The #User #Community #Vision Part V
But there is more. Non participation will also make it that the producers particular requirements, your unique way of administration, accounting and operations are not accommodated or considered. That none of the software is built for the situations that your company has experienced. And that premier asset of yours doesn't have the software to handle the particular nuances of how it makes money. The bureaucrats will say they have it covered with their current administration, and they do, to the extent that it makes money today.
There is also the fact that your people are not participating in the user community itself. I expect the user community to be dynamic and fast paced with significant iterations being made over the business model that uses the Joint Operating Committee. Your people won't know what these changes are and they won't know what the implications are to the assets that you hold. As an analogy you're the four year old that has closed his eyes and covered their ears and shouted they're not listening. Yours will be a very effective strategy.
Your shareholders will be wise to your actions and wonder why you are not participating. Is their profitability not an issue with you? Or are you unaware of the technical progress that has occurred in the past 20 years. They will have questions and will need answers.
One answer might be that it is best to sit out and see how things develop. I think in this case sitting on the side lines will be the tragic choice. You should choose to be in or out and have your reasons, but to sit on the fence will be the worst choice of all. When the user community iterates on the model in the first phase of development the software will be quite advanced. More advanced than your organization can handle or understand. The user community and the developers will not stop iterating on the model. What you will find is that the ability to catch up doesn’t exist. The software will be bringing in new concepts and features on top of the previous features that you didn’t participate in, and therefore can’t understand or implement. Leaving you unable to make the transition.
This sounds very similar to President George Bush’s claim that you're either with us, or against us. You have to chose. There is no middle road. And I am sure that the bureaucracy could all decide that they are against participation in the user community. Their reasoning would be financial they don't want to pay the fees to get to the point to where they can participate. But there will be a day when the decision is taken away from them and the investors can assert their needs for profits. And demand that the Preliminary Specification and associated business models be implemented in the industry. Until then we will keep building the user community that will eventually build the alternative means of organization to what the bureaucrats feel is acceptable. Then we won't need either. The producers in their unprofitable form, or the bureaucrats. Just the investors and the user community is all that will be required to establish a profitable oil and gas industry.
The Preliminary Specification provides the oil and gas producer with the most profitable means of oil and gas operations. People, Ideas & Objects Revenue Model specifies the means in which investors can participate in these user defined software developments. Users are welcome to join me here. Together we can begin to meet the future demands for energy. And don't forget to join our network on Twitter @piobiz anyone can contact me at 403-200-2302 or email here.