Our Tactical Plan for the User Community

It is clear to People, Ideas & Objects that the prospective user community participant will not subscribe or participate in these developments until the funds are secured. This has always been understood to be the case. We do however expect that the leadership team will begin their participation at any time. It was on the basis of the leadership teams existence that we would be able to prove to the investor community that we were able to provide an alternative means of organization to them. And then raise our budget on that basis. That was before we were presented with this opportunity to raise our budget in 2015 based on the decline in oil prices. That is, with both the oil and the gas sides of the business performing poorly. Investors will be looking for alternatives to the bureaucracy and therefore the budget can be raised, our leadership team, user community and the Preliminary Specification developed in that order.

If we understand the scope and scale of the Preliminary Specification it involves the work that is done within the oil and gas industry, there is little that is conducted outside of the application. Once we adopt the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct of the dynamic, innovative and profitable oil and gas producer there is little within the industry that is untouched as a result. Therefore we need to include these elements within the application to ensure that it operates in an integrated and functional manner. Therefore the user community will be drawn from the entire population of the oil and gas industry personnel. They will also bring to the application their needs and desires of “what” and “how” they do their jobs. This way we can build the applications, whether for the desktop or mobile, so that they are done efficiently and effectively.

If it takes at least six months to fully comprehend the role the user has within the producer organization. And this is based on the many years of industry experience that a user may have acquired. You can see the value that the user brings to the software development process. When we expect that the costs of user community developments will total $667 million. Total 2,000 man years of time and involve a population of approximately 3,000 individuals. We can see the scope of the undertaking that we are contemplating. And this is what is budgeted for in the initial commercial release. We expect that the user community will continue on in an ever changing and constantly improving manner for the entire time the application is operational in the oil and gas industry. Participation as a user community participant should be considered as a new career choice.

This is in stark contrast to the current model of hiring a number of consultants from the various accounting firms to conduct user development, installation and integration of ERP software. These somehow never have the resources required to complete the user development attributes. As is evident by our budget we're not going that way. We do however have a budget for Oracle consultants. These are primarily for our developers in terms of understanding the Oracle product line.

If you feel that this scope and scale is out of line with what is reasonable in the oil and gas industry I would point out that our value proposition is in the trillions of dollars. And those trillions of dollars are on top of the costs that have already been incurred by the industry. So our value proposition is valued in pre tax profits. We are providing the oil and gas investor with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas production. That imputes everything involved in the industry to attain production. Therefore the investors investment in us will leverage off the many investments that have been made in the past one hundred years. That is the power of software today, however software is useless unless it is in the hands of an enabled and empowered user community.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Rememberance Day

There is no posting today in recognition of Remembrance Day.

What a Mess

There are no doubt a few bloody noses and some angry people as a result of my words Friday. I've made it pretty clear that I share the bureaucracies belief that they won't participate in this software development project, the user community or the service providers. They have ignored me up until now. That is the normal procedure you follow with respect to a pest. But when that pest becomes a danger, as we have now that the Saudi’s are dropping the price of oil and the bureaucrats are going to be losing money, and therefore won't have a leg to stand on, they will therefore be looking to exterminate that pest. So yesterday I made sure that they know I’m ready for the fight. Let us begin, and may the best business model win!

And this battle will be short lived and intense. I think the investors are going to be looking quickly for an alternative. Prospective members of the user community could help in sending our message out further and faster. That would help everyone. Other than that keep your head down and watch the show. I promise it will be enjoyable and there is no reason for anyone else to be involved in this fight. It’s just me vs. the bureaucrats. The Preliminary Specification vs. the status quo. And the referee will be the investors who have to call the fight to determine who the winner is. And the winner will be the one that operates the industry on a go forward basis.

That is for the foreseeable future. The next 20 to 30 years. A continuation of the bureaucrats and their losses, with no strategy, vision or prayers as to how to make money other than for themselves. Or a vision of how we provide the industry with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. One based on the Preliminary Specification which is defined and controlled by the user community. The choice is stark. The scope and scale of change is significant, approximately equivalent to the changes that are being experienced in the oil and gas industry itself. This is the choice that the investors are being asked to be make and what the fight will be about. There are trillions of dollars at stake, and maybe so much more.

There is the point of our user community. Which is our primary focus and will always be. User defined software developments are substantially different than other software developments in my opinion. The user community is our source of quality and success. They will be the reason that the industry achieves the dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. Our cultivation of the community will continue until we have it developed to the level that it can begin developments of the software. And it will never stop developing for the 20 or 30 years that we are the means in which the industry is operated.

We started this week noting that we were taking on what we have now quantified and qualified as the “fight” against the bureaucracy. This is in order to raise our budget in what we describe as the “opportunity” that we find ourselves in.  An opportunity present now that the Saudi’s are “teaching” the shale producers the lesson of “production discipline.” I have set the context and the tone this week. This battle will continue on through the better part of 2015. And believe me you have the right candidate to provoke and antagonize the bureaucrats in your corner. There is nothing that I enjoy more than a fight and I am itching for this one. This however will not take our focus off the development of the user community. And starting Monday we will begin again with our discussion of the user community. The fight will play on in 2015 and there is not too much that will happen in 2014. And with that I should announce I will be taking six weeks off from December 1, 2014. Time which gives the bureaucrats a chance to clean the place up from the mess they made yesterday.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

"I Did It My Way"

Today I want to address the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room. And that is our budget. It’s controversial and contentious because no one has seen anything like it in the ERP marketplace of the oil and gas industry before. Lets also be clear we will be looking to raise the full $4 billion in funds in order to begin the developments of the Preliminary Specification. I am certain that our costs will be in the range defined in the outer limit of our budget. And for a number of reasons detailed later in this post we will be looking to raise the full amount. The issue and the controversial aspect of the budget is the payment of the Intellectual Property royalty to me, and the net profits. These two items total half of the budget and nothing of its kind has ever been proposed, or paid, in the industry before.

As detailed in earlier posts and elsewhere; the time that I have spent on this project is significant. I started it in 1992. If the industry can come up with a timely solution to its problems that competes with the Preliminary Specification they can begin the process that I started way back when. This blog reflects much of the ten years of applied research that was done in order to take the idea of using the Joint Operating Committee as the key organizational construct of the dynamic, innovative and profitable oil and gas producer. An idea that I first published in August of 2003. And moving it to the situation we have today. Some people may consider that I am lucky that the oil and gas prices declined and the decentralized production model just happened to meet the needs of the industry. I don’t care. I'll have the royalty payments that prove that the industry needed the solution to solve the trillions in potential revenues that they were losing. I have always been able to generate significant value in the work that I do. It’s no coincidence that I also generate significant controversy. The money is how I keep score.

So we can continue on with the controversy and the losses in the producer firms. To me it only matters that the industry provides me with the up front payment of the budget first and foremost. The first reason of course is to pay myself the royalty. Secondly I will deliver the program in its first commercial release in a timely manner and as a result earn the profits that are identified in the budget. If I fail or have difficulties, then the profits that I realize will be diminished. The issue of the up front payment also has to do with the fact that the bureaucracy have chosen, in every instance, not to work with me. Even when faced with the difficulties in their business. Reasonable people faced with the difficulties in their business would have turned to those that have solutions. They will never do that. If I have to be accountable to the bureaucracy in any way it will surely be my demise. By moving the money under my stewardship as the first act of the industries participation in these developments. Ensures that I will be able to deal with the issues as they arise. And the bureaucrats can continue to manage the industry for the short time they have left.

It is our commitment to the user community and the service providers who are providing the removal and replacement to the bureaucracy that will be the keys to the transition. Technology is disintermediating industries all over the world. Just ask the record store manager, or his distributor. Yesterday I detailed how the industries investors were led down the primrose path to build the industry while prices were low. So that when prices did turn higher they would reap what they sowed. This was a farce and the investors were fleeced. The bureaucracy have played the ultimate ponzi scheme and I’m saying to the bureaucrats you're busted. We're offering an alternative. And in reality its a pretty inexpensive alternative compared to what the bureaucracy is currently charging the investors, and will be charging them in the future with no vision or strategy. And, no prayers. So maybe the people in industry think that our scope and scale is out of line with what is historical in the industry. That paying for Intellectual Property is inconsistent with the industries history. I think we've had enough history from the bureaucracy, and I'm declaring that they're toast.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

"Its Just a Flesh Wound"

Those were some of the last words of the “Black Knights” in the movie “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.” They're what immediately came to mind when I read the response of the oil and gas producers to the Saudis discounting of oil for import into the U.S.

What happened on Tuesday was the Saudis began discounting the oil that they sold into the U.S. marketplace. This was in contrast to price increases that were made in the rest of the world. Isolating the U.S. market, and I think specifically the shale producers. Making it unquestionably the shale producers that are the focus of the Saudis concerns regarding the global overproduction of oil. That if the shale producers in the U.S. want to produce at capacity, then the Saudis will produce at capacity, as will the whole of Opec. That is the message that was sent on Tuesday.

On Wednesday the producers responded in a consistent fashion. In a Bloomberg Businessweek article. Saying more or less that “Its just a flesh wound” is not far off from their actual comments. Here is a quote from the Businessweek article.

Executives at several large U.S. shale producers, including Chesapeake and EOG Resources Inc. (EOG:US), have vowed to maintain -- and even raise -- production as they reported earnings this week. They say their success in bringing down costs means they can make money even if prices slump further.

Its obvious to me that the Saudis are playing the long game and the shale producers are playing the short game. This is how I see the situation playing out in the next few quarters. First of all the oil prices are trading on rumor and innuendo. There is no stated policy at this time by anyone in the marketplace. Once there is a stated policy the market will move to reflect that policy. Opec is meeting on November 27, 2014. Which very interestingly happens to be three days after the Americans announce their negotiations with Iran regarding nuclear weapons. What we might see is no change in the announced production quotas and no concern by Opec for the markets pricing. We might also see no date for another Opec meeting set. This will throw the bottom of the market open for a freefall. Finding the low of the oil price market within the 2014 year end period of time. Just about the time that the accountants will retrospectively be looking to value the reserves of the producers for their annual reports. Creating even larger losses for the producers.

Playing the short game when they should be playing the long game, the producers are falling into the Saudis hands here by making the foolish comments that they are making. The investors who are concerned at the losses that the producers have been creating in the gas side of the business, are now beginning the process of losing money on the oil side of the business as well. Investors have already had enough of the fiscal irresponsibility created by these bureaucrats. They don't need to increase, and by a substantial margin, their losses by these fools losing money on both the oil and gas sides of the business. The investors will be forced to act and within a short period of time to deal with the problem within the oil and gas bureaucracy. And that’s where we, the Preliminary Specification, the user community and service providers come in.

The Saudis are playing the long game and can do so for a significant period of time. They have almost one trillion U.S. dollars in reserves. An effective weapon when you consider the enemy is screaming at you with no arms and no legs.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Herding Cats

It is the tradition in the oil and gas ERP software marketplace that the software provider will raise their capital from the investment community and banks. For a variety of reasons People, Ideas & Objects have chosen not to participate in those methods of raising capital. Those reasons are detailed in our Revenue Model and essentially state that the oil and gas community is too small of a market in which to leverage any investment. The producers themselves know this market is small and have frequently abused the fact that the software provider, who has invested all their investors money, has a limited market to sell to, and as such has very little if any bargaining power. The investment community is wise to this and that avenue is most certainly off limits to us when they see the scope and scale of our budget.

That leaves us with dealing with the producers themselves. Something we have chosen not to do ourselves, again. I have frequently referred to this job as herding cats. You have a handful of producers moving in the right direction, you try to get a few more, and then a shiny object attracts the attention of the others and they're gone again. I have stated in the past that I won't be doing this anymore and I stand by that claim. Working with the producers at this time would be nothing more than working with cats. The added difficulty to this process is that when the CEO was interested in what we were selling. He would naturally pass it down to the CFO and IT manager for further evaluation before any decision was made. The IT manager has no interest in eliminating his department and his job. And the CFO has no interest in having all of his staff moved to the service providers. Which are the results of implementing our software. It is the solemn oath of a bureaucrat that “thou shall not reduce ones staff unnecessarily.” Therefore the recommendation that the CEO will receive will be one of thumbs down. And no matter how much we appeal to the CEO he can’t make the move without the staff, it would create a mutiny in short order.

Therefore we need to create a situation that we can appeal to the investors who own the industry. Those that have significant influence in the operation of the industry as well. We have seen these people, they work quietly in the background and generally get what they want. What we have to do is to appeal to their sensibilities and provide them with a compelling value proposition that deals with the issues and opportunities that exists in the oil and gas industry. Some might argue that these people don't have the influence in the industry that they once had. I say you're listening to a bureaucrat who thinks that they have the upper hand in the relationship. That is because they have had the upper hand for a while now. What we are offering the oil and gas investor is an alternative means of organization based on the Preliminary Specification, defined by the user community and operated by the service providers. This alternative is offered as a removal and replacement of the bureaucracy and has a value proposition valued in the trillions of dollars. This value proposition is so high because the issues and opportunities are so grand as a result of the abuse that the bureaucracy has incurred through their belief that they have the upper hand.

So what are these issues and opportunities. Certainly the profitability under the Preliminary Specification is one of the opportunities. However, the investors were told that during the 1980’s and 1990’s that survival in the industry was the name of the game. And that the building out of the industry in the long term, so that when the time came and higher prices would arrive, they would be in position to realize the benefits of those higher prices. Those higher prices did arrive in the 21st century. And the bureaucracy realized the benefits through stock options and bonuses that were valued in the billions. However, the investors did not necessarily profit as a result of the higher prices. The costs of production in many cases exceeded the gains in the prices. Where was the benefit for the investors that was promised them as a result of building out the industry? It seemed to have been contributed mostly to the bureaucrats in higher bonuses and stock options. Now the prices are in steep decline and the bureaucrats pray for cold winters. That is the scope, scale and the depth of the bureaucrats capabilities. Prayers. I think this year they have seen how stupid they looked last year praying for a cold winter and now don’t even ask for that. So the investors stock valuation did not trade up on the increase in commodity prices because the bureaucrats were unable to increase the profits that were made. The investors would have been better off investing in the commodity exchange, not the stock exchange. Now the stocks of the companies are being significantly affected as a result of the declines in the commodities. And what do the bureaucrats say and do? I haven't received any calls. And I don't expect any from any of the bureaucrats. It’s paragraphs like this one that make them angry. Which is the only emotion they can express.

So when we say we are looking to fund our budget by the oil and gas investors we think we have a group of like minded people who are interested in what we have to offer. They can direct the individual producers to participate in these developments and fund our budget. After all we offer the industry the opportunity to implement a continental wide price maker strategy. One that is driven by the individual producers profits. What a concept. The thing I like about it best is that I don't have to herd cats.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

The Origins of two Different Perspectives

There is a clash of two different perspectives when we discuss the impact of the Preliminary Specifications decentralized production model. The shutting-in of properties to reduce the market supply of commodities is contrary to the current practice within the industry. For one thing it is not currently possible to shut-in properties due to the impact on the producer in terms of their overheads. They are using the high throughput production model which requires production to continue at capacity to deal with their fixed, high overheads and infrastructure. However, the bureaucrats also believe that the manner in which to deal with low oil or natural gas prices is to curtail capital expenditures until the market responds. In terms of the low natural gas prices, which have continued for many years now, someone should ask the bureaucrats how this strategy is working. And now that Opec is also producing oil at capacity, will that strategy of reducing capital expenditures work for oil?

The strategy of curtailing capital expenditures is an engineering inspired strategy. By reducing the number of wells that are drilled during subsequent years the surplus capacity in the marketplace will be absorbed and prices will rebound to the point where profits will return. This has worked in the past. However, it has taken many years before the changes in prices have been seen. Participation by the producers is not always equal either. Some producers feel it is an opportune time to expand their market share, and as such expand their capital expenditure programs. I have described this strategy as a blunt instrument due its inability to achieve the desired result within a reasonable period of time. In theory we have seen the natural gas producers operating under this scenario for the past six years. The time in which natural gas prices have collapsed from their traditional 6 to 1 pricing to the current 20 to 1 in comparison to oil. If the strategy was valid it would have worked by now.

The origins of the Preliminary Specifications decentralized production model are more from the business side. In that profits are what dictate production. And profits are what drive the investment in producers. If producers are not profitable, in theory, why would an investor continue to participate in the producer. Therefore the producer would cease to operate in the marketplace. Production discipline is therefore imputed through the market mechanism that only production that is profitable is produced. Producers that adhere to that principle will receive a welcome response from the investment capital markets.

Engineers and geologists have been the operational and executive members at the helm of the oil and gas industry for the better part of its history. The business is a science and that is the way that it should be operated. However, in terms of the production output of the industry it needs to be profitable. Its not a science experiment, its a business. And the business needs to generate economic value. Something that has been lost in the day to day mindset of the industry. This is evident in the activities of the current “must have” asset. Today its shale. Yesterday it was heavy oil. Before that it was SAGD. And before that it was… whatever. Today producers have to employ production discipline in order to bring this science experiment into the commercial realm.

The accounting I think has been at fault. I think People, Ideas & Objects developed out of the need to address the shortfall in the accounting and systems in the industry. My hypothesis is that in the 1960’s when computers were introduced, accountants asked themselves what they’d be used for. The accounting, tax, royalties and compliance requirements were the natural needs. This continued for a few decades and the isolation of working on those topics created a separation between the compliance and governance of the firm, which has become the exclusive domain of the current accounting function, and the business of the business. By reintroducing the Joint Operating Committee as we are in the Preliminary Specification. We are moving the compliance and governance frameworks of the hierarchy into alignment with the legal, financial, operational decision making, cultural, communication, innovation and strategic frameworks of the Joint Operating Committee. Once we complete this alignment then we achieve the speed, innovativeness, accountability and profitability that we desire in our organizations. This clarity in accounting will provide the engineering and geological resources with the ability to better understand the business that they operate. Allowing them to compete in the profitable oil and gas industry.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Budget Developments

It's now November 3, 2014 and we are two months away from recording our first of three years of user community development. It is at this time that I would assert that People, Ideas & Objects have established some credibility in terms that we are user community based software developments. It is our primary focus and will be until we have the community established to the point where we can rely on it to drive the developments of our Preliminary Specification. A difficult undertaking and one that I think is worthwhile in the history of the oil and gas industry. Establishment of the user community will enable us to build the kind of software that solves the current issues and opportunities in the industry. And take on the challenges in the future.

Today the user community has an opportunity within the oil and gas industry that needs to be resolved. It has been our plan that we would prepare, organize and present ourselves to the investors of this industry with an alternative means of organization of the oil and gas industry. That they could then choose to select either the current bureaucracy or, People, Ideas & Objects Preliminary Specification, the user community and service providers as the alternative that they wanted to run the industry. That this decision would be made in January of 2017 and if we were chosen, then fund our budget at that time. That was and is the plan. Our commitment to the development of the user community will continue in the same manner that I had planned for 2015 as was the case before.

However, this issue with Opec pushing the oil prices down has thrown the cat amongst the pigeons, as they would say. Oil is no longer able to carry the losses in the natural gas side of the business and the producers are going to be showing even poorer financial performance than in the past few years. Producers stock market capitalizations have reflected significant losses in market value. Our appeal to the investors may never be as promising as they might be in the next six months.

Therefore we will be active in terms of our attempts to raise our budget within this time frame as well as maintain our focus on developing the user community. If there is a point where we are overloaded in terms of commitments we will defer to the user community developments as our priority. We are only chasing this opportunity to raise our budget for its timeliness. The issue of the bureaucracies performance will be well within the mindset of the investor in January 2017 as much as it might be in the next six months, maybe more. Time in terms of raising our budget is on our side. We cannot afford to waste any time in terms of the development of the user community. The ultimate delivery of our product, the user community, the service providers and solving the problem for the industry relies on our diligence in terms of developing the user community. By taking this opportunity to chase our budget might provide us with the opportunity to knock a year off our timeline by starting our developments in January 2016, IF we can develop the user community within that short of period of time.

Once again I see within our logs that we are beginning to have the success in the development of the user community. People are beginning the early part of the process of joining the user community by reviewing this blog and the wiki. Learning what they can about the ideas on how to run the industry in a better way. And beginning to think how they too can participate and improve upon it. I think this could be some of the most exciting work that has been undertaken in the industry. Putting the bureaucrats in the unemployment lines. And building a new and better way to operate the oil and gas industry.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Recalculating Our Value Proposition

Members of the user community need to update their value proposition in terms of the changes that are occurring in the oil side of the business. If oil is being affected by the Saudi’s in the manner that we spoke of in yesterday’s post. Then the value proposition that is provided by People, Ideas & Objects, the user community and service providers is enhanced substantially. We haven't discussed how the calculations of our value proposition is prepared for a while so I thought now might be a good time to prepare an update.

Simply we should calculate the incremental value of the People, Ideas & Objects software that the user community develops, and the service providers implements and operates for the oil and gas industry. That calculation begins by determining what incremental value is generated above the current base case. What we can deem the base case consists of is the current bureaucracies “price taker” strategy in both the oil and the gas sides of the business. We also need to calculate the incremental value that is earned by the producer through the specialization and division of labor that are attained through the continuous development of the administrative and accounting capabilities within the domain of the industry.

Lets deal with this last point first, specialization and the division of labor. These are two of the many tools that the user community can apply as the resource that determines “what” and “how” the People, Ideas & Objects software will do. Using automation, process management, computers, and other tools to continuously refine the specialization and division of labor of the administration and accounting processes and capabilities of the oil and gas industry. These will eliminate the bureaucracy and achieve higher levels of output in terms of the oil and gas production from the same resource base.

The second element of our value proposition is our decentralized production model which enables the oil and gas producer to become a “price maker.” This is in direct contrast to the “price taker” strategy that the bureaucracy has accepted throughout its administration of the industry. With shale based reserves moving the oil and gas industry into an era of abundance it is necessary to move the industry mindset from its current belief that demand is insatiable. To one where production is easily obtained and that can overwhelm demand. And therefore the need to allocate production on the only reasonable and fair methodology, that being profitability of the producing property, is necessary.

Therefore to price this aspect of our value proposition it is assumed that we have the capacity to double the current natural gas prices and bring the natural gas reserves into a profitable situation for the producers. If we doubled the value of all the natural gas reserves, including the shale based reserves, we would easily obtain our claim that our value proposition is in the trillions of dollars. Based on yesterday’s post we are now able to make the similar claim in the oil side of the business and could add incremental value from that business. As a result, our claim that we provide trillions of dollars in value to the dynamic, innovative and profitable oil and gas producer is what every member of the user community could and will be saying to differentiate their services from those otherwise unprofitable bureaucrats.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here. 

Raging Against the Bureaucracy

To be able to join the user community and participate in the development of the software of People, Ideas & Objects you really need to have a deep felt rage toward the bureaucracy. I know I have it and many other people do too. Especially the investors that we will be appealing too to provide us with the financial resources to support the user community and build the software. Now I know its inappropropriate to rage against anyone in this politically correct world. However if we look at the oil and gas industry today we see a very disturbing trend. I think it started when the oil and gas prices took off in the early part of this century. The budgets of the various departments of the firms became a little soft and no one has been able to remember the type of size or configuration of what a profitable oil and gas producer looks like.

What has happened since the early part of this century is that the empire builders have begun to understand the game as it is played. And instead of building a company, the domain of budgets and the number of people are all that bureaucrats are concerned about. Simply the stuff that makes their blood flow. What we have now in my estimation, at least in Canada, is at least half of our organizations are bureaucratic waste. That’s correct I think if we lost half the people in the industry we would be far better off than we are today. Now if you're still reading this you belong in the user community as the people that have stopped reading have found it too painful to listen to, those being the bureaucrats.

One needs to ask themselves for what purpose does a bureaucrat exist today? Well there are the friends that keep the bureaucrats self confidence high. And there are the wife and kids, and the private school that they no doubt attend. These are the things that provide for the reasons for the existence of a bureaucrat. But my question was more oriented to the use and productivity within the organization and specifically from the point of view of a dynamic, innovative and profitable oil and gas producer. They are but a cost, and a healthy cost at that. And they incur costs, many of them in the manner of time and energy of others. But in terms of productivity within the producer firm it would be a tall tale for one to believe that bureaucrats provide any value to the producer firm.

Take the situation that we find ourselves in today. Technology provides a means in which to deal with the administration and accounting of an oil and gas producer. And the Preliminary Specification aligns the compliance and governance frameworks of the hierarchy with the seven frameworks of the Joint Operating Committee. Enabling greater speed, innovativeness, accountability and profitability. Why with the technology that can be developed today are we still constrained by bureaucracies? Are bureaucracies and technology not mutually exclusive? Doesn't one eliminate the other? Yes they do. And that is why I write to you from outside the industry. There is no bureaucrat operating in the oil and gas industry today with a vested interest in developing the technology to eliminate themselves. They have the game fixed in their favour and as far as they are concerned it will stay that way.

So it comes down to the question of... “do you hire the bureaucrats to run the oil and gas industry, or do you spend the time, energy and money to build the systems, user community and service providers to offer an alternative to that archaic, lethargic, unchanging, and losing proposition the bureaucrats? Guess which side I'm on. Your suspicions were correct that not everyone could be part of the user community or the service providers. We don't need any bureaucrats to run the industry. We can do it much better with fewer people. And some may say that’s a bad thing because we will be putting a lot of people out of work. And I say, in this case we should look at it as significant progress.

The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative and profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.