Just a Small Difference
The basis of the difference once again is the fact that we are using the cost of capital and overhead in the determination of what the cost of the property is. That no property will produce unless it can produce a profit. Imputing that the oil or gas revenues would need to be adequate to cover all of the costs. Fixed, variable, operational and capital. No matter what the type of cost it would be included in the calculation of what the property required in order to earn a profit. This would therefore remove the production from the marketplace that was being unprofitably produced. Leaving only profitable production in place, based on a complete accounting. Therefore removing a large percentage of the production profile of North America for oil, and most particularly gas. Imputing that much higher commodity prices would be required before the production from shale returned to the market. This would create the market conditions in which shale could be produced profitably. When you have a commodity that can be produced abundantly, this is the only reasonable methodology that will extract the industry from its current situation.
The fault for being in the situation that we are in is mostly attributable to the accounting firms that apply the SEC regulations of full cost accounting and successful efforts. Accountants have had a miserable life. From having their briefcases taken in grade school, to being bullied throughout high school. And some of the accountants that I know are still paying their lunch money to kindergarten bullies! For them to be cool and hip, the center of attention is something that is foreign to them. So when the producer wants to report high levels of profits by leaving the balance sheet bloated. All they have to do is flatter the partner at the accounting firm. As a result the industry ends up with a valuation on the books that is so unreasonable that it makes no sense. It also makes no sense to declare that these producers are profitable. What they really are is marginally cash flow positive. And that is all that they are. As a result of this, they are creating a dynamic which creates a production profile that is inconsistent with the commodity price.
It should be the objective of the producer to have their capital costs depleted fully in a three to four year time frame. From a business point of view there are many reasons to want to do this. We don’t need to go into them here. Full cost accounting and successful efforts define the limit of what can be capitalized, not what is reasonable from a business point of view. If after three to four years the property will achieve the point where it has returned all of its capital and will be able to earn a profit from that point forward. Or at least it should be able to. In the process however the commodity prices are high enough that the return on that investment can be adequate to provide a good return of the capital. Which is something that a ponzi scheme is consistently unable to achieve.
The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.