2040
The third quarter reports from the oil and gas producers however don’t provide me with the understanding of how we’ll get there. None of these companies are in good shape, in my opinion. Looking critically at the industry it is fair to assess the smaller producers as catastrophe’s. Many of the mid-sized and independent producers are in very poor shape as well. The only real known survivors, in my opinion, are those that can lean heavily on the refining and marketing side of the business to see the downstream support the upstream through these difficulties. Exxon, BP, Shell and Chevron relied heavily on their downstream operations to continue with profitable operations. Here’s the thing, however, these four companies have a $20 billion cash flow shortfall to make up. You have desperately weak companies that will need many years of rehabilitation and care in order to be nursed back into viable operations. Add the fact that interest rates are about to be increased, and you have at least ten years before you see, in my opinion, a resurgent oil and gas industry. Good commodity prices or not.
If we go back to my argument about the recording of capital assets. Whether under full cost or successful efforts. For decades it has been the tradition, the culture and the SEC dicated policy that everything is capitalized. This includes 75 - 80% of the overhead that is incurred by the producer on an annual basis. Overheads can reach 20 - 25% of the revenues in most companies. The smaller companies incur much larger percentages of overhead due to their inability to scale. All of these capital costs are amortized over the life of the oil and gas reserves. Making for an escalating size of the producers balance sheet. How will we tell the future investors that we still haven’t accounted for these costs when our hand is out for more money to recapitalize these firms?
The capital assets have been built up to stratospheric levels in each and every producer in the industry. At no time is the management, in the past twenty years ever been assessed based on the costs it took to build these capital assets. The amount of depletion within any year has usually been a token amount. It should be the opposite. The industry should have been willingly moving those assets off of the balance sheet and recognizing them as a cost in order to recover the cash investment made in the first place. If they did that in the past of course they would have recorded significant losses and probably would have gone out of business. The state of affairs today isn’t any different! The producer firms are zombie corporations that in a normal environment would have gone out of business. As they stand today they are just stacked to the ceiling with unaccounted for costs. By leaving the assets on the balance sheet they never have to account for their performance, and never realized the real costs of the oil and gas they produced. As a result they continued to overinvest with the annual infusion of “other people’s money” which lead to this period of overproduction. Now they have no cash, no working capital, literally no financial resources to lean on in the darkest days of the industry. Unhappy banks and angry investors. With stacks to the ceiling of capital assets that will sit there for a decade or longer before they are ever accounted for. A very desperate situation.
Organizationally oil and gas producers are running out of pink colored paper. They forced the service industry into the mode of having to cannibalize their businesses in order to survive. Layoffs in that industry have been epic. And probably only the initial phases are over. The people that work in oil and gas are being sent home at a rapid pace as well. In Calgary you can buy a $4 million home for $1.2 million. The attitude in the employment marketplace is that there are better opportunities elsewhere in other industries. Why wait for oil and gas to get itself sorted. I find the bureaucrats are employing a 1960’s type of attitude that deals with its overproduction issues by laying off the staff and service industry. Anything but actually deal with the problem or take responsibility for it. I think my opinion is well known on this point.
We stand on the shoulders of giants. What I am saying is we have far to fall in terms of our capabilities as an industry. Investors have spent the past decades subsidizing oil and gas consumers because bureaucrats refuse to account for their performance. We have 25 years of hard work ahead of us. We are the most important industry to society. I don’t honestly know how, based on the current situation these bureaucrats have put us in, we are going to overcome the difficulties that they have created for these organizations. To focus the industry on its future is not a conversation that I can have with anyone. I do know that the only way we can see clearly through this fog of destruction is with the Preliminary Specification. I am certainly biased, but then again, I’ve been screaming about these problems for a while.
The Preliminary Specification and user community provides the oil and gas producer with the most dynamic, innovative, profitable and successful means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don’t forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.