The Preliminary Specification Part LXVI (AV Part VII)

Just a couple of small points to follow up on in this second pass through the Preliminary Specifications Accounting Voucher. Conceptually I think we may have captured all the significant areas in the published parts of this module. That doesn’t mean that the community won’t have significant changes to the specification, I’m sure they will. Its just that as it stands now, the contribution that I am able to make in starting the Accounting Voucher discussion is conceptually complete, and the remainder will be for further clarification.

We have discussed the point of Designing Transactions in the Accounting Voucher before. It comes to mind that we currently use a basic form of transaction design in oil and gas today. And as I mentioned elsewhere in the Preliminary Specification series, designing transactions is the type of work that is done by Lawyers in most commercial transactions. The transaction that I was referring to was the drilling contract which has a list of the categories of work that is being done during the drilling of the well. Under each category the producer is able to select whom will provide the service, the drilling contractor, a third party or the producer.

With the automation of systems, and the understanding of the other modules contained within the Preliminary Specification. It would be optimal to automate this and other interfaces within the People, Ideas & Objects application; such that the contracts, negotiations, execution and invoicing could be automated to the highest levels. This is the opportunity that the community faces in taking these “ideas” and making them real through the development of this system. That is the reason for the large budget in terms of the Preliminary Specification and overall software development.

The second item I wanted to discuss today was related to that level of automation. Transaction Cost Economics talks about the costs of processing transactions. Where if the costs of processing transactions is high, it is best to centralize them within the firm where they don’t have to be individually itemized. Or if the costs are small then they are best to be provided by the marketplace. By automating transactions we are able to reduce their costs to almost a negligible level. With the costs of transactions being so low, moving transactions to the market is the natural choice for the industry to undertake. And that supports a heavier reliance on the division of labor that we have discussed here and in other modules on many occasions.

So when we discuss the pooling concept in the Partnership Accounting module it is assumed that the costs of these resources will be recorded in an automated fashion in the Accounting Voucher. Reducing the transactions costs is the opportunity that we have and the technology provides the means in which to implement it.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. Email me here if you need an invite.

The Preliminary Specification Part LXV (AV Part VI)

Its very 1970’s ish to be thinking of a Purchase Order system. The 1970’s is the last time that I can think of any one ever using one. (It certainly might be used in the larger firms, however, I am unaware of this.) The practicality and usefulness of these systems seemed to have vaporized in the 1980’s and no one has considered their existence since. Now we talk in terms of Supply-Chains, however oil and gas doesn’t have a “supply-chain” as the term is used. Supply chains are for retail and manufacturing. Purchasing is for oil and gas.

I would reiterate that the use of a Purchase Order system is something that the user community needs to determine if it wants one. I see substantial value in building one and these posts will attempt to document how that value can be realized.

The Purchase Order system is part of the Accounting Voucher in that it is a necessary part of the processing of any large capital item. The use and application of the AFE, Cost Centre or Lease charge code remains the same irrespective of the Purchase Orders existence or not. There is no change in the coding structure as a result of the inclusion of the purchase order number. The Accounting Voucher relies on the Purchase Order for further approval of the specific contract dealing with a particular vendor on a specific project.

There are a number of cases where the management of the vendor relationship needs to have special considerations. Particularly in oil and gas where the details of the project are specific and large. Engineering contracts for the building of gas plants, pipelines and facilities are some of the examples. Situations where the contract must meet certain criteria and the vendor must qualify to meet those criteria during a bidding process. Its of concern to the producers that the firm that is chosen is capable of undertaking the work that is described. It is not just a lowest cost and the bid wins type of contract bidding process. This overall bidding process falls under the larger Purchase Order process of the Preliminary Specifications Accounting Voucher.

Once the vendor has been selected then the approval of the invoices is subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. Any prepayments or partial payments can be processed on the basis of the strength of the Purchase Order document and the final payment is subject to the satisfactory completion of the contract. If the contract is subject to any hold backs and other conditions, then those would be applied within the Accounting Vouchers payments.

The Purchase Order system is designed to provide the producer(s) with a level of control over large contracts. Something that is done frequently in oil and gas. By managing the bidding process and providing a level of control over the contract in terms of making and controlling the payment process. The Purchase Order, I think is a valuable tool in any producers system. Having these contained within the Accounting Voucher of the Preliminary Specification is the natural placement of these control processes.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part LXIV (PA Part XI)

Yesterday we discussed the manner in which the division of labor and specialization could increase the throughput of the engineering and geological capabilities of the oil and gas industry. How the mountains of this type of work could be approached by pooling the technical resources of the producers represented in the Joint Operating Committee. Today I want to talk about how the cost of those resources would be recognized and recovered in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification. What this blog post is also about is the multitude of equalization's that need to be taken into consideration each month for each producer in order to calculate their working interest share of the property. And how the Joint Operating Committee authorizes these funding requirements.

The first issue that needs to be dealt with is who is going to charge for work done at a Joint Operating Committee and why. For that we need to revisit the Work-Order system that is part of the People, Ideas & Objects application modules. Recall that these are based on the AFE, lease or overhead accounts of the partnership and are therefore a pre-approved means of controlling the costs. Without a valid work-order no one can be charging any work to an AFE, lease or overhead account. And with a work order, only the work that is authorized through an AFE, lease or overhead account will be completed.

For the purposes of this post, we have an example that assumes your firm has contributed two engineers and two geologists to a property that is producing a positive cash flow in the current month. The part-time costs associated with the authorized work was part of an AFE approved by the partnership, and the work order was prepared by one of the producer firms. The hourly costs of these employees is captured in the work order and calculated based on standard costs. These standard costs are then charged to the joint account as represented in the Partnership Accounting module with an appropriate revenue offset for your firm for providing the engineers and geologists. For the purposes of accounting lets suggest we process this accounting entry. The reason for the $900 is the standard costs vs. the actual costs of $1,000.

Dr.     Salaries          1,000.00
Cr. Payroll                1,000.00

Dr.     Joint Account  900.00
Cr. Revenue Offset            900.00

Now when the clearing of the accounts at month end occurs there is also an equalization so that any contribution that any producer made to the joint account can be taken into consideration. These can take the form of whatever is agreed to by the partners and this example assumes that technical resources have been agreed to. The case that we are assuming here is going to distribute the $900.00 in engineering costs to the partners. If you had a 25% working interest share then you would therefore be responsible for and charged $225.00 of these costs. And the Revenue Offset would be processed at 100% or $900.00 as a revenue item. Therefore the net proceeds in the joint account of this transaction would be revenue of $675.00.

Now this example was a cash flow positive scenario and the question needs to be asked what happens when the Joint Operating Committee is in the very familiar situation where it doesn’t have any revenue. This situation remains the same. The net $675.00 in the above example is derived through the payment of the costs by the other partners and that remains the same. This producer would still show a Revenue Offset of $900.00 on their Statement of Expenditures and the net balance would, since it has no revenue, be for a cost, not an income.

How these equalization’s are handled is proposed to be automated through the Work Order system of the People, Ideas & Objects application modules. Capturing the time of the individuals as they worked on the specific approved project would generate the above accounting entries. Then the clearing of the accounts would account for any subsequent equalization’s at months end.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part LXIII (PA Part X)

Today I want to spend some more time in the Partnership Accounting module of the Preliminary Specification discussing the pooling of human resources between producers into a Joint Operating Committee. Also discuss the justification for why we need to do the pooling and a bit about the division of labor and specialization in order for the industry to increase its throughput and activity level.

The first point is the most controversial and suggests an alternative way to how the bureaucracy manages their technical capabilities today. Today the bureaucracy builds silo’s of engineering and earth science capacities that are capable of dealing with any and all contingencies that the firm may face. This is a reasonable approach to a difficult business, with the inherent risk profile that oil and gas has, safety is a priority which can be handled in this manner. The problem arises as a result of each and every producer replicating the same capabilities within their organizations. As a result the industry has unused capacity that is unavailable for use at any time and at any place in the industry. At a time when the engineering and earth science talent is at a premium in terms of demand, this hoarding of resources will only continue to escalate.

What if there was a way in which firms could release the surplus earth science and engineering capacity and alleviate the market demand on these resources. Yet still have that surplus capacity available to them. Do this at a lower overall cost and have a higher throughput at the same time. Sounds impossible but that is what is required to solve the problems the industry is faced with today.

If we were able to pool the technical resources from each of the producers who represent the Joint Operating Committee. Then we begin to break down the individual silo’s and the hoarding problem. One of the key advantages of using the Joint Operating Committee is that all of the partners are financially motivated. Consensus is easily achieved because of this and that will continue.

Now I know the difference between a good engineer and a super star. The perception that “our” capabilities are better then “theirs” type of comparisons. The problem will however come down to, in the hoarding situation, no one is left to do the bread and butter engineering that should have been done two weeks ago. Life is one percent inspiration, ninety nine percent perspiration. The bread and butter issues are what need to be taken care of. How the majority of the bread and butter work gets done is the focus of this blog post.

The solution to where the enhanced engineering and geological throughput comes from is where the division of labor and specialization come into play. But first let me reiterate that in this day and age, to manage a process, or to change a process requires that the software to manage that process be built first. People, Ideas & Objects are proposing to build these processes for industry so that these changes can be made. It is not enough to attempt to make the changes in the business without the software. That should be painfully obvious. It was in the Preliminary Research Report that I stated this, and the bureaucracy have interpreted this to mean, by ensuring no changes take place to the software, ensures they are unchallenged in their current role.

To approach the mountains of earth science and engineering work that needs to be done will require a new approach based on the tried and true division of labor and specialization principles. By breaking down the jobs into smaller more specialized components the process can be managed in a way that is faster and more efficient. The productivity of this process would be an order of magnitude more efficient then what is done today. This process would be managed through the Partnership Accounting module with the Military Command & Control Metaphor to maintain the chain of command and authority from the producer firms. What may have taken 6 engineers and geologists on a full time basis may now be done by 35 part time engineers and geologists. These engineers and geologists may be assigned to over 100 properties or Joint Operating Committees. Management of the process, as one can see, is the key to productivity. The point of the exercise would be to get the bread and butter engineering and earth science work completed.

The need to have a system that can cost these resources is what we will discuss tomorrow. How the industry ultimately organizes the bread and butter engineering and earth science that needs to be done, whether in-house, or out-sourced is unknown. However, the ability to manage the process and cost them to the joint account will be necessary.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. Email me here if you need an invite.

The Preliminary Specification Part LXII (PA Part IX)

We move now to our second pass through the Partnership Accounting module. Now that we have also made our initial pass through the Accounting Voucher we are able to compare some of the similarities and differences between these two modules. That is the topic of this blog post, how in the Preliminary Specification the Partnership Accounting and the Accounting Voucher work together to solve the difficulties in dealing with the accounting issues for the Joint Operating Committee.

The best way to continue to describe the similarities and differences are to pick up the discussion of the Material Balance Report. When we last discussed the report in the Accounting Voucher we noted that the voucher needed to balance the debits and credits as well as volumetrically for material, system and partnership balance. Note that these are all the monthly variables that have to do with either financial transactions or production volumes for the current month. Therefore these monthly variables would be processed through the Accounting Voucher. Also note that these balances are for the 100% working interest share of the Joint Operating Committee. How does the producer know that their share is calculated correctly?

We also discussed a “template” that contained information that was used to process the monthly variables. The wells that production was from. The contracts production was sold to, and the functional units that process fees may have been charged on, etc. These 100% share constants are part of what are contained within the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module and represent the whole contracts. They are pulled from the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module, or elsewhere, to populate the “template” that reside semi-permanently in the Accounting Voucher.

Now the Accounting Voucher, in the instance of the Material Balance Report, is a Joint Operating Committee voucher. Therefore the clearing of the accounts will be to each of the producers and they will each have access to the Accounting Voucher. The Partnership Accounting working interest share constants, which is similar in its makeup to the “template” in the Accounting Voucher, are a check and a balance for the Accounting Voucher calculations and each individual producers share to ensure that their interests are being calculated correctly in the Accounting Voucher. Since they are based on their understanding of the agreements as represented in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace module, there should be no variances. However this is oil and gas, if there was a variance then the producer would be notified before the voucher could be closed. [Note. Since we are developing these systems we will be using one data element to populate all three modules.]

The extent of this verification will be limited to the level of constants that the producer would have chosen to have populated the “template” in the Partnership Accounting module. The system won’t go out and look for the variables elsewhere. Therefore the level of system verification can be as high or as low as the producer feels comfortable with by populating the Partnership Accounting “template” with as many constants as they feel necessary. On the other hand the Accounting Voucher needs the full template of information in order to correctly process the information in the current months voucher. It is not an option or system verification as it is in the Partnership Accounting module.

I think that to have a variety of systems checks and balances on the calculations are a necessary part of the Partnership Accounting module. In the hands of the People, Ideas & Objects software development team, and user community I think this area of the module could become quite sophisticated, and as opposed to just tripping up the closing of the Accounting Voucher, be quite helpful in determining a number of accounting related difficulties to focus on. We discussed some of those possible accounting related areas in our previous posts on Partnership Accounting.

If a variance should arise in any area there would be a reason for it and upon further investigation probably lead to some adjustment. Any changes to an agreement that your firm was not made aware of would show up immediately. The data within the producer firms could not get out of line for more then the current month without large variances showing up somewhere. This system of checks and balances working in an automated fashion, if the data was updated appropriately, then the various instances of the data would be updated in the “template”, therefore leading to no variance. Once the “template” was setup, the user would only need to deal with any variances and work to resolve them. Ensuring that the producers accounting was being processed appropriately and the focus of the accounting resources was only on the issues that were of material concern.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. Email me here if you need an invite.

The Preliminary Specification Part LXI (FM Part VII)

I just want to take a moment to reiterate the Preliminary Specification series that I am publishing over these next few quarters is designed to initiate the process for the community. Earlier on it was thought that the community would be able to use the Draft Specification and the research that was contained within the blog. However, I think that by producing this series it is more organized and easier for the community to get a handle on the complexity of the processes and functionality of the modules. I think with this series, the Draft Specification and research the community will be able to get a solid start on the Preliminary Specification when it begins.

In today’s post I want to discuss one of the key differences that is occurring during the transition from the easy era of energy development to the current more difficult energy era. In the Preliminary Research Report I was critical of a what I called a banking mentality in the investment attitudes in oil and gas. Where, similar to a bank, one could invest your money in oil and gas and expect an annual 10% return on somewhat of a guaranteed basis. This banking mentality had arisen, I suggested, as a result of the poor energy prices in the 1980’s and other difficulties in the business in the early 1990’s.

Now some may think that I am contradicting myself from yesterday’s post by stating that this banking mentality is only the market dictating an expected return. I would suggest the two are different. Investing only to participate in the types of returns that a bank is able to compete with imputes that the industry has no risk profile. That everything is invested for the expected cash flow that will provide for the return on a proven basis. This is how the industry was run, with essentially no risks taken. Looking at the heads of successful oil and gas companies found financial people, lawyers and accountants as CEO’s. People who could relate to the commercial end of the business and deliver on the promised returns. Engineers and geologists toiled in obscurity.

Contrast this to the times of the 1960’s and some of the 1970’s when the industry was actively exploring for new fields. Investments were being made for the purposes of the long term prospects of the firm. The cash flows of the firm were worked on, however, the prospecting was the key to the future. I see today, in this difficult energy era, as being more similar in terms of investment attitude to the 1960’s and 1970’s time then the 1980’s and 1990’s. An era that is based on the earth science and engineering capabilities of the producer and what can be done in terms of discovery, and the production of reserves. A time when the engineering and geological minds were running the firm, and the accountants, finance and lawyers were in their designated support roles.

The bureaucracy that brought you the banking returns of the 1990’s are still running the show today. (Lawyers are a sticky bunch.) For them to become the team that will discover and produce the energy in this new earth science and engineering focused era can’t happen. There is no such metamorphosis. Until such time as the engineers and earth scientists move to control the firms and establish themselves in full control of the firms will this transition be complete. And we might only be at the beginning of this trend. Although I have seen a number of geologists as CFO’s, a trend that I think is very positive.

In terms of the Financial Marketplace module, as an investor, I want to know who has the best team and the best capability in terms of their earth science and engineering talents. In terms of how that potentially, as an investor, can make me money is significant. These geological and engineering teams potential to find large volumes of oil and gas reserves, and have those values realized overnight is of significant interest to me, as an investor. It is therefore necessary I think that the producers have some ability to promote their exploration and development team, prospects, capabilities and opportunities in the Financial Marketplace module, subject to regulatory compliance of course.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part LX (FM Part VI)

Our previous post reflects how the Preliminary Specifications Financial Marketplace creates the environment where speed and performance are rewarded with the ability to have the financial resources available when they are needed. A key focus of that marketplace will be on the return that is provided to the investors, and how the producer remains focused on providing the highest returns, and the delivery of those returns.

The first item of information that a marketplace should tell a producer is what is an acceptable rate of return for an investment in oil and gas. This is the criteria that all producers should use to evaluate their oil and gas investments. If the rate of return or capital allocation does not exceed the markets expected rate of return then the project should not proceed. There is no more important factor or information that a producer needs to know. The producers discipline and methodology in its capital allocation is how the successful producers succeed. This blogpost is how the Financial Marketplace module incorporates the calculations of return on investment and capital allocation in the Preliminary Specification.

First of all there are no more confidential, in my opinion, information then these calculations. Particularly the capital allocation can be a complex algorithm that is usually contained within multiple spreadsheets. Centralizing these calculations within the Financial Marketplace module would be opportune as its managed by the Security & Access Control module and general access to the historical accounting data. There is however much more to the decision making process then just the numbers. The managements discussion, based on the calculations is sometimes the important feature. Therefore having robust features for discussion throughout the calculations of return on investment and capital allocation will be necessary. This might best be represented as a black board feature of the module.

There is more to the process then just blue sky thinking and number crunching too. What I am suggesting here is that the process of capital allocation is an art as much as it is a science. The process needs to be rigorous and thorough enough to ensure that every rock has been overturn and inspected. That process can and should be automated to the highest level in the Preliminary Specifications Financial Marketplace module. It is up to the individual producer to either follow the process or to ignore it, as much as they do the capital allocation process today.

Astute readers will note the obvious contradiction that is inherent in the Financial Marketplace module. You have to love the contradictions. Doesn’t the speed we discussed yesterday contradict the deliberate pace of the capital allocation process described here? No, that is to say it shouldn’t, or they should be one in the same. Having the speed that was described yesterday was desirable only if you had some measure of control. The control is attained through the capital allocation process that is described here. These two forces, speed and control, are in the hands of the management of the firm and are reflected in the performance of the assets. The marketplace will see this performance and respond appropriately and that will be reflected through the Preliminary Specifications Financial Marketplace module.

Another contradiction might be suggested that with banks funding Joint Operating Committees on a semi-autonomous nature, this will interrupt the capital allocation process and affect the return calculations of the firm. We discussed this in a previous blog post on the Financial Marketplace module. That banks funding the Joint Operating Committee as opposed to taking general claims against the individual producers. Would be more motivated and aligned to develop the individual property. This might be contrary to the producer own capital allocation processes. That is true, however, since they are using borrowed money to invest in that Joint Operating Committee they are leveraging the investment of the producer. Therefore the actual return to the producer “should be” leveraged to the point that it would exceed the markets expected return.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part LIX (FM Part V)

Here at People, Ideas & Objects we frequently state that we are moving the compliance and governance frameworks of the hierarchy into alignment with the Joint Operating Committees legal, financial, operational decision making, cultural, communication, innovation and strategy frameworks. We are doing this to achieve greater speed, innovative capabilities and accountability. This post is to discuss how some of that speed is achieved, by reducing the financial constraints and the time required that financing has traditionally taken in oil and gas.

In our previous pass through the Financial Marketplace module. We discussed how banks could finance all the producers within a Joint Operating Committee. As opposed to today’s method of each producer having their own banker. This would provide a focus for the bank that is unconstrained by any other properties or concerns. We also discussed, with the technology automation that is available today, that both the producers and the banks could automate most of the increased logistical banking requirements that this would cause. I also suggested that the disenchanted oil and gas investor might be better served by providing them with the ability to invest directly in the property, giving them the opportunity to circumvent the bureaucracy. A bureaucracy that has provided no upside on 400% energy price increases. And lastly that these changes, made through the Financial Marketplace module, provide a focus for the alignment of the financial interests to the Joint Operating Committee to achieve some of that speed, innovative capability, and accountability.

Now lets explore that speed aspect. The Financial Marketplace module is one of three of People, Ideas & Objects marketplace modules. That imputes a line of communications is open between the financial marketplace and the producer firm that is above and beyond that of the compliance requirements. It is therefore going to have to be authored by the senior people of the firm who know what it is that they are authorized to state. The current investors who have an interest with the producer would be able to source historical accounting data and information on their investments from the producer from the Partnership Accounting module. Future plans and investments, the difficult situations to discuss, could be published and promoted in the Financial Marketplace and meet the regulations requirements for full disclosure. Thereby giving no investor or group any unfair advantage in terms of quality of information.

The point of the marketplace is the opportunity to establish significant and rich relationships with investors and bankers of all shapes and sizes. Make no mistake, the ability to attract capital will be on the basis of performance, for that there is no alternative. However, the speed and effort at which a producer is able to raise the funds necessary to develop their assets depends on the quality of those assets and the quality of the relationships they have with the investment community. The Financial Marketplace module helps to establish a stronger relationship with the investment community, therefore in a significant way increasing the speed at which you can approach the oil and gas business.

In a capital intensive industry, financing is a critical issue for any producer. In an industry where innovation is providing significant value add, and with escalating capital and costs of operations the relationships with your investors need to be of premier concern in your business. Speed will become a major criteria on how you will be evaluated in the marketplace. If you as a producer are unable to perform in terms of competing, or participating at the speed of the marketplace, you will be left behind, very quickly. Reputation has a permanence to it that is difficult to change. Financing can give you a head start and the ability to participate at the speed of the marketplace, and maybe even set the pace for those to try and follow. The speed at which a producer is able to execute would be reflected in the Financial Marketplace module. Transparent marketplaces are a two way street. And it is here that I think the Financial Marketplace module will enable those producers with superior performance to attain a real speed advantage.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification.

The Preliminary Specification Part LVIII (PLM Part VIII)

In today’s post I want to talk about the data and information that is contained within the Petroleum Lease Marketplace (PLM) module. Much of the collaborative information that is generated by the partnership representing the Joint Operating Committee is generated and stored in the PLM. This would include agreements, leases, AFE’s, etc. Access to this data would be based on the users need to know and would be based on the data’s nature of being either public, partnership or private in nature.

There will be a large percentage of the data within the PLM that is public in nature. This data will include the lease documents themselves and reflect who the lessee is and the mineral rights held. Although this information is public in nature, that is its available from the lessor’s websites, there is little reason to hold it public from a producer point of view. Access to a producers or Joint Operating Committees data and information through the People, Ideas & Objects application modules via a public interface doesn’t exist. Although the data and information may be accessible elsewhere, it is not available unless the individual has direct access granted through the Security & Access Control module.

Next there are areas where the data and information would be considered to be “partnership”. This of course being data and information that is directly related to the Joint Operating Committee. We have discussed the research project that the user community will undertake in the Preliminary Specification to determine if the data will reside with the JOC or with the producer. This is a good example of where the issue resides. If the agreements, leases and AFE’s are the same for all the producers why not store them within one location in the JOC and have access by the authorized producers. Then everyone is working from the same documents. Here’s where the Military Command & Control Metaphor will need to be sophisticated enough to enable the appropriate users from different producer firms to access these documents. Another consideration for the research project of the user community.

Then there will also be the private information that the producer generates that will be for strategic and tactical concerns, that will be for the producers eyes only. These discussions could be regarding one of the agreements that should not end up in the “partnership” area. How does a firm maintain access to this critical information and ensure that it doesn’t leak out to someone that it shouldn't?

The Draft Specification also asked an interesting question regarding the publication of aggregated data. It was in the context of the 3 - 5 year capital budgets of the producers. If producers were to maintain their expected capital budgets for the next 3 - 5 years in AFE format within the PLM, would they be interested in publishing that data in aggregate through the Resource Marketplace module. Now this data would be scrubbed of all pertinent proprietary information and only represent dollars, general geographical area and account classification. This information would provide the Resource Marketplace with information of approximately what the marketplace might look like in the 3 - 5 year time frame so that they could plan to meet the expected demand. Valuable information from a supplier industry point of view.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.


Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. 

The Preliminary Specification Part LVII (PLM Part VII)

In this post I want to discuss the manner in which People, Ideas & Objects software development team will support the division of labor and specialization in the Preliminary Specification and particularly in the Petroleum Lease Marketplace (PLM). We had discussed in the previous parts to the PLM that the determination of where the data would reside, and hence where the people would work in the industry. Would the data be stored within the Joint Operating Committee or the producer. This was to be determined by the community based on their research. We also noted that with the division of labor and further specialization of the people that work in the industry required that maybe individuals might not work for a specific producer or Joint Operating Committee but instead work for a process that was billed for example as a service to a 1,000 JOC’s representing 200 firms. This post assumes that both situations, the data is stored at the JOC, and a process is managed by a dedicated team that employs the people who work for a variety of JOC’s representing many producer firms, are the case.

When we consider the global experience and understanding of the people that are employed in the oil and gas industry. We have many people today with a diversity of experience and understanding of the industry. When we think of the future, in order to deal with the ability to handle the greater volumes of work, we generally feel that there is a need to have a wholesale increase in the overall experience and understanding of the industry. But is this necessarily the case. With the division of labor and specialization we are able to rely on a level of experience and understanding of a few that understand the entire process, and assign the specifics to those that can specialize in their own specific domain of understanding. With each person taking care of their part of the process, at a high level of understanding, the entire process is managed with an efficiency and understanding that aggregates the skills of all of those people within the process. This is the advantage of specialization. And it enables the industry to undertake greater processing loads with the same resource levels.

Now lets assume for a moment that you had a group that processed all the lease rentals for all the JOC’s and producers that used People, Ideas & Objects proposed software applications. And this groups was a very specialized team of 20 people who were supported by the software development team and user community that People, Ideas & Objects is based upon. How would you divide up that work to make it more efficient? Would it be based on producer or JOC? I don’t think so. Probably on the basis of rental due date, or maybe geographical location. One thing for certain the way that the work was organized would be fundamentally different then the way that lease rentals were organized within any firm or JOC today. No matter how large the producers size. The specialization that this service provider would be able to present would reduce the costs of lease rental processing and also increase the quality of the service, and the data and information that was presented. This is how I think we need to begin reorganizing some of the processes the industry depends upon. Here’s why.

How does the division of labor expand. That is to say, this lease rental process continues on and they find if they make a small change in the way they process this element of it, then they could save x% of time. This is the process of “gap filing” which makes inherent sense. Then the  boss says ok, sounds great go do it. The problem today is that all of our processes are highly automated. And the way that People, Ideas & Objects are talking in the Preliminary Specification these processes will be even more automated. Therefore the ability to change a process is heavily dependent on a software change. Which in the current environment is next to impossible. People, Ideas & Objects however are marketing a software development capability. One that is available for the purposes of gap filing and supporting the user community needs. One that is designed to support innovation. Therefore the ability to make the change in the process and have the software updated to support the process change is available. The larger issue of having this done once at the lease rental service provider makes the process manageable. As today, having to do this within each firm doesn’t provide the efficiencies that with tomorrows division of labor and specialization can provide, there isn't the volume of lease rental activity. It is also assumed in this example that the data is stored at the JOC and therefore the amount of lease rental data that is held at the JOC is relatively negligible, providing more support for centralizing the lease rental process under one service provider.

People, Ideas & Objects has introduced the concept of the Community of Independent Service Providers to initiate these types of process services. I think this is how the industry needs to reorganize themselves in order to attain the efficiencies and quality processes in the future. The example of lease rentals is only one of possibly hundreds of processes that could be handled in similar ways. The key competitive advantage of the innovative oil and gas producer is their land and asset base, & application of their earth science and engineering capabilities. The efficient development of internal administrative processes are not going to provide any producer with any competitive advantage or disadvantage. By developing processes in the manner that People, Ideas & Objects proposes provides all the producers with the most efficient and cost effective means of administrative management.

I’ll say it again. Unfortunately the current bureaucracy have chosen not to join us in this vision of the future. They are fully vested in the status quo and will have none of this discussion of organizing the industry in more efficient ways. It is for the C class and investor class to direct the flow of funds towards People, Ideas & Objects to begin the process of making this vision real.

For the industry to successfully provide for the consumers energy demands, it’s necessary to build the systems that identify and support the Joint Operating Committee. Building the Preliminary Specification is the focus of People, Ideas & Objects. Producers are encouraged to contact me in order to support our Revenue Model and begin their participation in these communities. Those individuals that are interested in joining People, Ideas & Objects can join me here and begin building the software necessary for the successful and innovative oil and gas industry.

Please note what Google+ provides us is the opportunity to prove that People, Ideas & Objects are committed to developing this community. That this is user developed software, not change that is driven from the top down. Join me on the People, Ideas & Objects Google+ Circle and begin building the community for the development of the Preliminary Specification. Email me here if you need an invite.