What the
Preliminary Specification, our
user community and
service providers represent for the oil and gas industry is the capacity to change, the leadership in the administration, accounting and business model development and realization of the full value of our objective of providing the oil and gas producers with the most
profitable means of oil and gas operations. It is through our value proposition that we are able to quantify and qualify the industry gains of using the software and services that we’ll provide. It’s not enough in the 21st century to own the oil and gas asset. Producers will also need to have access to our software and services that make their assets profitable. What we have seen is that the industries producers are incapable of generating a profit, they are incapable of generating cash! Without the Preliminary Specification, our user community and service providers the industry will fail. The investors and bankers who once believed the producers now see the future of the industry as bleak and are not actively participating in the decline that is underway.
When the user community and their associated service provider organizations are providing the oil and gas industry with the quantifiable increase in their revenues and profitability. Increases that they’re incapable of generating on their own. Increases that are being valued at $25.7 to $45.7 trillion over the next 25 years, only a fool would believe that the administrative and accounting provided by the service providers would use price as one of their key competitive advantages. Why would they? It is the same issue that we see the industry having towards People, Ideas & Objects development
budget. The the high value of the amount of our budget, the payment of Intellectual Property royalties, and the expectation that we would earn substantial profits too! The issues that the producers take with our budget reflect to me that they really not interested in solving problems. Problems that even they can see are quantified in the trillions if only they had the means in which to implement the appropriate solution. They need to pay for that solution, and building that solution is the cost they’ll have to incur in order to earn back what they’ve lost, stem the tide of current losses and build for the future. Otherwise they’ll be headed out of business on the basis of how they’re operating today. It's not our businesses that needs to be corrected, we’re doing fine thanks.
The competitive advantages that the user community and service providers employ are comprehensive and consistent with what a 21st century firm needs to be providing their clients. We have talked about the long list of competitive advantages that they’ll have available to them in order to build value for their producer clients. These have included quality, specialization and the division of labor, innovation based on the administrative and accounting expertise, automation and having the computers work for us. A change from today where the computers have the people shuffling data between here and there. We will relegate the use of computers to what they do best, storage and processing. And the people will involve themselves in the leadership, problem solving, decision making, creative, collaboration, research, ideas, design, planning, thinking, negotiating, compromising, innovating and financing. To name just a few.
I read an article of great interest in the Wall Street Journal the other day. It was discussing the productivity of the oil and gas producers in the field as a result of their application of Artificial Intelligence, automation and other technologies. Suggesting that since the downfall in oil prices in 2014, oil production is much higher at 10.9 mmboe / day, yet oil and gas employment is down 21%. Doing much more with far less as a result of that automation and Artificial Intelligence has provided. Who would have thought, who would have believed? Well I certainly don’t. Deliverability has nothing to do with how many people are employed by the industry. That is not a direct correlation. The industry has not hired any of the people they laid off either. Remember they don’t have the cash. And to suggest that the result of this is that they’ve squeezed higher profits out of the oil is too far of a stretch for me. For your reading enjoyment I’ll provide the two paragraphs that I find the most comical.
From WSJ.
Oil prices are back up to their highest levels in more than three years. U.S. production has topped record levels, hitting 10.9 million barrels a day in the last week of June, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, compared with its high of 9.6 million in 2015. But as of May, nationwide oil and gas employment is down 21% since 2014, according to state and federal data compiled by Karr Ingham, an economist for the Texas Alliance of Energy Producers, an industry group.
The energy sector had been shielded from pressure to innovate by high oil prices. When prices fell 75% over 20 months beginning in 2014, oil and gas companies were finally forced to modernize to squeeze out profits. Many found they could use new technologies to do the work better and cheaper, with fewer people. They have invested billions of dollars on what the industry dubs “digital oil fields,” embracing artificial intelligence, automation and other technologies.
As long as we know it has nothing to do with prolific nature of shale or the layoff's that occurred during this bureaucratic, disastrous downturn.
Since 2014, and even prior to that when it involved the natural gas business, producers have had nothing but excuses as to what will be the results of the never ending “current situation.” “We’re praying for a cold winter,” “it’s OPEC’s fault,”and “next quarter.” To be honest I’ve been laying in wait for the day when the producers attributed any alleged “increased performance” to the application of Artificial Intelligence or Machine Learning. I thought they would use it as an excuse, though in the form of “we’re going to apply Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to the business to gain improvements.” Not that here are the improvements we’ve attained by these technologies. This is very bold statement.
Since 2004 I have been asserting that the issues in the industry are serious and would cut to the core of the industries survivability. Which is exactly what has happened. Taking our breakthrough of using the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct of the dynamic, innovative, accountable and
profitable oil and gas producer. And expanding on that through ten years of research that introduced hundreds of concepts that are codified in the
Preliminary Specification and related documents. These concepts have pushed the industry forward substantially in terms of identifying and resolving the issues that are prevalent in the industry today. As of today, they are not so much considered possibles as necessaries in order to put things back together again. The point I want to make is that at no time did I receive any support from the bureaucrats. On the contrary I was subject to constant abuse and on five different occasions other firms were hired to try and poach my Intellectual Property. None of these other firms were successful and all expressed disappointment that they were used by the oil and gas industry in the fashion that they were to violate others IP. These were substantial companies with premier reputations which included Cambridge Energy Research Associates, McKinsey & Company (twice), Ernst & Young, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. The ideas inherent in the Preliminary Specification have been fought over due to the effect they have in disinter-mediating the bureaucracy.
For those of you who are unaware what Artificial Intelligence is, it’s very much an extension of what engineering and financial modeling have become. Brute force computing of many different scenarios to determine which is the best solution. Artificial Intelligence takes this same approach and applies it to the conceptual level. Creating new concepts that build off what is known today. If I have had nothing but arguments, fights and difficulties in getting the concept of higher, material profitability across to the bureaucrats, what do you think they’ve determined from Artificial Intelligence that has enabled them to a) reduce the head count in the industry, and b) expand the profitability? And where is that profitability? Acceptance of ideas have been always difficult in oil and gas. Maybe some of the most recent stories regarding coiled tubing and Packers Plus would enlighten you on the decades long pursuit they needed before they were accepted in oil and gas. Bureaucrats will stoop to any level to make it sound like their on the job, meanwhile will stop at nothing to ensure that no concept is ever introduced. That they now claim to be benefiting materially from Artificial Intelligence is a certain type of misrepresentation. One I think they should be called upon. It’s all bunk as my grandmother used to say.
The
Preliminary Specification, our
user community and
service providers provide for a dynamic, innovative, accountable and profitable oil and gas industry with the most
profitable means of oil and gas operations. Setting the foundation for profitable North America’s energy independence. People, Ideas & Objects
Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in our future
Initial Coin Offering (ICO) that will
fund these user defined software developments. It is through the process of issuing our ICO that we are leading the way in which creative destruction can be implemented within the oil and gas industry. Users are welcome to join me
here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter
@piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email
here.