step further and states, “even with technology license agreements, they do not stand as an all or nothing substitute for in house search.” A firm needs to develop “substantial in-house capacity in order to recognize, evaluate, negotiate and finally adapt the technology potentially available from others.” Therefore why not focus on the need to increase the company's own unique and specific competitive advantages based on advanced specializations and divisions of labor of these sciences.
We are also discussing the operational governance of the firm and Joint Operating Committee. An important element of this discussion is the capabilities that these organizations have access to. Capabilities are documented in the Research & Capabilities and Knowledge & Learning modules of the Preliminary Specification. These are the documentation of the explicit knowledge that the producers capabilities are able to conduct. Therefore from a governance point of view these capabilities need to be safeguarded and ensure that they’re kept for their firm's eyes only? Nothing could be further from the truth. The simple usage of these capabilities will cause their leakage to outside firms. And it is imperative that the firm consider the use of their capabilities as having the right information deployed by the right people at the right time in the right location as their priority. Governance therefore should be more concerned with the appropriate and timely use of these capabilities in terms of generating value, rather than the hoarding and protection of information that will be released in some form nonetheless, may be generally understood throughout the industry and will be the basis of further innovations and developments in the near future. From Professor Richard Langlois “Organizing the Electronic Century''.
This is the basic modularization of the market economy. It accords well with the modularization G. B. Richardson (1972) suggested in offering the concept of economic capabilities. By capabilities Richardson means "knowledge, experience, and skills" (1972, p. 888), a notion related to what Jensen and Meckling (1992) call "specific knowledge and to what Hayek (1945) called "knowledge of the particular circumstances of time and place." p. 27
If the Joint Operating Committee coordinates these capabilities in the appropriate manner then the externalities will flow to the producers represented there. That is what the governance of the operation is most concerned about. That there was leakage of some explicit knowledge of these capabilities during the operation is immaterial to the externalities and the competitive position of the firm. Recall during our review of Professor Giovanni Dosi for the Preliminary Specification. His research showed that it took an equal and sometimes greater effort to copy another firm's capabilities than it did to generate the capabilities themselves. It is therefore more effective for a firm to focus on their key competitive advantages of their land and asset base, and their specialized earth science and engineering capabilities. In a dynamic, innovative and rapidly changing environment a producer firm wants its key competitive advantage to be state of the art and on the cutting edge at all times. Using the market offerings in ways that encourage and reward those that develop the actual Intellectual Property that make the service industry and other vendors able to support the oil & gas producers and their efforts to generate value. Intellectual Property is not the domain of the oil & gas producers or industry in any way whatsoever. Their value development is a result of the deployment of their tacit knowledge of the resources of the marketplace and what the producers capabilities can do with that knowledge to build value from their oil & gas assets.
Pooling
People, Ideas & Objects are using specialization and the division of labor as the method to increase the performance trajectory and productivity of the industry. We have applied this solution to the earth science and engineering disciplines to deal with the anticipated difficulties in accessing adequate numbers of these resources in the mid to long term. When using the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct of the dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable oil & gas producer we are moving this earth science and engineering knowledge to where the operational decision rights reside to increase accountability for the decisions that are made. Therefore we have eliminated the “operator” designation to introduce our pooling concept.
The capabilities to house “state of the art,” “just in time” earth science and engineering resources necessary to operate each of the properties within one oil & gas firm is believed to be beyond what will be commercially viable in the very near future. This is a result of the further specialization of earth science and engineering skills needed to be attained by each individual and each producer firm within the industry. Under the current environment, with the increased demand for these resources due to retirement and low numbers of people entering the professions, there will be an increase in producers costs as a result of the limited resources supply. Additionally the anticipated increase in throughput necessary to meet the future demands of energy independence. The known fact that each barrel of oil or gas demands more earth science and engineering effort as we consume the “easy” reserves first. When specialization is required, if each producer firm were to maintain the full scope of their capabilities necessary to achieve “operator” status, they would no longer be commercially viable businesses due to this increased demand from specialization. Specialization and the division of labor is the only proven solution to increase the performance and productivity from any and all organizations. Introducing multiples of what is currently available if the ERP supports any revised organizational definition. Therefore under the Preliminary Specifications pooling concept it is necessary for each producer in the Joint Operating Committee to contribute their uniquely specialized capabilities. The objective being to enable the Joint Operating Committee to draw from the much larger pool of the Joint Operating Committees producers capacities of engineers and earth scientists, but also the market offerings, in order to obtain the necessary “operator” scope and scale of capabilities for the properties operation. Additionally, there is the need for the removal and offloading to the marketplace of the lower level technical work from the producer firms to service providers that will specialize and divide their labor on the basis of their skills. Enabling producers to specialize in those highly specific areas of competitive advantage that provide them real tangible value creation.
The producer firm is committed to developing their capabilities with the understanding that they advance their competitive advantages, and earn a return on their investment. They are the critical competitive differentiator in the industry under the Preliminary Specification. How within People, Ideas & Objects ERP software does the producer earn a return on their investment on their capabilities? The most obvious answer is through expanding their petroleum reserves, their production deliverability or by reducing their overall costs on a barrel of oil equivalent basis and therefore expansion of these capabilities through a highly competitive, dynamic and innovative environment. The answer in the short term is to ensure that these critical resources costs are recovered from the costs of oil & gas exploration and production on a day to day basis. Their time and direct charges being recovered from the joint accounts. That is to say that the people (representing the producers capabilities) who are pooled into a Joint Operating Committee, have been assigned a role within the Industrial Command & Control, Job Order and Work Order systems of People, Ideas & Objects et al Preliminary Specification and whose costs are captured in the Partnership Accounting module and are therefore recovering an established second revenue stream from these producers capabilities to offset the cost of building and maintaining these capabilities.
This pooling concept is the solution that People, Ideas & Objects have developed as a replacement to the current “operator” designation. The ability for each producer to have the just-in-time capabilities for all the properties they manage requires, on an industry wide basis, to have surplus or unused and unusable earth science and engineering capabilities to fulfill this just in time nature. This has led to what amounts to a hoarding of these resources by individual producers to meet their just in time needs, causing industry-wide low utilization rates. The ability to pool the producers' highly specialized resources into the Joint Operating Committee releases these otherwise unused and unusable capabilities and facilitates the expansion of specialization and the division of labor to resume. All producers need to contribute their specialized knowledge, skills, experience and ideas they’ve developed in an innovative oil & gas industry. Therefore each of these producers need to have the ability to charge and recover their costs for these resources through the joint account as necessary. Charges being made to either operations or capital expenditures in amounts necessary to earn a return on their specialized capabilities.
A note here to say that this falls under the domain of an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) solution for the following reasons. People, Ideas & Objects noted the research of Professors Anthony Giddens and Wanda Orlikowski in terms of their Structuration Theory and Model of Structuration. In summary these suggest that software defines and supports organizations and therefore also constrains them. Without software to define what an organization is and does then it more or less won’t exist on a commercial basis in the North American oil & gas marketplace. And to seal the producer firm in the definition of the Preliminary Specification is just as inappropriate as today’s business issues continuing in the bureaucrats unchanging ERP software environment. Therefore People, Ideas & Objects, our user community and their service providers are building the Preliminary Specification and a permanent software development capability based on the needs of the dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable oil & gas marketplace. Ensuring the Preliminary Specification and the services associated with it are kept up to date and serving the greater oil & gas economy.
Operational Control
Operational control and innovation are on two opposite ends of the same spectrum. That however does not mean that they can’t be attained by the same organization. The innovative oil & gas producer must have both. One without the other is not worth pursuing. The conflict and contradiction will show up in the organization at some point and the need to deal with it becomes a governance issue. Producers using the Preliminary Specification will have the tools necessary to ensure that the Joint Operating Committee is able to discern the difference between innovative markets and tight operational control.
When the Joint Operating Committee is conducting some field operations it is establishing a one time temporary organization representing individuals from a variety of different sources. Other producers who are partners in the Joint Operating Committee, vendors, suppliers and service providers are some of the sources that make up these temporary organizations. To have operational control over these resources is critical for the success of the innovative oil & gas producers. In the Preliminary Specification we provide a number of tools to enable the Joint Operating Committee to attain high levels of operational control over these temporary organizations.
The first of these tools is what we’ve called the Industrial Command & Control. An ability to impose a chain of command over the resources that span the producers, suppliers, vendors and service providers that are working in the temporary organization that has been established. Next there is the Job Order which is a means in which to execute the plans and operations of this temporary organization during its operation. Simply nothing should be done without the appropriate Job Order being issued from the recognized authority listed in the Industrial Command & Control chain of command first. There is the AFE in which the budget is established and maintained, or possibly a lease. And the Work Order that enables the producers resources to be charged to the Joint Operating Committee ensuring the producers recover the costs they incur in building and maintaining their distinct capabilities.
These are the tools that are at the disposal of the people who are responsible for the operation in the Joint Operating Committee. They are provided to bring a sharp contrast to the freewheeling innovative ways of the market that are healthy for the further development of the innovative oil & gas industry and provide the necessary operational control to have the execution, accountability and success necessary in a dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable oil & gas producer.